Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
August 29, 2006 12:00 AM

Virtualizing Exchange 2003

Do Exchange 2003 mailbox VMs make sense?
Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #92983
Rating: (2)

Running Exchange on VMware
VMware has pushed the idea of virtual Exchange servers for several years. VMware even wrote a white paper on this topic, Running Microsoft Ex- change Server in a Virtual Machine Using ESX Server 2.5 (http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/resources/510). VMware offers tools such as VMotion to move servers within a virtual environment and VMware VirtualCenter to manage the VMware ESX Server platform and deploy new virtual servers configured from prebuilt templates. Although the white paper outlines the advantages of the virtual server approach, VMware acknowledges that Microsoft doesn’t support Exchange 2003 running on a VMware platform and that moving overloaded Exchange 2003 servers into a virtual environment is unlikely to return great benefits.

VMware claims that it can work around Microsoft’s support policy by deploying active mailbox and other Exchange 2003 servers on a physical system, while keeping passive virtual servers available as a fallback if a problem occurs with a physical server. VMware’s workaround is certainly an interesting approach: Microsoft will support Exchange 2003 running on the physical servers, and customers will realize some cost efficiency and resilience by deploying passive back- up servers. However, because you need to use clusters to create active and passive Exchange nodes, deploying Exchange 2003 according to VMware’s recommendations increases cost and adds support problems to the existing complexity of cluster deployment and operation, outweighing most of the benefits achieved by using passive backup servers.

Should You Wait?
Configuring complex storage remains a challenge for virtualized environments today. So unless you plan to support only a small number of concurrent users, I recommend that you stay away from virtual Exchange 2003 mailbox servers. Exchange 2003 servers that generate smaller I/O loads, such as bridgehead or mail hygiene servers, are better candidates for virtualization. In part two of this article, I’ll discuss deploying Exchange 2003 in a virtualized environment.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Bill
    5 years ago
    Aug 16, 2007

    Can't conmment until I can ready it.....

  • herman.dupreez
    6 years ago
    Dec 05, 2006

    Good

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.