http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5777518/rsscomment/5777518en-USSun, 27 May 2012 07:29:55 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 07:29:55 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorTue, 18 Mar 2008 01:27:37 GMT
Good]]>vTue, 18 Mar 2008 01:27:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Feb 2007 19:03:22 GMT
I’m fine with Sun walking away, but since Sun isn’t recognized as a "standards body" then can we quit calling things related to Java "standards"? It’s a proprietary language spec for all practical purposes (a la Visual Basic) rather than an open spec (a la C#).]]>CharlesThu, 22 Feb 2007 19:03:22 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorTue, 13 Sep 2005 00:20:04 GMT
please specify the fees details of each paper.]]>jayant lalan Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:20:04 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/installation2/microsoft-releases-smart-card-toolkit#commentsAnchorMon, 21 Mar 2005 21:22:49 GMT
add oil...]]>Anonymous User Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:22:49 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/installation2/microsoft-releases-smart-card-toolkit#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorMon, 20 Dec 2004 20:41:06 GMT
Well, since no one else pointed this out, if you search the MS KB, you’ll find a detailed article about how to edit the registry and allow .mdb or .exe files to be saved or opened from Outlook. I believe the information is here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;829982 Look Todd, it’s me!]]>Anonymous User Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:41:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorThu, 08 Jul 2004 14:57:54 GMT
Your Comments (required):Thanks for the info. It answered my question. I use Chapura, can you tell me how to avoid the message or remove the patch ?. Thanks again]]>Jesus Bilbao Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:57:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorWed, 05 May 2004 10:55:52 GMT
Whatever happened to this company and it’s promises to deliver large capacity disks? I have lightly researched other articles and the C3D.org website and find that there is a filesystem that is definitely different to what is in standard use so far. Problems? Funding? Maybe it’s just the old problem with companies having to deal with yet another storage format, or perhaps the economy has forced the project to take a back seat. I’m sure any, or all, of these reasons can be to blame for this product never making it to the marketplace. Sadly, I must resign myself to continue buying 7GB DVDs for storage at $23 each. I would like to have seen what this new medium would do for the multimedia and recording industry. Imagine the number of quality movies that could be recorded on a 1TB Disk. Shame that this design is on hold...hopefully it will resurface soon.]]>UX50 User Wed, 05 May 2004 10:55:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorMon, 12 Apr 2004 18:07:33 GMT
Is this what I need to get rid of a Trojan Virus now?]]>Cathy Harsh Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:07:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorThu, 08 Apr 2004 02:07:01 GMT
very good thank you sirs!!! 4/8/4]]>jimmie howard Thu, 08 Apr 2004 02:07:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorTue, 30 Mar 2004 20:25:15 GMT
I am new to surfing the web. There are times I am looking for certain products, services, and free trial packages which, I have a hard time finding. When I do reach a site there isn’t enough info for beginners. This article is very informative. Thank you]]>Nadine Holliman Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:25:15 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorSun, 07 Mar 2004 18:52:52 GMT
I hav bean to many site for A free VIRUS scan and never got true well I am trying this one now THANKS IN ADVANCE]]>Glendon Turner Sun, 07 Mar 2004 18:52:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Nov 2003 09:39:56 GMT
i want this sooo bad but it will probably be like £50 a cd :\]]>Chronic Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:39:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorFri, 14 Nov 2003 16:56:34 GMT
i think this is great]]>kimmyanderson Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:56:34 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-offers-free-y2k-virus-protection#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorSun, 02 Feb 2003 14:39:20 GMT
I am trying to network 3 computers at home. They are connected through a Netgear router which is in turn connected to a cable modem. All have internet access.One is running W2K with NTFS, another is W2K with FAT and the other has WIN98 with FAT32.The 2 with W2K can at least see the other 2, but can’t access files. The Win98 machine will not keep the configuration for sharing files and folders and for sharing printers. As soon as I click OK after selecting File and Print Sharing it asks for the "Disk Labeled Windows 98 second edition". After I do that and reboot I check for the File and Print Sharing and it’s been deselected. I’m at a loss. The other two at least show the computers in "Computers Near Me", but when I click on the computer icons it says it’s not accessible and that the "Network Path was not found". Any ideas? Thanks, ]]>AlSun, 02 Feb 2003 14:39:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorWed, 08 Jan 2003 15:20:38 GMT
I’m trying to network peer to peer windows2000pro as a server with win98 & mil as a client. i mapped the drive from the server but from the clients it asks for a password what password i have tried every thing i don’t really need security in the office everyone can have total access. How do i accomplish this?]]>MikeWed, 08 Jan 2003 15:20:38 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorTue, 22 Oct 2002 11:46:34 GMT
Excellent Site. Needed info on this quickly and it is presented neatly and easy to understand. however needed more info on NAS.]]>Karim Kazia Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:46:34 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorWed, 29 May 2002 20:55:52 GMT
Limit 10 PC’s in a peer to peer network??????? I currently have 40 PC’s networked peer to peer without any problems. This limit is bogus and should be further explained. The limit placed by MS is accessing 1 computer from more than 10 computers, at the same time. That is what it means. Of course, I guess not many homes have more than 10 computers on at the same time anyway, except for Bill.]]>JimpalaSS Wed, 29 May 2002 20:55:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorMon, 13 May 2002 04:05:42 GMT
I can now throw away my ZIP100 drive thanks guys, however I still have a PC that even though Microsoft Client is installed I still cant get the thing to start up so I can logon any ideas]]>Spideray Mon, 13 May 2002 04:05:42 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorSat, 09 Mar 2002 10:43:46 GMT
I installed Win2000 Pro on 1 pC with NTFS system, my 2nd Win98SE PC is not able to see the folders on the WIn200 PC. What do I have to do to able to share the folders beetween the two systems even though I shared them. Thanks ]]>Ash Modi Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:43:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorMon, 25 Feb 2002 11:41:06 GMT
Very comprehensive. gave me more info than I expected or thought about. Thanks]]>jack stoage Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:41:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Dec 2001 19:47:04 GMT
This was a GREAT article. I also searched and searched for networking two computers in Win2K. This article helped a lot! Thanks...]]>DavidWed, 19 Dec 2001 19:47:04 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorTue, 04 Dec 2001 23:02:41 GMT
Thanks for the walk-through...two hours of beating my head with no success, then found you site, in ten minutes the network was up and running!]]>Swerwe Boscado Tue, 04 Dec 2001 23:02:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorTue, 02 Oct 2001 10:26:06 GMT
IS it very difficult to do self study for MSCE Win2000 certifications? The books sold at the book stores. Is it suuficient to pass?]]>joeTue, 02 Oct 2001 10:26:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorWed, 12 Sep 2001 04:01:18 GMT
I have just set-up a W2K 100Mb Ethernet network. 3 PCs are connected to a hub in a star topology. I have assigned each PC an IP address and they can successfully communicate. The problem I am having is response times, e.g. when I try to browse the C:\Drive of PC 1 from PC 2, it takes a couple of seconds to open each directory level. This happens regardless of which PC you are browsing across the network. Any suggestions? Many Thanks. ]]>Steve Hoyle Wed, 12 Sep 2001 04:01:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorSat, 23 Jun 2001 08:27:27 GMT
Why do I have to re-enter the password, even though the ’Reconnect at Logon’ box was checked when the drive mapping was made. Is this a W2K glitch or did I miss something?]]>Ron Merrix Sat, 23 Jun 2001 08:27:27 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorMon, 14 May 2001 01:21:28 GMT
What a great article. Have you ever tried to find information thru Windows help or at Microsoft? Forget about it. I didn’t even get any hits when searching for "Home Network" or "Share internet connection". I am a new user to W2K Pro, a switch over from NT so I am not used to some of the new features and interface. I followed the article and had my 98 box and W2K box talking and sharing my printer, folders and DSL line in about 20 minutes. This is exactly the information I was looking for.

Thanks ]]>Steve Pfeifenroth Mon, 14 May 2001 01:21:28 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorWed, 18 Apr 2001 16:35:03 GMT
Why can’t some applications use UNC share names?]]>Beth Smith Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:35:03 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/mapping-a-network-drive#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorSat, 07 Apr 2001 19:08:31 GMT
Microsoft article Q258938 entitled "Network Clients Prompted for Password Connecting to Share on Windows 2000" provides a fix for the password problem. Go to :
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q258/9/38.ASP]]>Tom Stalvey Sat, 07 Apr 2001 19:08:31 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/windows-98-service-pack-1#commentsAnchorWed, 28 Mar 2001 18:51:39 GMT
I have windows 98se Atboot time the system freeze at the screen that says WINDOW98. What is the problem?]]>Jerry Stokes Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:51:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/windows-98-service-pack-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorSat, 10 Mar 2001 22:52:49 GMT
I networked a 2 computer using HPNA and one PC is running Win98 SE and the other is Windows 2000 Pro. Everything worked fine and the two computer is shown in the my network area. However, when I try to access the Windows 2000 computer via the Win 98 computer, it prompts me to enter a password before I can acess the Win 2K computer’s file. I did turn on unrestricted sharing in the Win 2k computer and it still ask me for a passwork. I do not know why! I can access the Windows 98 computer via the Win 2k computer. One more problem is that it takes a long time, about a minute or so to open the "Computers Near Me" and access the Windows 98 computer in the "My Network Places" icon. Is this normal or there is a fix? Can anybody please help me. Thanks You very much for your help!]]>Jason Niu Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:52:49 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Jan 2001 05:54:16 GMT
I must have done something wrong. Although I have my peer to peer working. I get an error upon restarting my W2K machine that a duplicate name exist on the network. I’m using Netbeui with W98 and W95 machines as my clients. I can not browse the internect from the client machines.]]>Kermit Wed, 17 Jan 2001 05:54:16 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorFri, 29 Dec 2000 06:28:21 GMT
i am trying to connect two win2k computers a & b directly using a rj45 patch cable. i can see the computer name a in computer a when i click the "computers near me" icon . but i cannot see the name of the computer b in computer b when i click "computers near me" icon , i get a message saying workgroup not accessible can you help me solve the problem]]>sekharFri, 29 Dec 2000 06:28:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorThu, 26 Oct 2000 18:47:15 GMT
If you have just two PC’s with network cards installed, then a simple RJ45 network crossover cable will work. A local computer shop can fix one up for you. Alternatively using BNC connectors if you have older style network cards, terminated on both ends. The info is good for new users.]]>Chris Booth Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:47:15 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/product-review/combo-cd-rw-dvd-rom-drive-coming#commentsAnchorWed, 25 Oct 2000 15:20:18 GMT
Can you tell me if the Toshiba SD-R1002 will work in my IBM Abtiva 166? Do I have to add any thing to my IBM to make it work? If so, what are the requirements? Thank you, ]]>John DeRuvo Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:20:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/product-review/combo-cd-rw-dvd-rom-drive-coming#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorThu, 21 Sep 2000 10:01:41 GMT
Easy to understand, brief, descriptive intro to these two technologies. This type of "info-blast" is what helps IT folks stay in touch with the field.]]>Randy Pineau Thu, 21 Sep 2000 10:01:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/storage/nas-vs-san#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorWed, 21 Jun 2000 00:08:09 GMT
I tried to home network 2 win2k machines everything went well I can see both thru the network. the only feature I could not get to function is the demand dial of internet connection sharing. I can get to the net from the client if I activate the connection manually on the host machine but it will not attempt to dial on its own even for a simple browsing session. I wondered if you had any insite on this issue?]]>Cliff Richman Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:08:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/home-networking-with-windows-2000-professional#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorMon, 19 Jun 2000 12:53:28 GMT
I find myself quite upset after applying the Outlook security patch - inadvertently, I might add. As a routine part of my job, I frequently send and receive Access (.mdb) files and self-extracting zip files. Now I flat out can’t receive them. I’m not an idiot and am perfectly capable of determining on my own whether or not I wish to receive these files, but Microsoft has removed any and all option. Not only that, but they’ve seen fit to make this patch non-removable. I’ve gone as far as to re-install Office, but the darn thing’s still with me. I just recently reformatted my hard drive and I don’t feel compelled to go through that again. I, as our company’s primary Microsoft proponent, have been strongly pushing our upper management to switch our corporate email client from Eudora to Outlook, but after this patch I think I may be me that switches from Outlook to Eudora.]]>Todd Hobdey Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:53:28 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorThu, 01 Jun 2000 09:03:10 GMT
Microsoft should include with Exchange Server the functionality to filter out certain file types at the Internet Mail Connector. This could be strengthened further by delivering the message to an alternate mailbox and sending a message to the intended recipient stating that an e-mail was sent to you that contains a file that is a possible security threat to the company network. Please see your administrator for further information. By diverting that message to another mailbox, the company could create a policy that would force the administrator to virus check the mailbox, and also access it from a PC that has no network rights and the PC is a worthless computer so that no data could be damaged. Furthermore whatever user id logs on to that mailbox where the possible virus is stored, that users permission should only have the ability read messages and not send messages so that the virus could not be spread through e-mail. I am sure Microsoft is doing something like this internally because I called them and their tech support said they were, but I had to call their per incident support and pay $250 to find out how.]]>Brad Shaffer Thu, 01 Jun 2000 09:03:10 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorTue, 30 May 2000 13:46:09 GMT
"The original suggestion for this patch came, not from a techie, but from US Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York in a US Senate Subcommittee hearing in the wake of Loveletter." In fact, many "techies" made the suggestion of object model protection for Outlook long before any congressional hearings. I don’t see why Cong. Weiner should be credited. Furthermore, the object model guard feature affects not just address book access but also any functions that send messages automatically. This means the update breaks many significant built-in features such as Net Folders and mail merge to e-mail via Microsoft Word. Your article lists companies whose products will be affected. This is not quite accurate. It would be better to say that these companies’ products "may" be affected. My company, like the others listed, will not be able to say exactly what will be affected until Microsoft releases the final version of this update.]]>Sue Mosher Tue, 30 May 2000 13:46:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorTue, 30 May 2000 13:41:00 GMT
1) "Microsoft now plans to include the ability to modify the list of restricted files." This ability will be there, but only as an administrative tool. Individual Windows NT and Windows 2000 users will not be able to remove file types from the list of restricted files. 2) "Many users send Visual Basic (VB) scripts, executables, batch files, and hyperlinks as part of their daily traffic." Hyperlinks, yes. Executables, maybe. Scripts and batch files as part of the daily traffic of many users, hardly. 3) "An IDC analyst pointed out that the patch would have killed many basic functions of Microsoft Internet Explorer, including JavaScript and VB script execution, and ActiveX calls." Simply not true. The Outlook patch was never designed to have any effect whatsoever on any functionality of Internet Explorer itself. 4) The author (along with many other writers, to be fair) completely misses the most important feature of the revised patch. From the Microsoft Office Update page at http://officeupdate.microsoft.com/2000/articles/Out2ksecOrg.htm "Organizations using server-based security can customize certain components of the update to meet their specific security needs. For example, administrators can add or remove file types from the attachment lists (the Level 1 and Level 2 security file lists), the Outlook Object Model warning notifications, and the user or group security levels for all components of this update." Being able to modify the restricted file type list is trivial compared with being able to alter the behavior of the Object Model Guard. In the patch as originally announced, the object model restrictions would have guaranteed that a large percentage of third-party and in-house Outlook applications would either stop working completely or have their functionality severely impaired. The changes announced mean that administrators can decide whether to allow unrestricted access to certain automation functions that their Outlook-dependent applications require. In other words, those applications won’t be crippled by the patch if administrators decide to allow access to certain object model features.]]>Sue Mosher Tue, 30 May 2000 13:41:00 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorFri, 26 May 2000 16:52:40 GMT
Being in the military and running a NT LAN that contains two Exchange Servers 5.5, this article was helpful. I always look forward to reading and keeping up with Exchange Server articles and FAQ’s. I did hear several people in the Military’s Information Systems Department discussing this patch. However, the appeared to rely on the first type of information released is the best and most reliable for their Military sites, without doing extensive research that requires planning and testing before the deployment. This particular article allows myself to discuss the information with my superiors and will allow them to provide adequate answers to their superiors. Thanks for the article and look forward to hear about the June release of this patch. ]]>Thomas Gonzalez Fri, 26 May 2000 16:52:40 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorFri, 26 May 2000 16:01:58 GMT
I’d agree with comments related to installation of this fix. It also seems to be very radical. Maybe allowing users to select which options to enable/disable would be a more natural approach. On the other side, most users know very little about computers and Outlook itself and would find these options too much. They just want their "thing" to work. I think the answer lies more in educating and instructing users on what and how to do things. Microsoft has gone a long way to create such a powerfull tool. A lot of things users freaquently do seem to happen so easily in Outlook. Why take that away? Teach them what viruses do and how to defend themselves from it. That’s much better fix than any. In my opinion, Outlook is target of malicious attacks these days only because it’s so user friendly and so popular. Other applications of this sort should actually be worried that "geniousis" didn’t make virus version for their applications as well. Thank you.]]>Rajko Bogdanovic Fri, 26 May 2000 16:01:58 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/microsoft-criticized-for-outlook-love-bug-patch-changes-tune#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorThu, 25 May 2000 04:41:53 GMT
The headline to this article is misleading. I knew that Microsoft *planned* to release a patch this week. This article headline made me think that this patch had now been released. It would have saved all of us a bit of time if the headline would be "Imminent Release of Outlook patch after recent viruses" or similar until such time as the patch is indeed released at which time you can make that fact clear in your header e.g. "Outlook patch now released" ]]>Mike Walsh Thu, 25 May 2000 04:41:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/outlook-patched-after-recent-viruses#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorSun, 30 Apr 2000 15:00:53 GMT
Where in the world is one able to obtain the study aids/material to enable one to prepare for the upgrade exam by December 2000?]]>Bobby Blake Sun, 30 Apr 2000 15:00:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/first-round-of-windows-2000-patches-released#commentsAnchorWed, 01 Mar 2000 13:28:16 GMT
Good site. Lots of info.]]>dennisWed, 01 Mar 2000 13:28:16 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/first-round-of-windows-2000-patches-released#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/windows-2000-launches-finally-#commentsAnchorSat, 19 Feb 2000 21:54:16 GMT
I haven’t had my Win 2K on my hard - drive for 3 days and now I hear the Win 2K/64 is coming out. Wonder what the upgrade will cost for this? I’m not complaining - quite happy in fact to spend $300 after running RC1 in november and deciding there and then my plan would be to upgrade to Win 2K and be committed. I’m so committed in fact I’ve done without my $2000 Epson Scanner (1995) due to a lack of Win 2K device drivers and am hoping/waiting for Epson to get back to me within 6 months or less so I can hook it up to my SCSI card and have it work. Win 2K even recognizes the processor inside the scanner but lacks the driver to run it. I’m hooked!! (Using Dell P2-266/ 440 LX Intel motherboard and 128 MB Ram - only has APM support not the new ACPI).]]>Ross P Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:54:16 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/windows-2000-launches-finally-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/microsoft-outlines-new-win2k-security-strategy#commentsAnchorThu, 10 Feb 2000 20:16:13 GMT
Too fluffy, where’s the testing of the beta? What, dosen’t anybody there know a good hacker? What about trying some of those security breaches newly patched in NT on W2K? Just a thought... ]]>Lane Monk Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:16:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/microsoft-outlines-new-win2k-security-strategy#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/intel-spouts-dual-speed-laptop-chip#commentsAnchorWed, 09 Feb 2000 15:35:24 GMT
Thanks for the clarification on this one. Sounds like a duel-speed chip only sounds like a good idea. It would be more cost effective as well as time effective to simply take an extra battery along for the ride. Something that many of us have been doing already. I’m sure Intel will sucker a few un-informed masses into buying the idea. Better them than me.]]>PaulWed, 09 Feb 2000 15:35:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/intel-spouts-dual-speed-laptop-chip#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-issues-response-to-doj-s-findings-of-fact#commentsAnchorThu, 27 Jan 2000 10:07:13 GMT
I don’t see what the big deal is over IE. I have run both browsers at work and at home. IE is better for somethings, and Netscape is better for others. I got both of them for free!!! So what’s the point? In the begining Mediaone said use Netscape, the a few years later, now say use IE. I use whichever one I please.]]>mimi biro Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:07:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-issues-response-to-doj-s-findings-of-fact#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-issues-response-to-doj-s-findings-of-fact#commentsAnchorTue, 25 Jan 2000 05:10:52 GMT
Technical Innovation!...]]>yunpalTue, 25 Jan 2000 05:10:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-issues-response-to-doj-s-findings-of-fact#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/product-review/adaptec-releases-first-160mbps-scsi-cards#commentsAnchorSun, 16 Jan 2000 10:39:51 GMT
I’ve recently purchased 3-ea Adaptec AHA2940U2W Adapter that will be arriving by DHL shipment tomorrow or Tuesday. What do I need to do to upgrade to the Ultra-160? I was not aware of this update when I purchased these adapters a few weeks ago. Please advise the soonest, because these units are new, never been opened or used and still in the original packaging. Thanking you in advance for your time and assistance. Best Regards, ]]>James A. Mariner, Sr. Sun, 16 Jan 2000 10:39:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/product-review/adaptec-releases-first-160mbps-scsi-cards#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorWed, 05 Jan 2000 00:58:17 GMT
If this product is compatible with current products such as CD and DVD ROMs and similer in price, it will fly!!]]>MaxWed, 05 Jan 2000 00:58:17 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorTue, 04 Jan 2000 09:36:09 GMT
Nice going Sun. Some folks never learn... (Apple, NeXT... good technology, but they held on too tightly). Most people are shying away from Java because it’s slow, and the apps are fairly ugly (the Windowing system isn’t as pretty). [Looks don’t matter? What about the technically superior OS/2?]. And this is what you do... stifle the creation of a standard? This is sad. Java will not now be able to realize all that people had hoped of it (pervasiveness). It will be relegated to a niche technology.]]>Terrance McQuilkin Tue, 04 Jan 2000 09:36:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorThu, 30 Dec 1999 18:21:56 GMT
I think the Headline for the article was incorrect. A more appropriate heading might have been "Sun Abandons ECMA’s attempts to steal their JAVA Copyright, and politely show’s them the Door" WOW, the self-annointed politico’s are gonna get mad, and...and...and, write their own. Should be in Beta Release by 2010 :-)]]>M L Owen Thu, 30 Dec 1999 18:21:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorWed, 29 Dec 1999 16:52:48 GMT
This is no surprise to me. Everyone is fighting over money. But my question is this: will be able to keep programming java allets or programs with the software already purchased?]]>Dave Hurley Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:52:48 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/jscript/sun-abandons-java-standard#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/sql-server-2000-announced#commentsAnchorSun, 26 Dec 1999 17:28:39 GMT
Interesting article, but doesn’t delve deep in the software characterstics, it speaks more of what MS promises than of what users have been waiting for. Could be more informative or otherwise link to deeper analysis pages.]]>vruz Sun, 26 Dec 1999 17:28:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/sql-server-2000-announced#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorTue, 07 Dec 1999 13:50:06 GMT
Though I will be happy for the increase in size, they make no mention of addressing the main problem I had with CDROMs in the first place: that of slow access times.]]>Rich M Tue, 07 Dec 1999 13:50:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/140gb-cd-rom-to-debut-next-year-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-offers-hosted-office-2000#commentsAnchorSun, 28 Nov 1999 02:54:12 GMT
Okay, here’s my two cents worth... 1) Referring to ASP’s as a "revolution" was funny, even for normal marketing fluff. Thanks for the laugh. 2) Microsoft’s increasingly bloated applications are slow enough when run locally. Networked, they’re painful when run over even a 100Meg LAN. We’re going to run them over an Internet connection... which is most commonly a T1? As if. 3) Microsoft is well-known for its... "creative" ways of profiling its largely captive audience. It’ll be a cold day in hot places before I deliver that level of customer control to Microsoft on the silver platter they’re seeking with this move. Since you asked. :-)]]>Patrick Sweeney Sun, 28 Nov 1999 02:54:12 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/microsoft-offers-hosted-office-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorTue, 23 Nov 1999 05:41:59 GMT
Please continue this line of articles. Anything that involves MicroSoft’s legal entanglements has a very direct bearing on my job as a NT System Administrator. Knowing the factors affecting the probable direction of Microsoft OS development is just as important as knowing the enhancements to DNS or anyother technical aspect.]]>Terence E. Shelton Tue, 23 Nov 1999 05:41:59 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 1999 17:05:39 GMT
Am I the only one that finds it just a bit interesting that Novell’s former CEO is the one filing this suit? As stated in the article, he purchased DR-DOS (i.e. Novell sold it to him) specifically so he could pursue the suit. While there is nothing wrong with that, doesn’t it seem odd that the top executive for one of Microsoft’s leading competitors would leave the company and then decide to acquire one of it’s products solely to take Microsoft to court? It sounds to me more like Novell didn’t want to endure possible negative publicity and still get a dig in on Microsoft. So, given this perspective isn’t overly paranoid, who wins and who loses if ruling is in favor of Canopy Group? Well, obviously Canopy Group would have a good positive number on their books for next year and Ray Noorda would be playing a few extra rounds of golf or buying that new summer house he always wanted. The losers, on the other hand, we would get to absorb the 1.8 billion in Microsoft’s potential losses via higher licensing fees; slower response or through whatever means Microsoft decided to recoup its losses. Oh and just as a side note, I was one of those people back in the early 90’s (92 that is) that switched from DR-DOS 6 to MS-DOS 5 not because of any Windows 3.1 issues or even issues with other Microsoft products. I switched because of all the other software vendors that must have been writting code that made their programs crash if it detected DR-DOS also. It’s funny because I remember at the time thinking how great it was that all my software just seemed to work after installing MS-DOS when the whole time I used DR-DOS applications kept dying or would always seem to have some weird problem. Fact is that I believe DR-DOS had some problems as it was. If Microsoft took advantage of those problemss in an incorrect way then shame on them. But, looking back, I wouldn’t have continued using DR-DOS anyway because most software companies wouldn’t or didn’t know how to support it well.]]>Jerry Schliephake Mon, 22 Nov 1999 17:05:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 1999 15:37:03 GMT
What a way to invest Ray...]]>afeiner Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:37:03 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 1999 14:57:56 GMT
ENOUGH! Microsoft bad, everyone else good? Come on, MS got rid of DOS because it wnated to get rid of DR-DOS? Oh I suppose the fact that it was non-Y2K complaint and a waste development energy is beside the point. MS didn’t single out DR developers, it simply didn’t help them any because it was headed into Windows 95. Get a life! I don’t like some of MS bullying tactics but this looks just as bad as anything Ms ever did!]]>Morgan Hammac Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:57:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 1999 14:08:10 GMT
Microsoft has been declared a monopoly by Judge Jackson. This is going to help Caldera a lot. It seems like Microsoft is going down. Don’t you also forget the biggest threat from linux. ]]>David Lang Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:08:10 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/caldera-s-antitrust-lawsuit-against-microsoft-will-go-to-trial#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/licensing/windows-2000-s-hefty-price#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Nov 1999 06:34:32 GMT
It is my interpretation that Microsoft is targeting Windows "Millenium" as the upgrade path for the Win9x home user. Windows 2000 Professional is the suggested replacement for NT Workstation.]]>Chris Weider Wed, 17 Nov 1999 06:34:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/licensing/windows-2000-s-hefty-price#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/vbs-bubbleboy-email-worm-appears#commentsAnchorWed, 10 Nov 1999 20:49:00 GMT
