http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5777508/rsscomment/5777508en-USSun, 27 May 2012 07:29:37 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 07:29:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/collaboration/business-applications92690#commentsAnchorFri, 18 May 2012 09:25:20 GMT
Thank you for posting these software links. I have not heard of a few of these before. I really like epicor consulting software that I have and I ave been looking for a software to supplement it for another department in my business. You have given me some great ideas!]]>MoeyFri, 18 May 2012 09:25:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/collaboration/business-applications92690#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorMon, 02 Apr 2012 03:47:09 GMT
my casing the hotel was respectable, but not distractingly so. The classroom was at the hotel CCIE security Certification you took your tests at the hotel, they brought the food in, there were teem ingress of snacks and drinks all the instance. CCNP security Certification They prefab it as undemanding as pie to rivet on zilch but deed your MCSE in 14 days and leaving with the concepts you required. No "essay MCSE's" e'er walked out of mine or any of my individual's classes or we would spot CCVP Certification ]]>natashaMon, 02 Apr 2012 03:47:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/what-s-new-in-sql-server-2008-#commentsAnchorMon, 12 Dec 2011 19:49:05 GMT
For me, using IE8, the video link seems to default to the homepage. Can someone confirm the video is no longer viewable? This would be ashame. As SQL 2005 is no longer supported and 2012 has just been released many will be looking to upgrade/migrate, more likely to 2008. Thanks.]]>Donna CollinsMon, 12 Dec 2011 19:49:05 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/what-s-new-in-sql-server-2008-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/review/2010-windows-it-pro-editors-best-and-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorWed, 31 Aug 2011 14:17:18 GMT
HI there, The latest edition of Etrust Internet Security Suite (Compuer Associates) has been reviewed by our experts. (Aug. 2011) No support for individual computer users with their outsourced technical support. Complex for the average user. Lots of problems installing. Can slow down your computer. Read our latest comments: http://www.all-internet-security.com/computer_associates_etrust.html I hope this helps. Charles Collins Editor-in-chief ]]>Charles CollinsWed, 31 Aug 2011 14:17:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/review/2010-windows-it-pro-editors-best-and-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/installation2/installer-software#commentsAnchorMon, 30 May 2011 02:51:03 GMT
imho, the best software installer for Windows is Actual Installer. www.actualinstaller.com/]]>ArturMon, 30 May 2011 02:51:03 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/installation2/installer-software#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/high-availability/uptime-trending-from-stratus-technologies#commentsAnchorTue, 21 Dec 2010 14:30:13 GMT
Wouldn’t it have been better to compare the cost of an average server’s downtime? At 99.9% that would be 8 hours and 46 minutes or $946,800 per year. So, the ftServer would save %944,100? Now that’s some return on investment.

BTW - the meter is at 99.99976 today]]>TerryTue, 21 Dec 2010 14:30:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/high-availability/uptime-trending-from-stratus-technologies#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/registry-management-tool43638#commentsAnchorTue, 14 Dec 2010 19:49:11 GMT
Amazing article with a lot of useful information, actually, recently I’ve found another way to speed up my poor PC, the software "tuneup360". Its very easy to handle and of course very powerful, my friends and I all use it now, maybe you can have a try.
]]>liang shuilianTue, 14 Dec 2010 19:49:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/registry-management-tool43638#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/2009-windows-it-pro-editors-best-and-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorTue, 09 Nov 2010 23:14:56 GMT
It is good if you people are doing such activity.
Spiceworks is good tool. I herd from many people about it now I will definitely use it.
__________________________
Lifted Nissan Trucks]]>heavenTue, 09 Nov 2010 23:14:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/2009-windows-it-pro-editors-best-and-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/buyers-guide/tape-backup-hardware#commentsAnchorMon, 15 Mar 2010 11:22:38 GMT
I am a Digital Specialist here at Iron Mountain, we specialize in helping Companies reduce the Risk, Cost, and Complexity of managing their Digital Information. My role is to simply Facilitate an Introduction to New Technology. Please Reach out to me if you believe our services may be of help to your organization. The following link is a nice highlevel overview of the services Iron Mountain Digital offers:
https://www.brainshark.com/ironmountain/vu?pi=220538630]]>nickMon, 15 Mar 2010 11:22:38 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/buyers-guide/tape-backup-hardware#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/web-exclusive-vendor-briefings-june-2006#commentsAnchorSun, 07 Feb 2010 13:37:32 GMT
Bopup Communication Server is another IM software designed for internal, secure and business use. Offers a great interface to manage instant messaging with a searchable archiving & logging. http://www.blabsoft.com/products/server/]]>IvanSun, 07 Feb 2010 13:37:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/web-exclusive-vendor-briefings-june-2006#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software43671#commentsAnchorTue, 15 Dec 2009 17:39:56 GMT
I don’t think we have a newer Buyer’s Guide on this topic, but you can find more help desk coverage here: http://windowsitpro.com/search/index.cfm?Action=Search&qtype=kws&incdocsets=3&sortby=date&advanced=&qs=%22help %20desk%22 We’ll keep this subject in mind for future coverage. Thanks. Zac Wiggy Windows IT Pro]]>ZacTue, 15 Dec 2009 17:39:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software43671#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software43671#commentsAnchorTue, 15 Dec 2009 10:53:42 GMT
