http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5082386/rsscomment/5082386en-USSun, 27 May 2012 06:02:31 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 06:02:31 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visualstudiolightswitch/product-review-visual-studio-lightswitch-141711#commentsAnchorTue, 06 Mar 2012 09:29:39 GMT
Geat Article William. I've been following the LightSwitch product since well before the initial beta release. As form citizen developer, I was immediately attracted to the prospect of a tool that could serve exactly what I needed to do. For what it's worth, I maintain a blog at www.PaulSPatterson.com where readers will find a couple of years worth of LightSwitch content. With the latest Microsoft Visual Studio 2011 Beta, A new version of LightSwitch will become available as a first-class citizen to the Visual Studio project types. By the way, a clarification on the paragraph reading, "By default, LightSwitch uses the Active Directory (AD) infrastructure..." By default, LightSwitch does not implement any kind of security infrastructure. Out of the box, a new LightSwitch project is not configured to enable any authentication. The options to use Windows or Forms Authentication for security is available as an option when configuring a LightSwitch project via the project properties window. I agree with the your comments on the trepidation some developers will have. I have seen it first hand, and considering the target market for LightSwitch; the latent or "citizen" developer, most code level developers would rather keep their hands within the code of solution - a control thing I suppose. Again, I encourage readers to take a look at the documentation, download the trial version, and read up on what the community has to say. I believe in what LightSwitch has to offer, and can see a mass market for it. Time will tell of course. Cheers, Paul Patterson www.PaulSPatterson.com]]>Paul PattersonTue, 06 Mar 2012 09:29:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visualstudiolightswitch/product-review-visual-studio-lightswitch-141711#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visualstudiolightswitch/product-review-visual-studio-lightswitch-141711#commentsAnchorTue, 06 Mar 2012 09:29:09 GMT
Geat Article William. I've been following the LightSwitch product since well before the initial beta release. As form citizen developer, I was immediately attracted to the prospect of a tool that could serve exactly what I needed to do. For what it's worth, I maintain a blog at www.PaulSPatterson.com where readers will find a couple of years worth of LightSwitch content. With the latest Microsoft Visual Studio 2011 Beta, A new version of LightSwitch will become available as a first-class citizen to the Visual Studio project types. By the way, a clarification on the paragraph reading, "By default, LightSwitch uses the Active Directory (AD) infrastructure..." By default, LightSwitch does not implement any kind of security infrastructure. Out of the box, a new LightSwitch project is not configured to enable any authentication. The options to use Windows or Forms Authentication for security is available as an option when configuring a LightSwitch project via the project properties window. I agree with the your comments on the trepidation some developers will have. I have seen it first hand, and considering the target market for LightSwitch; the latent or "citizen" developer, most code level developers would rather keep their hands within the code of solution - a control thing I suppose. Again, I encourage readers to take a look at the documentation, download the trial version, and read up on what the community has to say. I believe in what LightSwitch has to offer, and can see a mass market for it. Time will tell of course. Cheers, Paul Patterson www.PaulSPatterson.com ]]>Paul PattersonTue, 06 Mar 2012 09:29:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visualstudiolightswitch/product-review-visual-studio-lightswitch-141711#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorThu, 19 Nov 2009 18:38:10 GMT
The sentence "The Local System account... doesn’t have access to resources not on the local system,..." is incorrect. The Local System account acts as the computer on the network and this is also true for the Network Service acount. The Local Service account and the Network Service account are subsets of the Local System account as far as permissions are concerned. ############################################################ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684190(VS.85).aspx LocalSystem Account "It has extensive privileges on the local computer, and acts as the computer on the network." "The service presents the computer’s credentials to remote servers." ############################################################ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684272(VS.85).aspx NetworkService Account "A service that runs in the context of the NetworkService account presents the computer’s credentials to remote servers." ############################################################ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684188(VS.85).aspx LocalService Account "It has minimum privileges on the local computer and presents anonymous credentials on the network." ############################################################]]>DimitriosThu, 19 Nov 2009 18:38:10 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorFri, 06 Nov 2009 07:19:22 GMT
