Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
October 07, 2009 12:00 AM

Microsoft Launches Windows Mobile 6.5

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #102921
Rating: (6)

Microsoft launched the latest version of its Windows Mobile OS on Tuesday, ushering in a new era of Windows phones. But reviewer reaction to the new smart phone platform has been more negative than expected, triggering worries that the company has another Windows Vista on its hands.

The problem is that Windows Mobile 6.5 doesn't go far enough to address the rapidly evolving competitive landscape, which is coalescing around multi-touch, Internet-savvy devices (e.g., the Apple iPhone) that are backed by vibrant mobile marketplaces. Windows Mobile 6.5 seems to hit all the high points—it supports touch controls, has an improved web browser, can connect to an online store, and is more consumer-friendly—but the new UIs appear to be tacked on to the aging Windows Mobile infrastructure, which reveals itself far too frequently.

Some Microsoft device partners (particularly HTC) overcome these problems by replacing huge chunks of Windows Mobile with their own UIs, often with mixed results. But although any attempt to improve Windows Mobile is appreciated, it's confusing that HTC and others appear to be innovating more on Microsoft's platform than Microsoft is.

At a special event in New York on Tuesday, Microsoft said that 30 or more Windows Mobile 6.5-based smart phone models would ship to users in more than 20 countries by the end of the year, and several are available in most major markets already. The devices include iPhone-like touchscreen phones as well as more traditional smart phones with fixed or slide-out hardware keyboards.

Microsoft says this diversity is key to the Windows phone ecosystem: Whereas Apple targets consumers almost exclusively with the iPhone, and Research in Motion's (RIM's) BlackBerry is used almost solely by business users, Microsoft hopes to straddle both segments with Windows Mobile.

That would be a good approach if it worked. But Windows Mobile seems about as consumer-friendly as RIM once you get past the thin veneer of UI that Microsoft added to Windows Mobile 6.5. And the company still has a lot of work to do to convince corporate customers that Windows Mobile is a more viable solution for on-the-go knowledge workers.

Meanwhile, the few remaining Windows phone enthusiasts are still looking to the future for salvation, this time in the form of Windows Mobile 7. Widely expected in 2010 for some reason, Windows Mobile 7 won't really ship until some indefinite time in the future, and Microsoft has provided absolutely no concrete details. In other words, at this point in time, Windows Mobile 7 is whatever you want it to be. And that's a lot, given the disappointing present.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Andrew
    3 years ago
    Oct 10, 2009

    enjoy:

    http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/181255.asp

  • sx4sport@hotmail.com
    3 years ago
    Oct 09, 2009

    ha ha - excellent points but lost on this WindowsITconsumer forum...

  • 3 years ago
    Oct 08, 2009

    "That's the stupidest comment I've ever read. Paul knows more about WinMobile than you've forgotten, I reckon. You simply cannot be serious.

    But let's assume you are. By your logic, you are forbidden from commenting on the iPhone (since you don't use one). And in life, you are forbidden from making observations about anything you don't have personal involvement in, so if you're not an accountant, you can't have opinions about government budgets."

    First of all, I follow Paul T's postings on Windows as well as his podcasts and I do know -and he has discussed extensively - his love affair with the iphone. He has not used any recent WinMo phone as his personal phone.

    Second, I am aware of the iphone. We have one (my wife owns it). Apple has certainly done a good job for consumers on this phone. WinMo phones need more work from the users. Thus, they are not "consumer friendly" devices. I cannot agree more on this. On the other hand, this is not what one needs to concentrate on in reviewing an OS.

    Much of the reason that WinMo phones are not "consumer friendly" is the responsibility of the carriers. They concentrate in selling these devices to corporations which do their own customizations. WinMo phones were never thought of as "consumer" items.

    In addition, Microsoft does not have the manufacturer and carrier control to force a "consumer friendly" customization of WinMo phones. It needs to bite the bullet and produce its own device to get there. As things stand, WinMo can only provide the underpinnings of what can be dozens of devices with different UIs and different levels of "consumer friendliness". So, one should review the OS on this basis and this basis alone. Or one should review individual phones. And one should not concentrate on what one's own usability "yardstick" is. Some may like touch but I do prefer a combination of touch and stylus so I can get more info into the screen and have two ways of input. Touch is not the "end all".

  • Lotsa
    3 years ago
    Oct 08, 2009

    "This is a useless article written by a person that does not have any serious exposure to Windows Mobile. Paul T is a iPhone user and this allow should disqualify him from posting any editorials on Windows Mobile. "

    That's the stupidest comment I've ever read. Paul knows more about WinMobile than you've forgotten, I reckon. You simply cannot be serious.

    But let's assume you are. By your logic, you are forbidden from commenting on the iPhone (since you don't use one). And in life, you are forbidden from making observations about anything you don't have personal involvement in, so if you're not an accountant, you can't have opinions about government budgets. If you're not a woman, you can't have an opinion about abortion, birth control, or hemline heights. Unless you're a CEO, you can't comment on how companies are run. However, you can comment on the interior of your colon, since that seems to be where your head is.

  • Gerry
    3 years ago
    Oct 08, 2009

    I have to agree with these posters. WinMo 6.5 is a really good improvement of 6.1 and has added some nice touch interface touches. Ok so it needs a little work on the consumer end, but a combination of unbeatable exchange support, add Mesh doc sychronisation and there are some pretty clear advantages to the platform.

    Just my views, but I'm pretty happy to have a nice new Acer F1 WM6.5 phone over anything else

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.