Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
May 28, 2001 12:00 AM

Windows 2000 VPN Basics

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #21243
Rating: (1)

Last week, I explained how to ensure that your RAS users can reliably authenticate in a mixed Windows 2000 and Windows NT 4.0 environment. One solution that lets you avoid relaxing Active Directory's (AD’s) default security settings is to upgrade all your NT 4.0 RAS servers to Win2K. Win2K includes several enhancements to NT 4.0's RAS service—enhancements that might prompt you to migrate your RAS servers sooner rather than later. One such enhancement is Win2K’s VPN support.

VPN connections are similar to dial-up connections in that they give remote users access to your network. But unlike dial-up connections, VPNs let you use an existing network—the Internet, for example—as the connection medium. VPNs wrap the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) packets used in dial-up connections with additional tunneling protocol headers that let the VPN packets travel securely over a shared network. VPN is especially beneficial in situations where users would otherwise incur long-distance charges when dialing in to your network. To use VPN, all you need at the client is a connection to the Internet (and with the proliferation of broadband Internet connections, VPN users can realize significantly greater connection speeds than dial-up users). Of course, because you're communicating over a public network, it's important that you adequately secure data communications. How you secure data communications depends on the tunneling protocol you use.

Win2K supports two tunneling protocols: PPTP and Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). Win2K and NT 4.0 both support PPTP, so you can use the protocol with both Win2K Professional and NT Workstation clients. Another advantage of PPTP is that PPTP transmissions pass through a Network Address Translation (NAT) server. However, one downside to PPTP is that because it relies on Microsoft Point-to-Point Encryption (MPPE), it doesn’t provide strong security. MPPE can use a 128-bit encryption key, but you must use the default 40-bit encryption key to provide compatibility with NT 4.0 clients.

L2TP, which is new with Win2K, overcomes PPTP's security limitations by enlisting IP Security (IPSec) to encrypt data for transmission. L2TP wraps a PPP packet with an L2TP header and UDP header, making it safe to transmit the packet over the Internet. IPSec encapsulation then encrypts the packet and provides an unencrypted IP header that provides the necessary addressing information between the VPN client and VPN server. L2TP and IPSec provide better security than PPTP, but the technology requires client support that's available only from Win2K, and L2TP-IPSec traffic can't pass through an NAT server.

You might think that a choice between tunneling protocols would create administrative overhead, but Win2K RAS server can support both tunneling protocols simultaneously. Next week, I'll describe how to configure Win2K RAS servers and Win2K clients for VPN.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Mar 11, 2005

    Windows L2TP/IPSec NAT-T update provides better support for VPN clients that are behind NAT devices.

  • SUDHIR SHETTY
    9 years ago
    Nov 05, 2003

    i found your this little page --beautiful and fantastic and vey crystal clear
    since i am working in broadband tech. company our client have VPN req. we provide NAT based broadband router is it possible VPN to work behind Nat router ...VPN 2k clients r on private IPs......out NAT router is UBR924....plS SUGGEST US THE WAY......

  • Sean McAllister
    9 years ago
    Oct 28, 2003

    Very Informative, and expertly explained! thanks...

  • Dan Sowder
    10 years ago
    Jun 21, 2002

    Very well written article. Thanks for the information it was very usefel.

    DKS

  • Brenda Bell
    11 years ago
    May 29, 2001

    Hmmmm. McIntosh says "Another advantage of PPTP is that PPTP transmissions pass through a Network Address Translation (NAT) server." I found this statement to be confusing and/or misleading. Isn't the originating IP and port encrypted in VPN traffic such that manipulation of the source port by a NAT server would result in the VPN server assuming that the message has been tampered with?

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.