Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
August 29, 2007 12:00 AM

Symantec CEO Brings Up the Dreaded 'M' Word in Microsoft Critique

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #96928
Rating: (21)

Symantec Chairman and CEO John Thompson is no doubt a capable guy. But it seems like he's spent more time in the past year complaining about Microsoft and its latest OS release, Windows Vista, than promoting his own products. Mr. Thompson has been a constant and high profile thorn in Microsoft's side during this time period. But this week, he raised the dreaded "m" word--monopoly--bringing his charges to a whole new level.

Appearing at the Nasdaq stock exchange in New York this week, Thompson discussed Microsoft's recent foray into the client security market with its Windows Live OneCare subscription suite. Thanks to its low price and wide set of features, many of which deal with PC maintenance rather than security, OneCare has changed the way that consumers and security providers think about such software.

"I don't want to say [OneCare] was monopolistic, but it looked that way to some of us," Thompson said. The charge, of course, is that Microsoft now sells both the software that is vulnerable--Windows--and the software that protects against those vulnerabilities. Previous to the release of OneCare, Symantec faced only a few major competitors as well as a host of smaller, less capable companies.

Thompson also offered a small complement for Microsoft and OneCare, noting that the software giant's new security service has "clearly recast prior expectations for consumer security technology." Indeed, Symantec has responded to the OneCare threat with its own product, Norton 360, which is surprisingly similar to OneCare, as it provides both PC security and maintenance functionality. Norton 360, however, is quite a bit more expensive than OneCare, and Thompson's monopoly charge against Microsoft no doubt includes what he sees as OneCare's predatory pricing.

Thompson was in New York to celebrate the release of Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2008 and Norton Antivirus 2008 products. In addition to his anti-Microsoft volley and these new products, Thompson revealed that Symantec doesn't plan any major acquisitions of the scale of the company's 2005 purchase of Veritas for $10 billion. That said, Thompson said he has no problem changing the company or its products in major ways to meet the needs of a changing market.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Lotsa
    5 years ago
    Aug 31, 2007

    "Typo's are not in the job description :)"

    And an apostrophe does not mean, "Look out! Here comes an 'S'!"

    ;-)

    (I tried to stop. I really did.)

  • Run
    5 years ago
    Aug 30, 2007

    "Come on, we don't need another lotsasnarkystuff here. I'm sure it was only a typo."

    Uh-huh. And he's a journalist. Typo's are not in the job description :)

  • Reflections
    5 years ago
    Aug 30, 2007

    @Wae

    I don't know why you keep beating the dead horse regarding the classmate/OLPC options. Intel has been on the OLPC board for a while now and even offered open source developers to the project.

    http://www.intel.com/intel/worldahead/olpc.htm

  • subzerohitman721
    5 years ago
    Aug 30, 2007

    Do some of these CEO/Chairman types ever really listen to themselves? While I like Symantec for their security response during antivirus/antimalware situations; I really don't care about his complaints about One Care Live.

    I quit using Norton Anti-Virus in 2003 when I found out about AVG. Since I made the switch, I've never looked back. I agree with many of the opinions on here. A lot of the antivirus solutions feel like unnecessary bloatware. Norton, McAfee, PC-Cillin, Kaspersky, ZoneAlarm, CA etrust, and many "Security Solutions" turn out to be resource/time wasting garbage. Any problems I've had with AVG were easily fixed. AVG takes so little disk space or processing power that I can easily multi-task with it running.

    I also have to compliment Microsoft for chosing the right company and program that became Windows Defender. Defender works great and allows me to work without being hindered by bloatware.

    If Symantec and other "Security" companies are so concerned about the competition, I recommend they re-write all the anti virus, antispyware, and internet security solutions so they actually WORK! How much hard drive space does Norton Antivirus consume as of late? How many viruses and malware got through their defenses? Why should anyone cough up $39.99 USD for Norton Antivirus, which really doesn't work well?

    AVG is free for those who just want a basic antivirus solution. For those who want more, the full version costs the same as Norton, works better as an anti-virus solution, allows for multi-tasking, and uses less disk space.

    Symantec is a victim of its own success. I remember back in the late 80's to early 90's when Norton was king of all anti-virus. Right now, I give that to Grisoft and AVG, by giving the consumers what we want without all the crap.

    I don't like One Care that much, but would use it before I grab a Norton Disk. Infact, we use Norton disk in our house as mug coasters for our PC desks.

  • Shravan
    5 years ago
    Aug 29, 2007

    "Good God Paul. It's COMPLIMENT, not complement. They're two completely different words."

    Come on, we don't need another lotsasnarkystuff here. I'm sure it was only a typo.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.