Nice article about some basics in security. I was expecting some more advanced since security is the cover of the issue. Take Care!]]>MarcosFri, 06 Nov 2009 07:19:22 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorThu, 05 Nov 2009 15:42:08 GMT
Great article. Appreciate your work in creating it. My lack of knowledge of "The Cloud" will show with my question...but here goes anyway. Will corporate or small business DBAs need to worry about this when the cloud technology is in full swing? Thanks again.]]>SEANThu, 05 Nov 2009 15:42:08 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/securing-your-sql-server-environment#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorFri, 18 Apr 2008 01:07:25 GMT
I believe that is correct. A language will need to leverage the LINQ libraries, to do this for C# and VB required compiler changes - in another language it might not, but my guess is that it would. After all these libraries return types and use new keywords which weren’t available and therefore the compiler needs to be updated to recognize the new syntax elements and convert the new syntax elements and types into the appropriate calls to the database.]]>WILLIAMFri, 18 Apr 2008 01:07:25 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorThu, 17 Apr 2008 20:05:26 GMT
Hi Bill, Thank you very much for your explanation. Now I get better understanding for your answer. So, I can conclude that other languages other than VB and C# that are .NET 3.5 compliant, doeesn’t automatically have LINQ feature if they haven’t leveraged LINQ framework in their compiler. Best Regards, Kasim Wirama]]>KevinThu, 17 Apr 2008 20:05:26 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorThu, 17 Apr 2008 19:43:14 GMT
Hi Kasim, The short answer to your question is that its a bit of both. The core logic used by LINQ is part of the framework. However, each language could and did choose to implement the usage of those capabilities with a unique flavor. Visual Basic and C# include different keywords (for example VB implemented Skip and Take) and in some cases things work slighly different dependent on your implementation. Thus while portions of the LINQ implementation are libraries in the framework, each language has it’s own implementation based on its compiler, with unique language features. In general my experience is that the VB team did a better job of really working to leverage the potential of LINQ, especially when you combine it with XML Literals.]]>WILLIAMThu, 17 Apr 2008 19:43:14 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorThu, 17 Apr 2008 18:36:29 GMT
Hi William, It’s interesting article. I have a question about linq concept. I was told that LINQ is language feature while I believed that LINQ is framework feature. I wonder which one is correct. Would you tell me about background of LINQ (as language/framework feature) please? Thank you. Best Regards, Kasim Wirama]]>KevinThu, 17 Apr 2008 18:36:29 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/c3/linq-to-your-sql-server-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-20052/vsto-and-sharepoint-a-winning-and-possibly-profitable-combination#commentsAnchorSun, 12 Nov 2006 18:37:54 GMT
Worthless. Paragraph after paragraph of filler info. Unfortunately, a lot of SQL Server magazine articles are just like this... 1 to 2 pages of vacuous drivel.]]>LuciusSun, 12 Nov 2006 18:37:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-20052/vsto-and-sharepoint-a-winning-and-possibly-profitable-combination#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorSat, 27 Aug 2005 03:51:27 GMT
I think he is the author himself frustrated that people have not taken his article properly.]]>Anonymous User Sat, 27 Aug 2005 03:51:27 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorThu, 18 Aug 2005 15:14:18 GMT
Well..They did ask for comments..don’t be surprised if you don’t get the results you expected. ]]>Anonymous User Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:14:18 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorThu, 04 Aug 2005 22:03:13 GMT
to the first person that left a comment.... if you don’t find the article useful, write your own you *** maggot!]]>Anonymous User Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:03:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-20052/team-system-and-the-team-foundation-server#commentsAnchorMon, 13 Jun 2005 23:28:48 GMT
