http://www.windowsitpro.com/authors/author/author/5073881/rsscomment/5073881en-USSun, 27 May 2012 06:01:14 GMTSun, 27 May 2012 06:01:14 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/remote-computing/remote-access-management-with-radius#commentsAnchorSun, 18 May 2008 18:19:11 GMT
Slamlander, I’m sorry you couldn’t find the information you were looking for in this article. I’ve added a Learning Path (to the right of the article near the top of the page) that provides some links to additional articles on the topic. Thanks for reading!]]>AnneSun, 18 May 2008 18:19:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/remote-computing/remote-access-management-with-radius#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/remote-computing/remote-access-management-with-radius#commentsAnchorSun, 18 May 2008 08:26:59 GMT
This is not the article that was promised. I’m looking for a HowTo for RADIUS server setup in Win2K.]]>Slamlander Sun, 18 May 2008 08:26:59 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/remote-computing/remote-access-management-with-radius#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorThu, 15 May 2008 14:51:36 GMT
Tallarico, I apologize for that problem. I’ve changed the access level on this article to Registered User, so you should be able to read it now.]]>AnneThu, 15 May 2008 14:51:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorThu, 15 May 2008 12:39:41 GMT
Darn. Learning path for a Windows IT Pro article points me to an article that I don’t have access to.]]>RYANThu, 15 May 2008 12:39:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorTue, 25 Mar 2008 05:21:30 GMT
good]]>MaximTue, 25 Mar 2008 05:21:30 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ldap/using-ad-to-authenticate-unix-users#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorMon, 03 Sep 2007 22:43:29 GMT
I was having some major issues with Vista syncing the time. I found this article and finally solved the problem.]]>MikeMon, 03 Sep 2007 22:43:29 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/using-comti-to-connect-nt-and-ibm-mainframes#commentsAnchorThu, 12 May 2005 08:43:38 GMT
Very Useful and well written. Provided clear understanding of COMTI. ]]>Anonymous User Thu, 12 May 2005 08:43:38 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/using-comti-to-connect-nt-and-ibm-mainframes#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorFri, 25 Mar 2005 10:50:01 GMT
One of the pitfalls of NET TIME is that it does wierd things on an NT network if the ’time server’ is not available. We tried this method, and it worked well until a hub went out. Then, the computers on the rest of our network was set back to 1900...we had set up a script to adjust the time automatically. We can’t use the time service since we are on our own net and have no access (for security reasons) to either the internet or the web. So....then what?]]>Anonymous User Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:50:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorFri, 18 Mar 2005 07:56:35 GMT
It seems that you must use a domain account if you want to synchronize from a PDC ? Did you experienced that because using a local account doesn’t work for me]]>Anonymous User Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:56:35 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/bind-on-win2k-or-nt#commentsAnchorSat, 26 Feb 2005 18:52:24 GMT
This was useless.]]>DARRELLSat, 26 Feb 2005 18:52:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/bind-on-win2k-or-nt#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/steelhead-s-ospf-routing#commentsAnchorWed, 16 Feb 2005 01:36:36 GMT
very clear and helpful]]>Anonymous User Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:36:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/steelhead-s-ospf-routing#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/digital-signature-technology#commentsAnchorThu, 10 Feb 2005 07:33:57 GMT
very useful article]]>Anonymous User Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:33:57 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/digital-signature-technology#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorWed, 19 Jan 2005 09:26:21 GMT
Hi..... Nice Article..... I came to know about the origin of OSI as well as TCP.......But what are the reasons behind OSI not being impemented?]]>Anonymous User Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:26:21 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/how-ip-multicasting-works#commentsAnchorTue, 11 Jan 2005 22:35:09 GMT
Very useful doc]]>Anonymous User Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:35:09 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/how-ip-multicasting-works#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/be-prepared-for-ip-multicasting-applications#commentsAnchorTue, 11 Jan 2005 10:42:24 GMT
This article was very helpful in trying to understand multicasting!]]>Anonymous User Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:42:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/be-prepared-for-ip-multicasting-applications#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/using-comti-to-connect-nt-and-ibm-mainframes#commentsAnchorThu, 06 Jan 2005 13:11:56 GMT
On this page, under title COMTI Functionality, I believe there is a syntactical error under "Listing 1". You have "if ret >= 0 then" where it should be "if ret = 0 then".]]>Anonymous User Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:11:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/using-comti-to-connect-nt-and-ibm-mainframes#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/steelhead-s-ospf-routing#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 2004 14:06:27 GMT
good and easy to understand. Thank you.]]>Anonymous User Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:06:27 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-client/steelhead-s-ospf-routing#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorMon, 22 Nov 2004 05:57:20 GMT
