Windows IT Pro is the authoritative and independent resource for windows nt, windows 2000, windows 2003, windows xp. Features a collection of resources and magazines for windows IT professionals.
  
  
  Advanced Search 


May 01, 2006

Google Lashes Out at IE 7 Search Feature

RSS
Subscribe to Windows IT Pro | See More Internet Articles Here | Reprints | Or get the Monthly Online Pass—only $5.95 a month!

A month ago, Google approached the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the European Union (EU) to complain about the Internet search feature in Microsoft's upcoming Internet Explorer (IE) 7 Web browser, which Google says unfairly promotes Microsoft's MSN Search service. The tactic, which might be described as tattling if both companies were three-year-old children, is debatable: Google is betting that antitrust regulators at the DOJ and EU will see parallels between IE 7's use of MSN and Microsoft's ignominious defeat of Netscape a decade ago. But Google is a much more powerful and cash-rich company than Netscape ever was. Where does one draw the line between competition and product bundling?

"The market favors open choice for search, and companies should compete for users based on the quality of their search services," says Google Vice President Marissa Mayer. "We don't think it's right for Microsoft to just set the default to MSN. We believe users should choose."

To date, neither the DOJ nor the EU has elected to pursue the case. And Microsoft argues, correctly, that the IE 7 search box--a tiny slice of onscreen real estate in the upper right corner of the browser window--is remarkably easy for consumers to configure for their favorite search engine. If people really do prefer Google, the argument goes, they'll have no problem changing IE 7 to use Google instead of MSN Search.

In my own tests of the Beta 2 version of the browser, I found this feature to be quite open to competitive search engines. Here's how I described this feature in my review of IE 7 Beta 2: "Microsoft even lets you easily change the default search engine to your favorite, including Google," I wrote. "And there's none of the stupidity you might suspect Microsoft of engaging in here at all. The company is even maintaining a Web site full of search engine providers so you can pick your favorite search engine easily and get on with life."

Microsoft's response to Google is priceless. The software giant says that IE 7 is designed to be pro-user, whether Google likes it or not. "Whatever behavior happened in the past, the guiding principle we had is that the user is in control," says Dean Hachamovitch, the general manager of the Internet Explorer team at Microsoft. And if you're still terrified that IE 7 will harm Google, consider these facts: Google is set as the default search engine in most rival browsers, including Mozilla Firefox. And Google recently promoted Firefox on its heavily trafficked--and market-leading--Web site. The Firefox version Google points to, naturally, includes an integrated Google toolbar.

As a powerful monopolist, Microsoft should be watched carefully. But many of its competitors have chosen of late to compete in the courts rather than in the open market, perhaps because they feel that the software giant's legal woes make it more vulnerable. Google's allegation is frivolous. It's the dominant market leader in Internet search today and likely will be for some time to come. Google and Microsoft should be allowed to duke it out in traditional competitive ways for market share, eyeballs, and ad dollars.

End of Article



Reader Comments
Right. Google has never complained to Mozilla that Firefox defaults to Google (and neither has Microsoft, for that matter). Obviously, Google's statement of "We don't think it's right for Microsoft to just set the default to MSN. We believe users should choose" is a load of you-know-what. These companies that view themselves as underdogs feel it's ok for them to gang up and promote each other, but not ok for Microsoft to promote itself.

jnisbet May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


When I tested IE7 Beta 2, I set up Google's home page to be on one of the opening tabs. Google's page evidently tested for IE7 and had a graphic that pointed DIRECTLY at the search box and offered to change the search's default to Google.

Sounds like Google had the perfect competitive solution to its fabricated problem.

All tech companies (Microsoft, Google, Real, etc.) should quit whining!

mwrisner May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


In the nytimes article, a google spokesperson says it's going to be difficult to change the default search engine to google. Surely, they can come up with a better argument than that. Changing the default search engine is just as easy or as hard as it is in FF.

shark47 May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Google is spaming my searchpage with firefox adds. it is turning into another yahoo. One of the reasons I used it was because it used to be clean and search oriented. Now it looks like a punk open source apologetics company trying to ram everything down people's throat. Not to say MS is different but google should be. or at least they claimed to be. but the truth is, they aren't. down with google.

guruguru May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


I can understand Google complaining because IE has such a huge market share. However, if IE changes to allow the user to initially select the search engine, then so should firefox. Fair is fair, right?

anonymous May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


FYI, everytime I post a comment I get a message box in IE that says it aborted and then I get page cannot be displayed. I wonder what funky code is screwing up IE6.

anonymous May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"Surely, they can come up with a better argument than that."