First off, I’d really like to thank Microsoft for the Beta versions they sent me and covered the shipping and handling fees on. My only issue is that if I put effort and time dedicated to learning one thing, it frustrates me to see it become obsolete so fast. I do understand that the benefits outweigh the costs in many predicaments. I want Team Suite to stay the standard. I am a novice so I don’t mind starting off this way. Microsoft, thanks again!!! -=/ Jesse Dameron \=-]]>Anonymous User Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:28:48 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-20052/team-system-and-the-team-foundation-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basicnet/refactoring-petitions-and-the-next-big-thing-team-system#commentsAnchorFri, 06 May 2005 14:15:43 GMT
Dork]]>Anonymous User Fri, 06 May 2005 14:15:43 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basicnet/refactoring-petitions-and-the-next-big-thing-team-system#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorMon, 18 Apr 2005 18:33:46 GMT
I’ve seen ads for jobs that want people using VB.Net, specifically. So it’s not out of the question to get a job doing that. I agree though that from what I’ve heard from others at user group meetings, C# is becoming the "lingua Franca" of .Net, though we do get some presenters at our user group meetings who use VB.Net for their demo code. C# isn’t too bad, actually. I say that C# brings together the advantages of C++/Java with the advantages of VB. No more pointers (a la C++), and the code expression is more concise, less wordy. Some people don’t like that, but I do. VB.Net is not a totally worthless language in the .Net world. For example, VB.Net is a VERY practical language to use for writing Office applications, or apps. that use Office components. The reason being that the COM object model in Office was designed with the abilities of VBA in mind. One can write applications for Office in C# but it’s made more difficult by the fact that C# doesn’t support optional or named parameters in function calls, which Office COM functions use a lot. You basically have to get around this limitation by doing some funky coding. VB.Net however continues to support these language features, making it the logical choice for Office development. I wrote an application just recently that needed to import an Excel spreadsheet into a database. The app. is written in C#, but I used VB.Net to write the Excel import component, even though I’ve been using C# for a couple years now. I knew it would be awkward learning VB.Net, since I wasn’t familiar with it, but I figured, "Why make this task hard on myself using C#?" In fact, I’d say that if you’re trying to bring over to .Net any COM components that were designed for use with Office or the old ASP platform, it’s probably better to use VB.Net with them than C# for the same reason, since ASP 6 used VBScript, and you might run into the same issues. I heard one MVP say some months back that it’s actually best to be "bi-lingual" in the .Net world, to enhance one’s marketable skills. Since .Net is a universal API, there’s no point in limiting your opportunities by locking yourself into one language or the other. I’d agree with that. It can even be a little fun. Back in the 1980s I used to program in old-style BASIC a lot on 8-bit computers (think GW-BASIC). Doing work in VB.Net brought back fond memories of those days...sans line numbers. :) ]]>Anonymous User Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:33:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorMon, 18 Apr 2005 18:05:33 GMT
Most of the concern I’ve heard about in the past is that non-techie’s would be orphaned by this move. A lot of the VB 6 user base, from what I’ve understood, are smart people who never took a programming course. They were self-taught, and wrote their own applications in VB, because it’s such an easy language to learn. The overriding complaint I’ve heard is that VB.Net is more complicated than VB 6. There are certain things that VB 6 used to do for programmers behind the scenes that VB.Net doesn’t do, though it can be made to do them, if the programmer puts in the code to make it do it. Since VB coders were heavy users of COM/ActiveX components, some have had trouble converting projects due to the unique way that VB handled those components. One example I can think of are control arrays. .Net doesn’t inherently support them, but there is a way to emulate them. MSDN Online has an article on how to do this (the URL is too long to post here). In any case, it seems to me that if Microsoft wants to bring along the VB 6’ers to VB.Net, or C#, without losing too many of them to some other platform, they’re going to need a lot of support. Make the process easy, not hard. I agree with William Sheldon that at some point technology needs to move on. I probably wouldn’t have stayed with the Microsoft platform if it was just a stick in the mud and chose to just stay with VS 6, without moving the technology forward with .Net. Certainly most of their customers wouldn’t have stood for it either. Several years ago I worked at a place where I developed Unix server software. I kept wanting to move to new technologies so I could use OOP techniques. I tried to convince them to let me use C++ or Java. No dice. They wanted to keep me using C. Eventually I had had enough and I left. What a surprise. Everybody else on the Unix platform was using C++ or Java. I started hearing stories from my old workplace that they were having trouble finding people who would program in C. I suggested they move to something else, like C++. They might find more developers. They did eventually move to something else, which was good for them in the long run. Eventually it just needs to happen. I have wondered though why Microsoft chose to make such a leap with VB.Net in terms of changing the language. It seems to me they could’ve offered some sort of transitional environment, one where you could compile your VB 6 project in it, but generate MSIL, and have access to the .Net API. It’s certainly possible, given that .Net is pretty language-neutral. They gave this ability to C++ developers, for crying out loud, with their IJW (It Just Works) technology. Even with VS.Net 2002, I could write or migrate an MFC app., using the same technologies I’d used before, and give it access to the .Net API. True, I’d need to write some funky code to get .Net controls to work in MFC, but it would be possible without breaking my project upon conversion. ]]>Anonymous User Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:05:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-script-host-wsh/toggling-the-scripting-host#commentsAnchorSat, 09 Apr 2005 01:15:28 GMT
That explains everything; thanks!]]>Anonymous User Sat, 09 Apr 2005 01:15:28 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-script-host-wsh/toggling-the-scripting-host#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorFri, 01 Apr 2005 13:15:37 GMT
See also: The Rest of the Story!]]>Anonymous User Fri, 01 Apr 2005 13:15:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorFri, 01 Apr 2005 13:15:20 GMT
The rest of the story: http://classicvb.org]]>Anonymous User Fri, 01 Apr 2005 13:15:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/is-chicken-little-a-vb-6-0-developer-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/net-framework2/cool-new-features-in-ado-net-2-0#commentsAnchorSat, 26 Mar 2005 09:06:08 GMT
Misleading (wrong) information about the varchar(MAX) option. It is not necessarily stored outside the row-- the engine manages whether it is or isn’t. And it is fundamentally more powerful than the "text" type because one can use all the normal varchar-related operations on it.]]>Anonymous User Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:06:08 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/net-framework2/cool-new-features-in-ado-net-2-0#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet#commentsAnchorMon, 07 Mar 2005 03:27:45 GMT
As above!]]>Anonymous User Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:27:45 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-script-host-wsh/toggling-the-scripting-host#commentsAnchorFri, 25 Feb 2005 00:38:32 GMT
Just what i was looking for thanks!]]>Anonymous User Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:38:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-script-host-wsh/toggling-the-scripting-host#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorTue, 01 Feb 2005 15:59:20 GMT
This article has alitle information and is not explicit ]]>Anonymous User Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:59:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tsql3/sql-server-2005-provides-true-integration-of-xml-data#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorTue, 11 Jan 2005 05:02:37 GMT
Great article]]>Anonymous User Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:02:37 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorFri, 10 Dec 2004 02:26:39 GMT
Nothing usefull except maybe for complete newbie]]>PerduFri, 10 Dec 2004 02:26:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorTue, 23 Nov 2004 20:30:08 GMT
woh nice article]]>Anonymous User Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:30:08 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorTue, 02 Nov 2004 13:01:38 GMT
ESTOY TU HEFI]]>Anonymous User Tue, 02 Nov 2004 13:01:38 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorSat, 30 Oct 2004 06:11:10 GMT
hey guys u have jus copied the material from msdn ....mention it dudes when u dont own it ajit singh]]>Anonymous User Sat, 30 Oct 2004 06:11:10 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet#commentsAnchorThu, 28 Oct 2004 03:54:34 GMT
Thanks for publishing this article! - I spent about 5 hours trying to sort this this out :O( Your articale is well written and clear. Thanks!]]>Anonymous User Thu, 28 Oct 2004 03:54:34 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/systems-administrator/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-net/asp-net-2-0-will-offer-the-best-of-the-present-and-the-past-part-1#commentsAnchorFri, 03 Sep 2004 13:27:17 GMT