if it ll be more clear then we can easy to learn. make clear everything.]]>Anonymous User Mon, 22 Nov 2004 05:57:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/the-next-generation-ip-in-action#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Nov 2004 20:36:26 GMT
Excellent article on IPV6. Inculcates the interest to know more about IPV6. Thanks]]>Anonymous User Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:36:26 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/the-next-generation-ip-in-action#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorWed, 17 Nov 2004 20:28:43 GMT
The Article is EXCELLENT. Expalined in a simple and precise manner which is rearely found these days. Thanks.]]>Anonymous User Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:28:43 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorFri, 12 Nov 2004 20:55:47 GMT
gracias por compartir informacion necesaria para poder actualizar el haber en el area de redes ]]>Anonymous User Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:55:47 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorMon, 01 Nov 2004 16:56:20 GMT
If group policy is not available, you can look into NTRIGHTS (I think its part of the NT reskit), to remotely change the workstation user rights (i.e. grant time rights). There should also be a version that works for 2k. Once users have the appropriate perms, a simple net time command in their login script should solve sync probs.]]>Anonymous User Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:56:20 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorSun, 23 May 2004 09:10:47 GMT
I am a Computer Science student, revising for exams. This information really clarified a possible exam question on IPv4 comparison with IPv6. Excellent Source!]]>IrfanSun, 23 May 2004 09:10:47 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorWed, 19 May 2004 04:52:28 GMT
Grace - XP / 2k both need user rights amended for users to sync time. Try gpedit.msc & drill through from there]]>dave mascall Wed, 19 May 2004 04:52:28 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorTue, 18 May 2004 11:25:57 GMT
Great article, straight to the point. Thumbs up!]]>LivingstonTue, 18 May 2004 11:25:57 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorFri, 14 May 2004 16:35:01 GMT
Very clear, short and sweet. Thank you.]]>DanFri, 14 May 2004 16:35:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorSat, 24 Apr 2004 11:39:13 GMT
Very clear and precise! Comparing both IPv4 and IPv6 makes your explanation very clear and to the point.]]>Kifer Sat, 24 Apr 2004 11:39:13 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorTue, 09 Mar 2004 06:17:01 GMT
This is great, but i have a problem with net time on users with out domain admin right, however it works perfectly well for users with domain admin right, user a windows nt server and windows 200 professional workstations]]>Grace Oniyama Tue, 09 Mar 2004 06:17:01 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/active-directory/directory-integration-and-the-metadirectory#commentsAnchorWed, 24 Dec 2003 21:41:06 GMT
HI, I read your article. I want to try a small thing. I want to write such a query that can give me result of my all file names and its sizes. Can you please let me know the solution of this please?]]>RahulWed, 24 Dec 2003 21:41:06 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/active-directory/directory-integration-and-the-metadirectory#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorMon, 23 Jun 2003 10:45:24 GMT
Using psexec.exe from sysinternal.com, you can create a batch job (e.g. place the following command in a .bat or .cmd file to sync the time with the first time server seen): net time /domain:mydomain /set /y To synchronize a large group of systems you could run: for /f %i IN (list.txt) DO psexec \\%i -c time_sync.cmd where list.txt is a list of the systems requiring a sync and time_sync.cmd is the batch listed above.]]>Sino Lavric Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:45:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/dig-for-dns-information#commentsAnchorThu, 03 Apr 2003 07:20:24 GMT
An article discussing a tool without even a link to the tool itself! I know, 2001, but still, that is just silly.]]>Cymen Vig Thu, 03 Apr 2003 07:20:24 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/dns/dig-for-dns-information#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Aug 2002 06:43:46 GMT
Excellent article.]]>Bjarni Jonsson Thu, 22 Aug 2002 06:43:46 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorMon, 25 Mar 2002 03:24:51 GMT
Is there any way to change the local PC time, from a remote machine. Eg. Can a administrator change the time of a NT machine, from his own desktop, remotely on the LAN?]]>Rajiv Pereira Mon, 25 Mar 2002 03:24:51 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorMon, 11 Feb 2002 04:41:35 GMT
That’s a very good article. I was searching for a way to configure the Time service in W2K domain to have a bit different hiererarchy than the default Microsoft implementation. My objective is to have another server (DC) synchronizing with the external NTP server, and not the PDC Emulator doing that. I tried by configuring the external source using net time /setsntp:servername and it works fine, but other computers in a domain continue to sync with PDC emulator even if I added the ReliableTimeSource entry, value 1, to the registry. Is there something else to do? Thanks ]]>Zoran Draganic Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:41:35 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorTue, 13 Nov 2001 06:42:02 GMT
Hi Tom, I think that it should work as you describe for creating a secdonary zone and getting the records over. That’s basically what NT and Win2K do, I don’t see why the UNIX server would not be able to do it with Win2K, as long as it’s the most current version. Have you thought about just copying the "zone" files from UNIX to Windows? When restoring DNS, those are the files that are required in NT. I don’t know how this would work if you integrated your DNS into Active Directory, but it would be logical that it would not be any different... except that there would be no zone files in the integrated version. Let us know. Cheers.]]>KevinTue, 13 Nov 2001 06:42:02 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorSat, 29 Sep 2001 10:00:52 GMT