Better, perhaps, but no less true.

Paul writes: "The Firefox version Google points to, naturally, includes an integrated Google toolbar."

Oh, Paul, you're being disingenuous again. If you were really an objective reporter rather than a Microsoft shill, you'd have written, "The Firefox version Google points to includes a customizable integrated toolbar with Google as the default option." Now THAT would have been some refreshing honesty on your part!

"These companies that view themselves as underdogs feel it's ok for them to gang up and promote each other, but not ok for Microsoft to promote itself."

Two words: Convicted Monopolist

What y'all keep forgetting is that as a company convicted of using its monopoly status to stifle competition, Microsoft must be very careful here, and, as Paul correctly points out, "Microsoft should be watched carefully". Within a few months of its introduction, IE7 will probably be one of the dominant--if not THE dominant--browsers on the planet. If (and note, sharky and others, I said IF) Microsoft starts making it difficult or impossible for others to compete, they should be stomped on. HARD.

But hey, this thing's still in Beta, right? Plenty of time for MS to play nice with others. Like they always do!

lotsamystuff May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


Lotsamystuff, have you used IE 7 Beta 2? Have you visited the IE team's blog (blogs.msdn.com/ie)? Have you read Paul's reviews on IE 7? If so, you should have noted that IE's integrated search bar makes it very EASY to change search providers; when I visit Google's homepage, Windows Live homepage, the arrow beside the "Search" button lights up, and if I click it, it displays a drop-down menu with an option to "Add this Search provider" and "Make this provider the default." IT DOES "play nice with others"!

NateB2 May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"But hey, this thing's still in Beta, right? Plenty of time for MS to play nice with others. Like they always do!"

Yup. They should play nice with Google. After all, Google is the epitome of all that's nice in this world. MS should make google search the default search engine in IE7. They should make google.com (or) getfirefox.com the default homepage. And, of course, MS should pay google royalties for using their search engine in IE. Now that would be fair. After all, and you never tire of this, MS is a "convicted monopolist".

shark47 May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


"If Microsoft starts making it difficult or impossible for others to compete, they should be stomped on. HARD."

That rule applies to any company, whether a "convicted monopolist" or not. If Google does the same thing, they should be punished too and they will.

shark47 May 01, 2006 (Article Rating: )


 See More Comments  1   2   3   4 

You must log on before posting a comment.

If you don't have a username & password, please register now.




Top Viewed ArticlesView all articles
Command Prompt Tricks

One reader shares his tip for setting up the command prompt to reflect a remote path. ...

PsExec

This freeware utility lets you execute processes on a remote system and redirect output to the local system. ...

How can I stop and start services from the command line?

...


Related Events Virtualization, Automation and Databases

Delivering Reliable and Effective Web-Based Applications

Making Web Application Perform Better: What to Watch, How to Watch It, and How to Fix It

Check out our list of Free Email Newsletters!

News and Analysis eBooks Business Process Automation - Managing Cost in Your Enterprise

Related News and Analysis Resources Become a VIP member of the Windows IT Pro community!
Get it all with the VIP CD and VIP access. A $500+ value for only $279!

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!
Solve your toughest technical problems with our experts and access 10,000 + articles online. 30% off

Monthly Online Pass - Only $5.95!
Get instant access to 10,000+ articles from Windows IT Pro Magazine!

TechNet Virtual Labs
Evaluate and test Microsoft's newest products.


Windows IT Pro Home Register FAQ for Windows WinInfo News
Europe Edition About Us Contact Us/Customer Service Media Kit Affiliates / Licensing  
SQL Server Magazine Office & SharePoint Pro Windows Dev Pro IT Job Hound ITTV
IT Library Technology Resource Directory Connected Home Windows Excavator Windows SuperSite 
 
 Windows IT Pro is a Division of Penton Media Inc.
 Copyright © 2008 Penton Media, Inc., All rights reserved. Terms and Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints and Licensing