I know that comiling on the fly can be done and its not so hard to do. I’ve done it to build a ’script engine’. So I have to take exception with your comment in this article.]]>FrankWFri, 03 Sep 2004 13:27:17 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-net/asp-net-2-0-will-offer-the-best-of-the-present-and-the-past-part-1#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorWed, 18 Aug 2004 07:09:59 GMT
I read an interesting article that relates to having users login to a database... a combination of these techniques would be very cool. http://www.asp101.com/articles/valko/authentication/default.asp]]>JEFFWed, 18 Aug 2004 07:09:59 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorMon, 02 Aug 2004 07:37:54 GMT
Well, you wouldn’t actually need a space. For example, WHERE userid=’sadf’or(1=1)--’ AND password=’password’]]>XXMon, 02 Aug 2004 07:37:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Jul 2004 11:06:33 GMT
Why can’t you just check for a space and %20 ? No username or password that I know of allows them. Of course that would make for a short article ;) Regards, --AC]]>felafelThu, 22 Jul 2004 11:06:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/permissions/preventing-sql-injection-attack#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorThu, 08 Jul 2004 03:42:59 GMT
third class]]>AjeetThu, 08 Jul 2004 03:42:59 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorTue, 06 Jul 2004 20:16:33 GMT
This was exactly what I was looking for. I was having some trouble executing VB scripts for the exact purpose of database creation. Thanks!]]>Marc Villella Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:16:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-net/the-net-database#commentsAnchorFri, 11 Jun 2004 06:12:45 GMT
If we take the data set through the middle tier component, while passing the rows of the dataset to the components, one by one, we need to have a transaction(context util,etc). Is there any way to avoid it?]]>Anusuya Kasiviswanathan Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:12:45 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-studio-net/the-net-database#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorSun, 30 May 2004 23:59:23 GMT
very good]]>rogerSun, 30 May 2004 23:59:23 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorThu, 01 Apr 2004 04:18:36 GMT
Very good - just what I was looking for (to upgrade a database actually).]]>MarkThu, 01 Apr 2004 04:18:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorWed, 24 Mar 2004 23:27:06 GMT
Superb Article.... Fundamental Clarity is provided in this writeup]]>SureshWed, 24 Mar 2004 23:27:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/sql-server-named-instances#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorTue, 09 Mar 2004 17:03:49 GMT
Waste me too much time to try it in Wise Windows installation]]>ROBERTTue, 09 Mar 2004 17:03:49 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorThu, 26 Feb 2004 14:19:33 GMT
Sorry! But I found this article realy poor. Which intention had the author?]]>Ralf Dietrich Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:19:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/managing-secure-database-connections-with-sql-server#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/server-systems/blade-servers#commentsAnchorSun, 07 Dec 2003 17:05:39 GMT
The article goods to the point for basic understanding of blade server and its relevance to scalable and reliable (transparent failover) server architecture. It should provide links to deeper blade and cluster server architecture discussion.]]>Michael J Sun, 07 Dec 2003 17:05:39 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/server-systems/blade-servers#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorMon, 10 Dec 2001 13:59:46 GMT
This proved to be a valuable and timely article for our software development group. We are in the process of trying to find the best method for distributing our applications to International branches. This article helped tremendously and gave us many good ideas for deployment of our database and the objects that go with it.]]>Dustin Franks Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:59:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/vbscript/scripting-a-custom-database-installation#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet9001#commentsAnchorSat, 21 Jul 2001 12:29:54 GMT
The proper usage for the FileOpenFilter is as follows... IFlUpl1.FileOpenFilter "Image Files(*.jpg *.jpeg),*.jpg;*.jpeg,All Files(*.*),*.*,"]]>Tim Diliberto Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:29:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/visual-basic-vb/posting-files-to-your-intranet-or-extranet9001#commentsAnchor