http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5777304/rsscomment/5777304en-USSun, 27 May 2012 07:17:07 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 07:17:07 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/pop3-easy-access-to-microsoft-exchange-server#commentsAnchorWed, 30 Jan 2008 11:20:54 GMT
Computerhealth, I’m sorry to hear that you are having trouble logging on to our Web site. I have passed this on to the Windows IT Pro customer service department to see if they can fix the problem. Megan Bearly Assistant Editor, SQL Server Magazine and Windows IT Pro magazinembearly@windowsitpro.com]]>meganbearly Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:20:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/pop3-easy-access-to-microsoft-exchange-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/pop3-easy-access-to-microsoft-exchange-server#commentsAnchorWed, 30 Jan 2008 01:13:30 GMT
Trouble logging in!]]>MikeWed, 30 Jan 2008 01:13:30 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/pop3-easy-access-to-microsoft-exchange-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-1#commentsAnchorTue, 29 Jan 2008 16:14:19 GMT
Good]]>AndrewTue, 29 Jan 2008 16:14:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/configuring-and-administering-dns#commentsAnchorTue, 20 Apr 2004 07:20:39 GMT
Just Learning about DNS for WIN NT. Found your info direct and useful]]>Sheldon Quinton Tue, 20 Apr 2004 07:20:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/configuring-and-administering-dns#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/high-availability-system-architecture#commentsAnchorTue, 13 Aug 2002 14:45:33 GMT
Page 24 of the print article states that RAID 5 technology introduces additional fault tolerance by allocating portions of each disk in the array to parity data. No, RAID 5 does not provides additional fault tolerance over mirroring. It is just another way of providing fault tolerance in which we have a more efficient fault tolerance (because mirroring means 50 % efficiency where as teh efficiency of RAID 5 exceeds 66%). It is efficient but it does not introduce any more fault tolerance.]]>Murat Yildirimoglu Tue, 13 Aug 2002 14:45:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/high-availability-system-architecture#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorMon, 20 May 2002 21:36:22 GMT
The article is great , i found it very useful. What I would like to know is if need to use a customized NetMeeting Client (i.e I have changed UI etc. using the NetMeeting SDK) in the data-conferencing pane of Exchange 2000 Conferencing CLient what are the settings that I need to make. Thanks in advance]]>kavithaMon, 20 May 2002 21:36:22 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-2#commentsAnchorTue, 08 Jan 2002 10:56:13 GMT
Does anyone know of a query that reports if a particular drive is mapped throughout a organization’s computer systems? Any information would be appreciated.]]>Irvin Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:56:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorWed, 21 Nov 2001 09:50:52 GMT
The key that is added should be "ExchangeConferencing", i.e. no space between the words exchange and conferencing, then all is fine and possibly even dandy - until you want to find a broadband medium to use exchange conferencing successfully over the internet, any chance of getting it to work across NAT ? Can’t even get it to work on ADSL with no NAT!]]>Paul Crozer Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:50:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-2#commentsAnchorMon, 30 Jul 2001 15:46:21 GMT
I want to find out soultion for finding Proxy settings from SMS Database. It should come in queries, Can you help me out? Thanks and Regards, ]]>Paparao Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:46:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/sms-inventory-your-desktop-systems-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorFri, 11 May 2001 15:57:54 GMT
I have the same problem as the guy above, I am running evaluation versions of Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server, on Windows 2000 Advanced Server Evaluation, with Exchange Conferencing Server 2000. I’ve made the registry change you suggest but I still only have Netmeeting and NetShow options when I request anew meeting. Please help!!]]>Paul Crozer Fri, 11 May 2001 15:57:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Sep 2000 12:16:41 GMT
I am having the same type of problem that the other guy said he was having when setting up the Conferencing Server. Can you provide more information on getting the clients to talk with the Conferencing Server. Thanks in advance for your help.]]>Ron Moore Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:16:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorMon, 25 Sep 2000 12:17:23 GMT
Hi Thanks for this aricle and it’s great. I had problem following the steps specially when you want to add the Exchange Conferencing to the registry for outlook 2000 client. I add it as you mentioned in this document, but did not see it from my calendar. I saw only the NetMeeting and NetShow and I don’t know if I need to do something on exchange server as well. Do you know how I can enable this part. or is there any documents about how to set up the Exchange Conferencing? Thanks for your help]]>Michael Jawarish Mon, 25 Sep 2000 12:17:23 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/exchange-2000-s-conferencing-service#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/collaboration-data-objects-cdo/using-microsoft-s-internet-news-server#commentsAnchorFri, 05 May 2000 14:02:17 GMT
Perhaps I read this too fast, but it seems to me that there should be some integration with IIS nntp services.]]>JB Fields Fri, 05 May 2000 14:02:17 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/collaboration-data-objects-cdo/using-microsoft-s-internet-news-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/integrating-and-administering-dns#commentsAnchorThu, 12 Aug 1999 13:27:18 GMT
I enjoyed the September article, “Integrating and Administering DNS,” by Spyros Sakellariadis. Microsoft’s GUI implementation looks attractive. My only (but major!) concern is whether this solution is robust enough for an environment that is extremely dependent on its Domain Name System (DNS) servers. I’ve got faculty doing collaborative research with colleagues on the Internet, and a fairly complex asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network on campus with more than 20 routed LANE segments. Because many of our labs are heavily into Win95, the close coupling of DNS and Windows Internet Name Service (WINS) looks especially appealing, but I need some level of assurance that both NT 4.0 and this DNS applet can stand the rigors of 24 X 7 usage. Do you have experience with or know of anyone at a sizable installation who is using the NT and DNS combo in production mode? I’d really appreciate any input.
—Jeff Leving, Network Analyst,

Microsoft is using it . The Web servers at http://www.microsoft.com alone are getting 14 million hits per day. All those inquiries—at least the ones shown when you do an NSLOOKUP on microsoft.com—are hitting the NT4.0 DNS for resolution. Several ISPs are beginning to use it.
--Spyros Sakellariadis]]>Jeff Leving Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:27:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/integrating-and-administering-dns#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/protocols/using-microsoft-email-clients-with-exchange-server#commentsAnchorWed, 11 Aug 1999 13:49:09 GMT
In response to a September letter from a reader about how Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) works, Spyros Sakellariadis said, “What I meant is that the Outlook Express client IMAP service automatically deletes mail from the server, ...” This statement is wrong. I’ve been using the Outlook Express IMAP client for about 18 months, and the only way to get it to delete messages from the server is to mark the message as deleted and purge the mail. The standard behavior is to keep all messages on the server and not get rid of even deleted messages unless specifically told to do so.
--Nik Simpson

In the section about deleted messages and the IMAP protocol in “Using Microsoft Email Clients with Exchange Server” (July), I was ambiguous about Exchange Server and wrong about Outlook Express (OE). After receiving a plethora of letters, I checked Exchange Server support and published the September letter in which I clarified the Exchange Server treatment and apologized for any misinformation. Unfortunately, I held my position on OE because I did not have the application with me, and I was sure my memory was correct. As Nik pointed out almost immediately, OE permits storing read and deleted messages on the Exchange Server system. When you read a message in OE, it flags the message in the Information Store (IS) as “seen.” When you delete a message in OE, it flags the message as “marked for deletion.” The message remains on the server, and a Messaging API (MAPI) client such as Outlook can still see and read the message. The only way to remove a message from the server using IMAP is to select Purge Deleted Messages from the Edit menu in OE and issue the Expunge command. This action permanently removes any message marked as deleted from the IS.
Mea culpa. I apologize for my laziness, and thank y’all for keeping me honest! Now I know how Bill Clinton feels with each successive iteration of Ken Starr’s probe.
--Spyros Sakellariadis]]>Nik Simpson Wed, 11 Aug 1999 13:49:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/protocols/using-microsoft-email-clients-with-exchange-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/using-exchange-server-with-smtp-and-pop3#commentsAnchorWed, 11 Aug 1999 11:39:39 GMT
I’m a great fan of Windows NT Magazine, which I find full of interesting and relevant information. Spyros Sakellariadis’ June article, “Using Exchange Server with SMTP and POP3,” is a good example of the quality of information the magazine provides. I particularly like the references to other relevant articles, which I can read to complete the picture. I recently discovered the archive of articles on your Web site. This resource is gold! Past articles are available through a variety of sort modes with links to relevant articles. I can’t express my appreciation adequately. Your archive is now the starting point for all my research.
--Richard J. Jennette]]>Richard J. Jennette Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:39:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/using-exchange-server-with-smtp-and-pop3#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/protocols/using-microsoft-email-clients-with-exchange-server#commentsAnchorWed, 11 Aug 1999 10:24:46 GMT
In “Using Microsoft Email Clients with Exchange Server” (July), the description of Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) surprised me. My company’s experience and research has shown that one of the greatest benefits of the IMAP 4.1 protocol is the ability to remotely access and manage a message store on the server without needing to download a message except to read it. You can leave the original message on the server in the user-defined folder that contains the message. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding something about IMAP.
--Eric Koester

You are absolutely correct that IMAP 4 is a very rich protocol that supports storing read messages on the mail server. I caused some confusion in the July article by stating that “IMAP doesn’t let you keep copies of mail on the server, and it downloads your messages automatically to your mailbox when you double-click the message.” What I meant is that the Outlook Express client IMAP service automatically deletes mail from the server, compared with the Outlook Express Post Office Protocol (POP) 3 delivery service, which you can configure to leave a copy of messages on the server. Exchange Server 5.5 certainly supports leaving read mail on the server. Any IMAP client that you can configure to do so will work correctly with Exchange Server 5.5.
--Spyros Sakellariadis]]>Eric Koester Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:24:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/protocols/using-microsoft-email-clients-with-exchange-server#commentsAnchor