Is there an update to this article? It has been 5 years...]]>KEVINTue, 15 Dec 2009 10:53:42 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software43671#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server-2005/the-right-way-to-calculate-a-leap-year-birthday-#commentsAnchorTue, 10 Nov 2009 00:46:13 GMT
--This is the tested proc which will take care of leap year and other things --So test it Now............................................................ ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[CalculateYearMonthDays] @FromDate datetime,@ToDate datetime AS DECLARE @ThisDate datetime DECLARE @years int, @months int, @days int SELECT @ThisDate = DATEADD(year, DATEDIFF(year, @FromDate, @ToDate), @FromDate) SELECT @years = DATEDIFF(year, @FromDate, @ToDate) - (CASE WHEN @ThisDate > @ToDate THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) SELECT @months = MONTH(@ToDate - @ThisDate) - 1 SELECT @days = DAY(@ToDate - @ThisDate) - 1 SELECT @years As ’Year’, @months As ’Month’, @days As ’Days’]]>ShailendraTue, 10 Nov 2009 00:46:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server-2005/the-right-way-to-calculate-a-leap-year-birthday-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorFri, 16 Oct 2009 17:11:51 GMT
Your Comments (required):]]>Name (required): Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:11:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/connections-2008-what-if-you-ran-microsoft-#commentsAnchorMon, 07 Sep 2009 01:03:33 GMT
This is Georgehanee thanks for submit this nice informative article, this is really nice article. Acne]]>GeorgeMon, 07 Sep 2009 01:03:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/connections-2008-what-if-you-ran-microsoft-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/quota-management-software47324#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Jun 2009 08:15:17 GMT
Is that the whole article ?]]>FerasWed, 17 Jun 2009 08:15:17 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/quota-management-software47324#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/sharepoint-beyond-the-first-mile#commentsAnchorWed, 03 Dec 2008 11:41:08 GMT
an alternative to using value added sharepoint solutions (value addition by an intermediate means more costs), is to try collaboration solutions specifically targeted to SMBs, which offer the same functionality, but have been designed from a users perspective. HyperOffice is one such solution.]]>PankajWed, 03 Dec 2008 11:41:08 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/sharepoint-beyond-the-first-mile#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/connections-2008-what-if-you-ran-microsoft-#commentsAnchorSun, 16 Nov 2008 10:47:45 GMT
Absolutely dump Vista - then dump that idiot Ballmer and finally dump Microsoft Arabia. The number of brain cells in that organisation total 0! Absolute rubbish!]]>AshleighSun, 16 Nov 2008 10:47:45 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/connections-2008-what-if-you-ran-microsoft-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/got-a-question-ask-microsoft-#commentsAnchorSun, 02 Nov 2008 12:41:15 GMT
I have WinXP, and until today my speakers (Hyundai surround system) worked fine. Now I can’t listen to anything, as my computer cannot find to sound device at all. I tried reinstalling the drivers, but it didn’t work. I have Intel(R) 82801GB SMBus Controller - 27DA reporing an error. Also, Bluetooth AV Audio and Bluetooth SCO Audio (both from IVT Corporation) report the same error. What can cause such a problem?]]>SandraSun, 02 Nov 2008 12:41:15 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/got-a-question-ask-microsoft-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters99285#commentsAnchorThu, 02 Oct 2008 09:55:34 GMT
Thanks for your feedback, Gary. Here’s Eric Rux’s response: "It looks like Gary is right: the Vista version of the defrag tool CAN defrag the MFT. I stand corrected."]]>AnneThu, 02 Oct 2008 09:55:34 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters99285#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/network-attached-storage43647#commentsAnchorSun, 28 Sep 2008 23:00:47 GMT
please send me this article]]>nachiketSun, 28 Sep 2008 23:00:47 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/network-attached-storage43647#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software40174#commentsAnchorSat, 20 Sep 2008 15:41:53 GMT
Polar Help Desk is a great web-based helpdesk solution intended for small businesses who need to organize or improve their customer support. With clear user-friendly interface and rich features it becomes a perfect solution for every company. Download the free version now. It’s fully featured and free for commercial usage, 1 technician and unlimited end users. For more information visit http://www.polarsoftware.com]]>polarSat, 20 Sep 2008 15:41:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/help-desk-software40174#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters99285#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Sep 2008 21:17:09 GMT
Eric’s comments on defrag are not accurate, with regards to Windows Vista. Please note Microsoft KB article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942092/en-us - Gary McPherson]]>GaryWed, 17 Sep 2008 21:17:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters99285#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/deployment/windows-it-pro-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorMon, 08 Sep 2008 08:28:02 GMT
ioj]]>StephanMon, 08 Sep 2008 08:28:02 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/deployment/windows-it-pro-community-choice-awards#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/sql-server-magazine-editors-best-awards-2008#commentsAnchorWed, 20 Aug 2008 12:32:04 GMT
@ wallsvp: Thanks for the kind words. Are there certain aspects of the awards issue that you liked more than others? We’re always looking for reader feedback on our awards programs, so let me know what you think. You can also email me directly at jjames [@] windowsitpro.com if you prefer. Thanks - - Jeff]]>JeffWed, 20 Aug 2008 12:32:04 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/sql-server-magazine-editors-best-awards-2008#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/sql-server-magazine-editors-best-awards-2008#commentsAnchorThu, 31 Jul 2008 14:49:13 GMT
Very nice, informative review w/o any hype.]]>WallyThu, 31 Jul 2008 14:49:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/sql-server-magazine-editors-best-awards-2008#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorWed, 30 Jul 2008 09:50:09 GMT
As we move toward the "Connected Home" we can learn much from the path taken by large enterprise. Where once enterprise networks were comprised of myriad PCs networked together, (a nightmare for even the best IT staff to manage) today we find datacenters. The current connected home ’solutions’ are likewise made up of individual products, often from multiple suppliers/providers, scattered throughout the home. Managing these diverse products presents the home owner and service provider with same problems experienced by those earlier enterprise IT staffs. What is required is a comprehensive datacenter solution for the home.]]>Tom Orr Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:50:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorWed, 23 Jul 2008 20:57:24 GMT
nice]]>alexWed, 23 Jul 2008 20:57:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Jun 2008 09:00:19 GMT
hi]]>sasif Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:00:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Jun 2008 08:59:44 GMT
nddlda]]>sasif Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:59:44 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/free-break-in-tools#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/active-directory-management-tool#commentsAnchorThu, 29 May 2008 01:39:29 GMT
jgk,mh]]>SherinThu, 29 May 2008 01:39:29 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/active-directory-management-tool#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorTue, 20 May 2008 11:48:21 GMT
IMHO, that is.]]>CarolineTue, 20 May 2008 11:48:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorTue, 20 May 2008 11:47:21 GMT
It was staged.]]>CarolineTue, 20 May 2008 11:47:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorTue, 20 May 2008 11:36:53 GMT
What was it? 3 eggs? And the guy missed? Luckily for Ballmer he wasn’t in the US. Any adequate baseball player wouldn’t of missed his big body.]]>ebraiter@videotron.ca Tue, 20 May 2008 11:36:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorTue, 20 May 2008 11:08:41 GMT
Ballmer deserves more eggs and tomatos with his performance as the president of Microsoft. He is the best second man but as it has been seen, not a successful first man.]]>MuratTue, 20 May 2008 11:08:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/ballmer-gets-egged#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/software-deployment-tool#commentsAnchorSat, 17 May 2008 08:46:07 GMT
good]]>jamesSat, 17 May 2008 08:46:07 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/software-deployment-tool#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorMon, 12 May 2008 10:04:32 GMT
@Cobra: Thanks Cobra! If you ever have any feedback or input on our New & Improved section, feel free to email me directly at jjames[at]windowsitpro.com. - Jeff James]]>Jeff JamesMon, 12 May 2008 10:04:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorThu, 01 May 2008 11:34:01 GMT
Cobra, thanks for the feedback, and thanks for reading! I’m glad you find the content useful. Let me know if there are any tech topics you’d like to see covered in Windows IT Pro.]]>AnneThu, 01 May 2008 11:34:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorThu, 01 May 2008 00:22:31 GMT
Awesome stuff here. Thanks!]]>KevinThu, 01 May 2008 00:22:31 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/new-and-improved#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/so-you-want-to-be-an-it-rockstar-#commentsAnchorTue, 01 Apr 2008 15:18:30 GMT
Man we could have alot of fun with this format. Gave me a good laugh. And maybe we can pull another one of Bobby Zimmerman’s lines and say to some of the third party software Vendors "You’ve gotta lota nerve, to say your are my friend", When I was down (Server crashed) and you just stood there grinnen". /:> Curt Spanburgh]]>CURTTue, 01 Apr 2008 15:18:30 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/so-you-want-to-be-an-it-rockstar-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorTue, 19 Feb 2008 10:32:51 GMT
Hi kgottfredsen, You’re right, Quest Coefficient for SQL Server doesn’t support SQL Server 2005. We apologize for this error, it was inadvertent. Because the award was given in 2006, the fact that Quest Coefficient doesn’t support SQL Server 2005 doesn’t affect the validity of the award. At the time, most DBAs were still using earlier versions of SQL Server. Thanks for pointing out this error. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Megan Bearly Associate Editor, SQL Server Magazine mbearly@sqlmag.com]]>meganbearly Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:32:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/setting-different-password-policies-for-different-groups#commentsAnchorFri, 15 Feb 2008 15:04:16 GMT
Testing Security Pro VIP]]>ChristanFri, 15 Feb 2008 15:04:16 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/setting-different-password-policies-for-different-groups#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/thin-client43534#commentsAnchorFri, 15 Feb 2008 11:12:42 GMT
CraSmi, you should be able to read the entire article now. Sorry you encountered this problem, and thanks for pointing it out to us!]]>AnneFri, 15 Feb 2008 11:12:42 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/thin-client43534#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/thin-client43534#commentsAnchorThu, 14 Feb 2008 15:14:01 GMT
I am logged in as a registered reader but there is no link to read the rest of the article. I can only see the first paragraph. This is true for the first 3 articles I tried to read.]]>CRAIGThu, 14 Feb 2008 15:14:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/hardware/thin-client43534#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorThu, 14 Feb 2008 10:03:09 GMT
The review above says that Quest Coefficient supports SQL Server 2005. It does NOT support SQL Server 2005. I don’t see how it could be rated as a "gold winner" when it doesn’t support the most recent SQL Server version (which had been available for almost a year before this article was written).]]>KevinThu, 14 Feb 2008 10:03:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/exchange-server/exchange-2007-licensing97537#commentsAnchorTue, 27 Nov 2007 05:08:55 GMT
I’m expecting to see a webcast. I can’t even see a link to go to the webcast.]]>SteveTue, 27 Nov 2007 05:08:55 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/exchange-server/exchange-2007-licensing97537#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/registry2/registry-management-tool47338#commentsAnchorMon, 26 Nov 2007 13:33:00 GMT
Unfortunately this article is no longer useful as DesktopStandard’s PolicyMaker Registry Extension does not appear to be available since Microsoft took over DesktopStandard.]]>CraigMon, 26 Nov 2007 13:33:00 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/registry2/registry-management-tool47338#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/software-deployment-tool43641#commentsAnchorWed, 03 Oct 2007 03:44:17 GMT
If you prefer Group Policy based software deployment I would recommed Specops Deploy from Special Operations Software.]]>RobertWed, 03 Oct 2007 03:44:17 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/software-deployment-tool43641#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/letters-to-the-editor96635#commentsAnchorThu, 27 Sep 2007 02:11:55 GMT
To "A SharePoint Survival Guide for SQL Server Admins": It it essential after attaching a sharepoint database to change the dbo to the account which has created it in the first time, normally the Sharepoint administrator account. SQL Server 2005 don’t remember this in the detaching process. So you have to register the Owner of the database(s) before detaching it and choose the true owner at the attach process. You can alse execute the procedure sp_changedbowner if the database is already attached. I hope this will help you. Bernhard Stief]]>BernhardThu, 27 Sep 2007 02:11:55 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server/letters-to-the-editor96635#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/commentary/letters-windowsitpro-com96677#commentsAnchorTue, 25 Sep 2007 17:04:30 GMT
I think you’ve hit on one or our biggest challenges. We want to reach IT professionals at any stage of their career. In every issue of Windows IT Pro, we try to cover a range of skill levels, from novice to advanced. We also try to cover a broad range of topics from networking to Exchange to security, etc. We welcome reader feedback and suggestions for what you’d like to see in our magazine. Drop me a line and let me know how we can better serve you. If you have suggestions for specific topics you’d like to see, I’d like to hear them. Amy Eisenberg, Executive Editor Windows IT Pro amy@windowsitpro.com]]>AmyTue, 25 Sep 2007 17:04:30 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/commentary/letters-windowsitpro-com96677#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/commentary/letters-windowsitpro-com96677#commentsAnchorThu, 20 Sep 2007 01:20:25 GMT
Brien Posey wrote: Required Reading articles are intended to provide basic-level information for readers who don’t have the depth of experience that you obviously possess. I have to say that I must agree Thor’s message. If you are required to write only basic level articles, why don’t you change the name to WindowsITBasic.]]>PenkaThu, 20 Sep 2007 01:20:25 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/commentary/letters-windowsitpro-com96677#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-4-linux-is-not-vulnerable-to-attacks-#commentsAnchorMon, 23 Jul 2007 20:21:43 GMT
Bull ****]]>rayMon, 23 Jul 2007 20:21:43 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-4-linux-is-not-vulnerable-to-attacks-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-windowsitpro-com95789#commentsAnchorMon, 16 Jul 2007 09:57:56 GMT
Here is the original blog post I wrote about Ben from which my letter is taken: http://frenchfamily.org/hunter/?cat=42 -Hunter]]>HunterMon, 16 Jul 2007 09:57:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-windowsitpro-com95789#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorSun, 01 Jul 2007 17:48:36 GMT
I moved into my house in Palm Desert 7 years ago, and ran Ethernet to every room including my Entertainment Center. It took about 5 years before a good Electronic Component used the connection in the Entertainment Center. This was a Buffalo DVD Multimedia Player, years ahead of AppleTV, and it streams DVD quality video with no problem. Now all we need is some good non-proprietary video to stream. AppleTV gets all the Press, but it can’t hold a candle to the Buffalo Player, playing proprietary software will never cut it.]]>Alex Chavarin Sun, 01 Jul 2007 17:48:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-3-because-linux-source-code-can-be-viewed-and-modified-by-it-administrators-it-is-more-reliable-over-time-than-windows-#commentsAnchorSat, 23 Jun 2007 15:34:40 GMT
Do I smell even a taint of Microsoft sponsorship or at least bias in these Linux Myths articles? Why not make these comparisons: 1) Which product has 3rd party file system support, allowing major advances in performance and stability? 2) Which product actually "is" multi-user right out of the box? 3) Which product has been able, from day one, to prevent privileged code execution? 4) Which product does not need elevated user credentials in order to run any end-user application? 5) And as for speed...let me ask, how could a product with a one-gigabyte plus in-memory code base possibly be faster than one with under a couple of hundred killobytes? What kind of tea are you guys drinking anyway? This article is a myth.]]>DavidSat, 23 Jun 2007 15:34:40 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-3-because-linux-source-code-can-be-viewed-and-modified-by-it-administrators-it-is-more-reliable-over-time-than-windows-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/setting-different-password-policies-for-different-groups#commentsAnchorWed, 06 Jun 2007 15:44:15 GMT
Alternatively, you could purchase a third-party application, for example, Special Operations Password Policy and assign different password policies without requiring a separate domain.]]>ANTHONYWed, 06 Jun 2007 15:44:15 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/passwords/setting-different-password-policies-for-different-groups#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorThu, 17 May 2007 11:18:44 GMT
I want a STB that allows me to subscribe to the channels I watch and doesn’t make me pay for the stations in languages I don’t speak.]]>JeffThu, 17 May 2007 11:18:44 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorWed, 16 May 2007 14:08:36 GMT
http://ati.amd.com/products/tvwonderdigital/index.html AMD/ATI’s STB]]>COLLINWed, 16 May 2007 14:08:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorWed, 16 May 2007 12:00:23 GMT
You want music, photos, etc on your TV / living room? Look @ XBMC it does all that and more. http://www.xboxmediacenter.com/]]>ShaneWed, 16 May 2007 12:00:23 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorWed, 16 May 2007 09:53:46 GMT
How about an STB that interfaces with Media Center! Only DirectTV has made any announcements but it has been in beta forever...]]>King Buzzo Wed, 16 May 2007 09:53:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorWed, 16 May 2007 09:42:41 GMT
As one who is a couch potato not through choice, I don’t know how I would survive without my PC and the internet. it is my TV my comm’s center (email, messenger and Skype), my libary, reference tool - and so much more. I can still do a bit of programming on a good day. Pity it can’t make the coffee. I have long been of the opinion that the internet would slowly take over the job of providing household entertainment and communication, I am still positive that it will. It is revolutonising the way people study and will continue to play a growing role in this area. I would like to see more wireless interconnection between the PC and the rest of the home, both for entertainment and control.]]>MikeWed, 16 May 2007 09:42:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorTue, 15 May 2007 12:20:59 GMT
Terrible! Finding new ways to enable people’s sedentary lifestyles. Get off the couch and go DO something. No wonder there’s an obesity problem in the US.]]>BenTue, 15 May 2007 12:20:59 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/home-office/the-future-of-media-in-the-networked-home#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/software-deployment-tool43641#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Apr 2007 10:39:19 GMT
InstallSolutions.net has a great tool for software deployment called Remote Software Installation Utility. It works great as side product for SMS to get those problem machines that SMS and other tools cannot get. Check it out http://www.InstallSolutions.net]]>MichaelTue, 03 Apr 2007 10:39:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/software-deployment-tool43641#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/software-deployment-tool#commentsAnchorTue, 03 Apr 2007 10:34:57 GMT
InstallSolutions.net has a great tool for software deployment called Remote Software Installation Utility. It works great for the "unmanaged" or problem systems that SMS and other big services cannot get to. Check it out http://www.InstallSolutions.net]]>MichaelTue, 03 Apr 2007 10:34:57 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/auditing/software-deployment-tool#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server-2005/letters-to-the-editor95079#commentsAnchorWed, 14 Mar 2007 05:50:19 GMT
Surrogate vs. Natural Primary Keys I don’t want to start a yes/no comment session on this article, so I’ll safely remain in the middle with the opinion, ’it depends on your situation’. We should consider this a strange answer for an exact science of ones and zeros. I want to bring to your attention a risk related solely to using a natural primary key. Scenario 1 The business operations changes and your natural primary key stops being a primary key. If you’re trusting that a field will be a primary key forever you’re probably looking towards a massive application change. With surrogate PKs chances are you will not have to change anything. Scenario 2 Assume you’re using product codes as primary keys. Your company decides to rename the product codes to standardize worldwide. If you’re trusting on the product code as a primary key you will have to change every table containing that product code. You will also run in relational trouble since PK-FK relations will not allow you to just change one table at a time. With surrogate PKs you have to change only the main product table. (disclaimer: Not considering historical data and the need to keep old product codes) My conclusion In this ever changing world, you’re never sure that a field will remain a primary key for ever. For this reason, by default, I use surrogate identity fields. If you really want to play safe you should even use guid fields as a surrogate PK to be prepared for decentralization scenarios.]]>NicoWed, 14 Mar 2007 05:50:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/sql-server-2005/letters-to-the-editor95079#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-2-the-vast-majority-of-unix-migrations-go-to-linux-#commentsAnchorWed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:13 GMT
I don’t believe this sh**t]]>apit.my Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:10:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/interoperability/myth-2-the-vast-majority-of-unix-migrations-go-to-linux-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/web-based-training40111#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Feb 2007 05:17:07 GMT
i AM INTERESTED TO GET PRACTICAL KNOWLEDGE OF DIFFERENT LINUX SERVERS]]>vivekThu, 22 Feb 2007 05:17:07 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/web-based-training40111#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorTue, 30 Jan 2007 21:44:36 GMT
By no means will I try to imply that you are exaggerating or blatantly making that account up. But I will say that has to be the most non-typical opinion of the company I have ever seen. Heck, they invented the concept. Copycats in the industry sound like what you describe - test prep regurgitating sessions. They even warned me about such companies when I signed up. I think that they are a Microsoft Partner. I’ve since found that other copycat companies often risk litigation fromMS for their practices. I know they are classier than what you describe because I went to their DC class, my friend Paul Marquardt went to their Florida class, my buddy Tom Menasco went out west somewhere (I can’t remember where right now) - the list goes on and on. The formula is simple, 14 days straight dawn to dusk, lecture, labs, group study, total emersion. Is it INTENSE. But you come out with an exceptional knowledge enhancement (even if like me you already knew the products and concepts for the most part) and 95% of the time you also come out with an MCSE. These guys don’t push illegal test preps, they discourage it in fact. Someone in class brought up test king and the instructor (Kelly Morrison - awesome) was quick to remind us that these types of test prep are often filled with errors and under high risk of being sued. Some have even speculated that you could have your MCSE revoked if MS ever subpoenaed their records. But that’s another story. In my case the hotel was nice, but not distractingly so. The classroom was at the hotel, you took your tests at the hotel, they brought the food in, there were plenty of snacks and drinks all the time. They made it as easy as pie to focus on nothing but getting your MCSE in 14 days and leaving with the concepts you needed. No "paper MCSE’s" ever walked out of mine or any of my friend’s classes or we would stop recommending them. Yes, they are on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You’ll be proud of your MCSE, I sure am Chris]]>ssTue, 30 Jan 2007 21:44:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-windowsitpro-com94462#commentsAnchorFri, 26 Jan 2007 19:06:21 GMT
Hi,just a comment for Charles Claunch should you read this - I’ve had problems with intel server boards not showing the full 4GB of RAM under Server 2003. Intel said this was due to device drivers using some up (?!). Anyway, if you boot machine with the /PAE flag in boot.ini you should then see the full 4GB in OS (works for me on a number of servers), something about it letting the drivers map above 4GB mark, but I don’t have a clue how that works. Regards, Bryce Stenberg.]]>BryceFri, 26 Jan 2007 19:06:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-windowsitpro-com94462#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/virtualization/letters-to-the-editor94554#commentsAnchorThu, 25 Jan 2007 09:49:58 GMT
Great idea. We’ll do it!]]>DianaThu, 25 Jan 2007 09:49:58 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/virtualization/letters-to-the-editor94554#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/virtualization/letters-to-the-editor94554#commentsAnchorThu, 25 Jan 2007 06:05:19 GMT
Not that I’m lazy, but it would be a great feature to include references to past articles as hyperlinks within the editorial letters. Your readers would be more apt to jump to the articles to review what they missed the first time around.]]>PaulThu, 25 Jan 2007 06:05:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/virtualization/letters-to-the-editor94554#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorSat, 16 Dec 2006 20:31:41 GMT
Some of you guys should lighten up.]]>mrjit Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:31:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorWed, 22 Nov 2006 09:33:07 GMT
Totally useless and try changing your voice tone when acting two different roles!]]>nicolasWed, 22 Nov 2006 09:33:07 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorWed, 22 Nov 2006 01:45:11 GMT
Utterly a waste for all sides involved. All the debates were getting old too until recently when Ballmer made his strange statement about Linux infringement on intellectual property. But Microsoft may have more than just Ballmer as a problem. Vista is too little too late, Zune is a dud, and their deal with Universal may be a colossal miscalculation. As a former Windows/Microsoft follower, I am really disappointed in where they seem to be headed.]]>R2Wed, 22 Nov 2006 01:45:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorThu, 09 Nov 2006 21:30:46 GMT
boring and completely useless for either side...]]>R2Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:30:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-to-the-editor93439#commentsAnchorSat, 28 Oct 2006 14:23:54 GMT
fine]]>KarthikeyanSat, 28 Oct 2006 14:23:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/letters-to-the-editor93439#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture2/readers-choice-shaping-the-it-industry#commentsAnchorThu, 26 Oct 2006 06:50:21 GMT
I Have to agree with LARay. I have a subscription and never received anything about a survey. I just don’t see how HP could have swept the board like that with company’s like Sun and Dell and IBM out there.]]>JustinThu, 26 Oct 2006 06:50:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture2/readers-choice-shaping-the-it-industry#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorSat, 21 Oct 2006 01:32:32 GMT
that was awesome. I like the part when clipit says to the penguin that he’s not gui enough. that was a riot.]]>ElijahSat, 21 Oct 2006 01:32:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/windows-and-linux-why-can-t-we-all-get-along-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorSat, 07 Oct 2006 05:45:53 GMT
In August 2004, I attended an MCSE boot camp at Intense Schools. They’ve since been purchased by Vigilar. Some of the same people are there. This is absolutely the worst IT company I’ve ever dealt with, regardless of the company catagory. HORRIBLE. The arrangements of the class where a lie - we were supposed to be in the Residence Inn, instead they never made reservations, so we ended up in a horrible dump hotel with tiny rooms. It never got any better, even though they eventually did get into the R.I. (and made it sound like they did us a favor). The meat of it, the instruction, was dismal. The training computers were so old and slow, it truly wasn’t worth the bother. The instructor was far below par, and far worse than any other I’ve ever had, and this course was not cheap. He was unresponsive to questions, seldom stayed late to help students, frequently belittled students who asked "dumb" questions, yet let others drivvle on and on about their mostly irrelevant scenarios. He just didn’t lead the class very well either. I did manage to pass - largely due to the highly illegal brain dump practice exams they wrote for use to use. Running on a server via ASP pages, you couldn’t take a copy with you (of course!), but the "practice tests" VERY closely emulated the actual exam questions - a no no in this industry. I mean, company names, scenarios, questions and answers. When I took the exams, I literally new the answer because I had seen the question before. It really was that much of an exam rip. Heck, I walked out an MCSE, and I had NEVER INSTALLED AD, Never created/implemented a group policy (and didn’t know how). I wouldn’t have been able to tell you the basic tool to use for most of that stuff. Basically, I was disfunctional as an actual MCSE, I just regurgitated test answers. Total paper MCSE. Something I abhor in the industry.]]>JoeSat, 07 Oct 2006 05:45:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/services/training-and-certification#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture2/readers-choice-shaping-the-it-industry#commentsAnchorWed, 06 Sep 2006 07:18:26 GMT
Why all HP products? IBM Baldecenter has 46% of the market and is not a rip and replace technology as HP has desingned their blade solution. IBM offers more choice for IO with BladeCenetr than HP. There are other issues with this so called readers choice award. I am a "reader", I did not get a survey. Who is really doing the voting here?]]>LanceWed, 06 Sep 2006 07:18:26 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture2/readers-choice-shaping-the-it-industry#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/bypass-surfcontrol-url-blocking#commentsAnchorFri, 01 Sep 2006 00:59:51 GMT
Everybody, it’s not SurfControl stopping you from going to web sites. It is because your organization chooses to block you from going to these sites based on their Acceptable Internet Usage Policy. If for some reason you are being blocked you need to let the administrator at your organization know that you need access. The administrator can easily add that website to an allow rule for each user, group of users or the whole organization by simply dragging the URL and dropping it into the rule. Simple. So, I would suggest that if you are going to complain about being blocked that you know what your organizations policy is on internet usage, Playing games and shopping are fun, but cost billions of dollars a year in lost productivity, internet security threats such as Spyware, Malware, phishing, hacking, you name it! In addition, confidential data leakage, legal liabilities, non-compliance. The internet is not a toy for a business, it is a tool that helps generate revenue and keep the business going. If you do not own your own business then imagine that you do, what if your employees were playing on the internet all day and you were paying them $10.00 an hour, plus insurance, vacation, etc. So really you are spending about $20.00 per hour and that is conservative. If a single user spends 1 hour a day for recreational surfing for a month that will cost your business $600.00 per month in lost productivity, Now imagine that you have 50 employees that spend an hour for recreational surfing, that will cost your business about $30,000 a month in lost productivity, The more the users the more the loss, the more the internet threats, liabilities, opportunities for data leakage, etc. So think about it as a business owner before you complain about being blocked.]]>JohnFri, 01 Sep 2006 00:59:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/bypass-surfcontrol-url-blocking#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorWed, 26 Jul 2006 11:39:53 GMT
Tableau’s web address is wrong (extra space in the middle)]]>MerrillWed, 26 Jul 2006 11:39:53 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/data-modeling/rock-stars#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/third-party-authentication-device#commentsAnchorMon, 17 Jul 2006 07:31:42 GMT
Too short no information]]>RobertMon, 17 Jul 2006 07:31:42 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/third-party-authentication-device#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/do-you-defrag-regularly-#commentsAnchorSat, 01 Jul 2006 04:23:45 GMT
Since this article was ritten, a new tool is available (free) to measure your status concerning fragmentation and defrag scheduling. It is available at www.disklace.com more than 60’000 users already downloaded it from Google, but it is available as a stand alone Windows tool.]]>KobyB Sat, 01 Jul 2006 04:23:45 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/do-you-defrag-regularly-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/file-compression-tool43744#commentsAnchorMon, 24 Apr 2006 19:43:13 GMT
nice good to read]]>nandMon, 24 Apr 2006 19:43:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/file-compression-tool43744#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/file-management/defragmentation-utility#commentsAnchorFri, 21 Apr 2006 10:21:39 GMT
Great product, reliable, and cost effective. This company is very customer friendly.]]>woodster121302 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:21:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/file-management/defragmentation-utility#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/file-management/defragmentation-utility47358#commentsAnchorMon, 17 Apr 2006 09:56:42 GMT
