Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


May 03, 2006

Microsoft Is Not Delaying Vista Again as Beta 2 Looms

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More News and Analysis Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

A Gartner research note this week warns that Microsoft "may" delay Windows Vista another two months. But in addition to an official denial from Microsoft, my sources say that the Gartner warning is off base.

Here's what really happened. Earlier this year, Microsoft granted Gartner unprecedented access to its internal processes, apparently in an effort to prove that the software giant was, in fact, on track to ship Vista by the end of 2006 as promised. Gartner, however, concluded differently and said that Microsoft would likely delay Vista because it's too complex to meet the scheduled late-2006 completion date. Gartner says it believes Microsoft won't be able to ship Vista until sometime between April and June 2007. Although the software giant quickly disagreed with this conclusion, it has been widely reported as fact.

Aside from my internal Microsoft sources, my own experience covering Microsoft suggests that Gartner is incorrect. According to Gartner, the reason for the delay is that Microsoft will soon ship Vista Beta 2 and the company will need 9 to 12 months after Beta 2 to complete the product. Windows XP, Gartner notes, took 5 months between Beta 2 and its final release, but Vista is more complex than XP. Gartner says that from a complexity standpoint, Vista is more comparable to Windows 2000, which required 16 months to progress from Beta 2 to the final version.

But that comparison is ludicrous. When Microsoft shipped Win2K Beta 2 in 1998, Win2K was still called Windows NT 5.0 and the product was horribly off track. Within months, the company assigned Brian Valentine to take over Win2K development, and he helped guide the project to its completion a year later. Vista today is much further along than was NT 5.0/Win2K Beta 2. And it's much closer to the shipping version of the product than the Gartner report suggests.

Granted, predicting another Vista delay is a fairly safe bet. Microsoft has already delayed Vista several times, and delaying it again from January 2007 to April or June 2007 won't make a big difference from a sales perspective. And after all, Microsoft has said Vista was on track before and then delayed the product. But nothing at present suggests that Microsoft is ready to delay Vista yet again. While Gartner could very well have seen something at Microsoft that caused it to believe the company is ready to delay the product once more, the aforementioned comparison with Win2K is bogus.

In related news, Microsoft continues work on Vista build 5381, which will be finalized as Beta 2 on May 22. Attendees of the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) 2006 will receive Vista Beta 2 on DVD, and Microsoft plans to seed the build with testers, other partners, and millions of consumers via a widely distributed Community Preview Program (CPP) in the following days. If you've been waiting for a chance to get your hands on Vista, that day is finally coming.

End of Article



Reader Comments
"Microsoft has already delayed Vista several times"
-Paul Thurrott

"Vista has never been delayed. I mean, we had earlier conceptualizations, but the thing that is Vista is on its track."
- Steve Ballmer
http://tinyurl.com/qhwbc

lotsamystuff May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Gartner is rather betting on a MS tradition of delays than actually doing any sort of logical thinking. They just want to look good by betting on something as certain as that the year will end on december 31st.

But in the end Vista will sell like there is no end to it; generating billions for MS just as planned along withe office suite. Gartner should predict that as well.

guruguru May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


The company needs something huge very soon. Their stock seems to be in a free-fall. The Vista delay rumors are not helping either. Forbes says MS may be considering buying a stake in yahoo!

shark47 May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


I wouldn't be surprised to see another Vista delay, although whatever state Vista is in on May 22 will be deemed Beta 2 for WinHEC distribution. Who known when the CPP will be put the OS in consumers' hands.

Guruguru is right. Vista will make alot of cash for Microsoft. But XP is generating revenue right now, too. And so is Office.

As for shark47's comment, I hope Microsoft stays away from Yahoo! And I think the stock "free-fall" is indicative of the leadership quality of Gates and Ballmer.

mwrisner May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"I think the stock "free-fall" is indicative of the leadership quality of Gates and Ballmer."

Doesn't make sense. Without Gates (and Ballmer to some extent), there would have been no Microsoft. And there's no denying that Microsoft is still a hugely successful company.

shark47 May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Vista deserves to be successful. It may not be revolutionary (the way Windows 95 was), but it's definitely not "Window XP SR-3 EyeCandy Edition." After all those posts by NateB2, explaining the changes in Vista, I wonder why anyone would make such a stupid comment. Vista is a major upgrade to XP and for the consumer's sake, I hope it comes out on time. And I'm willing to go with Paul on this one. He will, in myopinion, know better than Gartner, when the final version will ship.

yahoo May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


90% of PC users haven't even heard about Vista. They could delay another year and Windows XP will still have strong sales. It's only the tech saavy who are throwing their arms up.

anonymous May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"It's only the tech saavy who are throwing their arms up."

Well, them and Wall Street.

Better to get it right than rush it out the door. But if after all this time this thing isn't bulletproof, the reaction's going to be even worse. Here's hoping for the best...

lotsamystuff May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"it may not be revolutionary (the way Windows 95 was), but it's definitely not "Window XP SR-3 EyeCandy Edition." After all those posts by NateB2, explaining the changes in Vista, I wonder why anyone would make such a stupid comment. Vista is a major upgrade to XP and for the consumer's sake, I hope it comes out on time."

I tend to agree with you. But some very intelligent pundits are saying otherwise. To wit:

1) Well-known Tech Journalist Paul Thurrott wrote: "Promises were made. Excitement was generated. None of it, as it turns out, was worth a damn. From a technical standpoint, the version of Windows Vista we will receive is a sad shell of its former self, a shadow. ... Shame on you, Microsoft. Shame on you, but not just for not doing better ... Windows Vista is a disappointment. There is no way to sugarcoat that very real truth.

2) John Dvorak (who Microsofties seem to love whenever he rails against a certain "other" tech company): "Vista OS. It's now so delayed that its consumer version will miss the 2006 Christmas season. It's now supposed to arrive in early 2007. Even when it does, all of its promised cool features have been removed and it appears to be little more than a gussied-up version of Windows XP. It appears as if it is going to be a great disappointment. This should have been the company's number one priority."

I'm not saying he's right, but love him or hate him, Dvorak is no dummy. And Paul's opinions are respected for a reason--he's earned the right to be opinionated (even when he's wrong). Perhaps you should ask these folks why they made such a "stupid comment". I'm sure the answers would be enlightening.

lotsamystuff May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"Perhaps you should ask these folks why they made such a "stupid comment". I'm sure the answers would be enlightening."

I think when you tell somebody they are going to have all of these cool features and then take out half of them, anybody would be dissappointed.
From a consumer stand point, it may seem like more eye candy than anything. There is alot more going on underneath and you will see better 3rd party applications because of it. In the end, does the consumer really matter? It will be pre-installed on every new machine and will have better security than previous Windows versions.
As long as they can accomplish what they were doing before it doesn't matter.

anonymous May 03, 2006 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4 

You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

PsExec

This freeware utility lets you execute processes on a remote system and redirect output to the local system. ...

How can I stop and start services from the command line?

...


Related Events Configuration Manager SP1 and R2 Overview

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing