<![CDATA[Article Comments for Pierre Bijaoui]]>http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5448968/rsscomment/5448968en-USSun, 27 May 2012 06:17:51 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 06:17:51 GMTExchange 2000 and ADhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/exchange-2000-server/exchange-2000-and-ad#commentsAnchorMon, 05 Nov 2001 13:49:19 GMT
What is the difference between Exchange 2000 Server and Exchange 2000 Enterprise Server? Thanks! ]]>
Jack Bowden Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:49:19 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/exchange-2000-server/exchange-2000-and-ad#commentsAnchor
Exchange 2000 Performance Planninghttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/performance/exchange-2000-performance-planning#commentsAnchorThu, 30 Mar 2000 18:37:46 GMT
Tony Redmond/Pierre Bijaoui article states "For example, don’t expect a 50GB disk to process more than 70 I/O requests per second. Over time, disks might spin faster, get denser, and hold more data, but they can still serve I/O at only a set rate, and that rate isn’t increasing." Not sure I understand the principle, seems that if disks get faster it would in fact increase IOs (I can see where denser and larger wouldn’t necessarily)? What am I missing? I suppose it’s back to Disks 101 for me, huh? ]]>
Geoffrey Thomas Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:37:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/performance/exchange-2000-performance-planning#commentsAnchor