Whilst it is great that you should bring the potential threat of this radically new virus to the attention of your users, it perhaps would have been more helpful to have been more specific on just who is likely to be affected by this - rather than going for the journalistic apoproach of scaring the hell out of everyone ! . To that end I attach a few sentences from the Symantec NAV website at http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/vbs.bubbleboy.html VBS.BubbleBoy is a worm that works under Windows 98 and Windows 2000. The worm will also work under Windows 95 only if the Windows Scripting Host is installed. The worm will only work with the English and Spanish versions of the operating systems, and not with Windows NT. Microsoft Outlook (or Express) with Internet Explorer 5 must be used in order for the worm to propagate. Regards Mike]]>Mike Lee Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:49:00 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/vbs-bubbleboy-email-worm-appears#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/vbs-bubbleboy-email-worm-appears#commentsAnchorWed, 10 Nov 1999 20:06:14 GMT
The article would be great if the link to MS had anything to do with VBS/Bubbleboy Email Worm]]>roger riediger Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:06:14 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/vbs-bubbleboy-email-worm-appears#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Oct 1999 12:51:37 GMT
Thanks for the excellent article on open source software. I just had one little inaccuracy to point out. Although the Mozilla project has had some delays (namely because they scrapped the old codebase which was deemed unworkable and rewrote it from the ground up), it’s not suffering from bloated code at all. Current download footprint for the entire win32 browser (including code and data) is 788k compressed. That’s including browser, mail, news, and other stuff as well. You should try a recent milestone release or nightly build. It’s stabilizing rapidly and more and more people are using it. The reason more people didn’t flock to the project early on was because the code Netscape released wasn’t usable. As Mozilla reaches feature complete and stablizes, more people will use it as their primary browser, which will result in more bugs found and fixed. It’s kind of a snowball effect. When you release a _huge_ open source package that’s badly broken and won’t run at all, only a few hardcore people will work on it, but as it becomes more usable, more and more people will use it, accellerating the rate of bugs found and fixed.]]>Jesse Michael Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:51:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Oct 1999 07:07:29 GMT
Your article states that there are rumors that Apple is releasing part of their OS as open source, but this was done some time ago: http://www.publicsource.apple.com/ This is MacOS X, however, and not MacOS 8 or 9. They are very different things, and I don’t think there are any plans to release the source for older MacOS versions. You also mentioned Windows CE - even if Microsoft doesn’t release it as open source, there are already efforts underway to bring Linux to CE devices. They have successfully booted the OS on SH3 and MIPS devices, and even run some user-space programs: http://www.linuxce.org/]]>Brian Jepson Thu, 28 Oct 1999 07:07:29 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Oct 1999 04:53:52 GMT
Regarding the Mozzila project: You really should take a closer look at the web site, and see "why" there is a delay. The delay is not in dealing with bloated source per se, but instead dumping the bloated source in favor of starting from scratch. Some of the major articles on that site explain this in much greater detail. The final product which Mozzila.org will produce is something that the consumer has not seem before. It will be more like the familiar Russel Stover’s Candies, in that a lot of the little buggers look the same, but there are a few that are really terrific on the inside. Similarly, Mozzila will have many of the features that the previous incarnation has (a la netscape), but the inside is a lot better than before. One of the major things which its boasts is a new layout engine called Raptor, and from direct personal experience with the milestone 10 release of Mozilla, there is a significant and noticable speed difference between netscape and mozzila (the latter I thought was at least 2X faster than the former). So please look at the site, and if possible make a correction to your article!]]>Michael Hay Thu, 28 Oct 1999 04:53:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Oct 1999 01:58:48 GMT
Mozilla started off slow and bloated because it was based on released Netscape sources (the product of closed development), not because it is open source. Since then, it’s been through a ground-up rewrite, and is much less bloated. However, the mnemonic browser project, which has been open source from day one, is cleaner and clearer.]]>Bill Baxter Thu, 28 Oct 1999 01:58:48 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/dispatches-from-the-open-source-front#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/energy-industry-gushes-over-windows-2000#commentsAnchorTue, 05 Oct 1999 05:29:19 GMT
Mr. Pohlman doesn’t discuss the cost of this migration from Unix to Win2K. He also doesn’t give specifics of why Win2K is suddenly so popular in the Energy Industry. There is actually nothing in the article other than the Energy industry is behaving like Lemmings and blindly following someone to the cliff. I have seen one survey where the cost of upgrading to Win2K was between 1-3K per workstation. This is at the high end, but I would expect when the costs are tabulated (software+install+training+time) the costs are going to be higher than anticipated. Eric Christeson - US Army Exchange Site Administrator]]>Eric Christeson Tue, 05 Oct 1999 05:29:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/energy-industry-gushes-over-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/energy-industry-gushes-over-windows-2000#commentsAnchorTue, 05 Oct 1999 00:39:43 GMT
Winnt Mag is above reprinting press releases as news. Please try not to fall into the ZD Net mentality. It’s the reason I buy your magazine every month and not Windows User. Andrew van der Stock]]>Andrew van der Stock Tue, 05 Oct 1999 00:39:43 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/energy-industry-gushes-over-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorFri, 01 Oct 1999 16:27:20 GMT
One thing to clarify about the W2K MCSE track: If you’ve passed an elective as part of the NT 4.0 track, that same elective will count towards your W2K MCSE. There was some confusion about this at first but it has been confirmed by Microsoft. Therefore if you’re a current NT 4.0 MCSE (or have simply passed the three NT 4.0 exams) you will only need two exams to update your certification. Electives that retire (e.g. IIS 3.0 on June 30, 2000) will need to be updated of course. Michael DeBussy, MCSETutor.com]]>Michael DeBussy Fri, 01 Oct 1999 16:27:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorFri, 01 Oct 1999 09:17:54 GMT
Nothing new in Microsoft & MSCE. I passed three of them. MSCE is’t in puropse of knowledge and skills, anyway. Those silly question and silly scenario are just tool how to ripp off people and make revenue to MS. They do not care for knowledge and education. Otherwise, there would not do what they are doing. According to MS, it appeared that IT industry is eagger and waiting to 2000 like a mad. The true is there are still plenty of NT 3.5 or even people use just 95/98 everybody hate MS just because their policy. Who know when 2000 will be enterprise ready. I get started to hate them, too. I would like to the end of Microsoft as company and it’s monopol in this industry and to see end of this silly certificate, as well.]]>Ahmed Kusturica Fri, 01 Oct 1999 09:17:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/training-and-certification2/microsoft-announces-new-windows-2000-mcse-track#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchorSun, 19 Sep 1999 20:52:57 GMT
Short, to the point. It would be better if there was a bit more detail.]]>Pascal Sala Sun, 19 Sep 1999 20:52:57 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchorFri, 27 Aug 1999 03:30:00 GMT
NT4 Service Pack 6 An interesting article with no real point as the beta is not yet released. btw, the main page link -->http://www.winntmag.com/News/NewsStory.cfm?Ne does not work]]>Larry Price Fri, 27 Aug 1999 03:30:00 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/desktop-management/is-neptune-a-sea-of-change-for-windows-#commentsAnchorWed, 11 Aug 1999 10:12:51 GMT
I hope Neptune is the true 32-bit code we’ve been hoping for, but with Microsoft’s track record of late, I have my doubts. I know of very few games which run under NT, due to what I understand is the complexity of coding with the NT API’s in order to effectively run today’s highly graphic oriented games. My thinking is that with the Linux push (and I run Linux as well as NT) that is occuring, Linux may well become the new gamer OS. If that is indeed the case, then Microsoft will be hard pressed to intice the gaming industry to code for Neptune. Gaming is truly what drives the home PC market; look at the types of systems being purchased for home versus what is running in the office. My home systems far and away run rings around my office systems, simply because my home pc’s are tweaked for games. Just my 2 cents]]>Dwayne Sudduth Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:12:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/desktop-management/is-neptune-a-sea-of-change-for-windows-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/desktop-management/is-neptune-a-sea-of-change-for-windows-#commentsAnchorWed, 11 Aug 1999 02:11:04 GMT
Good article, good detail and bleeding edge too. Good work]]>Brad Spearman Wed, 11 Aug 1999 02:11:04 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/desktop-management/is-neptune-a-sea-of-change-for-windows-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/will-amd-s-k7-scale-new-heights-#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Aug 1999 20:11:37 GMT
Very informative... I also like the links. I am an intermediate user growing more with articles like this... Thanks!]]>LD Lewis Tue, 03 Aug 1999 20:11:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/will-amd-s-k7-scale-new-heights-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/will-amd-s-k7-scale-new-heights-#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Aug 1999 15:11:30 GMT
I am glad to see reporting of the "other runners" in this chip race. AMD’s presence has kept the competition pressure on Intel, and the winner is the consumer. AMD has bled a lot in this process. Let us pray that they can stay the course.]]>Ji m Nelson Tue, 03 Aug 1999 15:11:30 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/will-amd-s-k7-scale-new-heights-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/new-back-orifice-virus-may-threaten-nt#commentsAnchorMon, 02 Aug 1999 14:54:10 GMT
Orifice is called a "virus" ? Hmmm you might need to look up on definitions on computer terms.]]>MitchMon, 02 Aug 1999 14:54:10 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/antivirus/new-back-orifice-virus-may-threaten-nt#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchorMon, 02 Aug 1999 06:46:35 GMT
windows nt server 4.0 documents about administration]]>Elvyn Ventura Sosa Mon, 02 Aug 1999 06:46:35 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/service-pack-6-for-windows-nt-4-0-goes-beta#commentsAnchor