PerfectDisk is the best. I have tested several defragmentation managers, both subscription and outright purchase; PD is tops. They should bundle their whole group for that price however.]]>sailsmanroth Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:56:42 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/file-management/defragmentation-utility47358#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/hold-on-to-your-blackberries-#commentsAnchorMon, 20 Feb 2006 13:00:48 GMT
I played with them all (i.e. PPC, Treo, Motorola Messenger, etc.); NONE of them can compete with RIM’s offering. It seems my BB is more important than my wallet at times! Hey--even PalmOne is licensing the BB OS!!! ....I am Goverment, so hopefully we’ll survive this a little easier.]]>LEEMon, 20 Feb 2006 13:00:48 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/hold-on-to-your-blackberries-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/server-systems/blade-server#commentsAnchorThu, 16 Feb 2006 06:00:24 GMT
You guys are nuts! We evaluated the Dell "Blades" and within a week of running, 80% of them burned up! I mean smoke burning! these things were the cheesiest, most flimsy, pieces of crap that tried to pass for a server we had ever seen! They are not even in the same class as the HP or IBM blades...We ended up going HP because of the better management and reliability...]]>TManning Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:00:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/server-systems/blade-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/antivirus-server-side#commentsAnchorThu, 26 Jan 2006 08:00:11 GMT
Symantec Antivirus is NOT what it used to be. Their current 10.x suite is a huge, steamy pile of ****.]]>RussellThu, 26 Jan 2006 08:00:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/encryption2/antivirus-server-side#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/bypass-surfcontrol-url-blocking#commentsAnchorThu, 26 Jan 2006 02:38:40 GMT
My school computer is that strict that when i go on google it wont even let me clik on images without surf control going on 1. how can i access some other websites other than *******educational one’s.]]>Daniel_Gibson Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:38:40 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/bypass-surfcontrol-url-blocking#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/hold-on-to-your-blackberries-#commentsAnchorWed, 25 Jan 2006 09:10:18 GMT
Blackberry OS crashes so much its as if they are already shut down!]]>AnthonyWed, 25 Jan 2006 09:10:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/hold-on-to-your-blackberries-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/avidian-uses-outlook-as-its-platform-#commentsAnchorMon, 02 Jan 2006 09:44:45 GMT
It promises a lot both from the great marketing Skills that Avidian Makers of Profit seem to have. I have spent the last four days compiling a thorough review of this product for our own sales needs. The notion that you do not need technical support to install this product is farcical. The supplied manual is minimilist with no troublshooting section. There is no trouble shooting section ( other than one geared for the most basic of problems ) on the website. The hours of support ( or sales for that matter on their website are not adhered to either. I spent hours and hours trying to get the programme to do something fundamental..recognise my contacts folder and it wouldnt do it. It seemed to keep losing information , which then reappeared randomly. All in all, i dont recomend this product, which is a shame really , as it has lots of promise and seems to nearly be there. I do not like to post a negative review and have considered doing so carefully. I would give it a review score of 3/5. I will update this review when i can , if Technical support decide to get back to me.]]>freefallu Mon, 02 Jan 2006 09:44:45 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/news2/avidian-uses-outlook-as-its-platform-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/network-load-balancing-nlb/network-layout-and-design-tool47277#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Dec 2005 01:35:14 GMT
There is no link here to download the tool what is the use of such an article where we cannot find out things]]>areefThu, 22 Dec 2005 01:35:14 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/network-load-balancing-nlb/network-layout-and-design-tool47277#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/email/happy-holidays-or-not-#commentsAnchorWed, 21 Dec 2005 10:20:33 GMT
I am a subscriber, I tried to log on and I cannot read the article.]]>KEVINWed, 21 Dec 2005 10:20:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/email/happy-holidays-or-not-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/quota-management-software47324#commentsAnchorMon, 19 Dec 2005 08:32:18 GMT
This web site has gone downhill quite a bit since the begining. Why this lame "review" would be restricted is beyond me.]]>WALTMon, 19 Dec 2005 08:32:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/quota-management-software47324#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/administration-tools2/router47271#commentsAnchorThu, 17 Nov 2005 00:23:12 GMT
good]]>alpeshppandya Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:23:12 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/administration-tools2/router47271#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/administration-tools2/router47271#commentsAnchorThu, 17 Nov 2005 00:22:28 GMT
good]]>alpeshppandya Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:22:28 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/administration-tools2/router47271#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/load-balancer#commentsAnchorTue, 15 Nov 2005 11:13:49 GMT
that’s not an article - it’s a definition!]]>BLAINETue, 15 Nov 2005 11:13:49 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/load-balancer#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/network-load-balancing-nlb/network-layout-and-design-tool47277#commentsAnchorMon, 14 Nov 2005 01:06:44 GMT
its more usefull for me]]>alpeshppandya Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:06:44 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/network-load-balancing-nlb/network-layout-and-design-tool47277#commentsAnchor