Fantastic article. I have read the Microsoft Official Curriculum and 3rd party books...None of them were as explanatory and clear as this article was. Everything I needed to know was covered. Thanks!]]>Graham Thompson Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:00:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/public-key-infrastructure-in-windows-2000#commentsAnchorThu, 12 Apr 2001 18:06:48 GMT
I would be interested in obtaining a Best Practice if it exists for setting up CA within Windows 2000. Understanding that the way CA is implemented is going to be different for each individual organization, having a baseline or template to follow would be extremely helpful for those going through this process for the first time.]]>Stacy M. Williams Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:06:48 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/public-key-infrastructure-in-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorThu, 22 Feb 2001 19:41:23 GMT
Excellent article. Thank you very much.]]>Joseph Lamoree Thu, 22 Feb 2001 19:41:23 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorWed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:32 GMT
We want to make our Windows 2000 DNS server a secondary DNS for the Unix Primary DNS. We host over 800 domains and *really* want to avoid having to plug each domain into Win2K’s DNS program manually. Is there a batch command that will automatically download and setup the domains? With unix DNS, you just turn up the secondary and the primary transfers the files automatically. ]]>Tom Gilmer Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:51:32 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorWed, 20 Dec 2000 14:17:00 GMT
Mr Westlake, I got here via www.winntmag.com, not win2000, so this online mag is as relevant to NT as it is to 2000, and furthermore the article you have found is from 1997, considerably before Win2k. Try a search including 2000 in the parameters, which will probably remove NT specific articles.]]>Nige Wingate Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:17:00 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/backup-recovery/build-redundant-ip-routing#commentsAnchorThu, 16 Nov 2000 12:20:40 GMT
Hi, I still understand the following basic question: We have 3 SDSL lines, from different ISPs, on totally different network segments. We want to connect a webserver to all the 3 lines with 3 NICs. In the DNS we can put 3 IPs for our domain for network load sharing. My question is: how do we setup routing on the webserver? Does it work to put a default gateway for each NIC? (Each DSL line has a router which should be the default gateway if we connect only to one line.) Thank you.]]>Yuan P Li Thu, 16 Nov 2000 12:20:40 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/backup-recovery/build-redundant-ip-routing#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/xml/microsoft-s-biztalk-initiative#commentsAnchorWed, 20 Sep 2000 10:29:44 GMT
I’ve just installed the beta version of BizTalk server 2000. I was trying to follow your article to configure BTS 2000, but it seems that the BizTalk management desk supplied with this version is completely different from the one shown in your article. It seems that concepts like "Input/Output Agreement" do not exist in this version. Am I doing something wrong (i.e there is a more recent version)? Is this just another situation where Microsoft decided to completely change terminology between beta versions? Many thanks in advance. ]]>Hugo Esperanca Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:29:44 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/xml/microsoft-s-biztalk-initiative#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorWed, 20 Sep 2000 08:05:31 GMT
Thanks for a laconic and interesting article. I’m studying pC engineering at University and I would be grateful if you could provide more detailed description of the ISO/OSI Reference Model. It may be both: through your magazine or directly to my e-mail. ]]>AntiranikWed, 20 Sep 2000 08:05:31 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/tcpip/iso-osi-ieee-802-2-and-tcp-ip#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorFri, 18 Aug 2000 09:06:33 GMT
Excellent article. You folks should try and get MSFT to sub-contract their KB articles to you! I would like to know any the limitations of using Microsoft’s time service as opposed to a more robust time sync-ing service. I am also interested more in how the NT5DS synchronizes without ever going out to establish a time source ... Thanks.]]>Chris Goodliffe Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:06:33 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorTue, 01 Aug 2000 23:08:54 GMT
Firstly, thanks for the article, it’s amazing how this much detail is absent from Microsoft’s documentation. I would like to see a clarification on the synchronization types, NT5DS and NTP. Is it the case that for both types SNTP is what goes out on the wire, but with NT5DS the hierarchy is provided by AD whereas with NTP and NTP server must be manually specified.]]>Jeff Lospinoso Tue, 01 Aug 2000 23:08:54 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/windows-2000-vs-windows-nt-time-synchronization#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorSun, 02 Jul 2000 09:43:36 GMT
Okay, so now how about Windows 2000? This online magazine is called Windows 2000 Magazine, right? This article is great for pre Win2K, but Win2K includes a Time Server service but unfortunately includes basically no documentation to configure it. There’s no timeserv.ini, etc., etc., etc.]]>Wayne Westlake Sun, 02 Jul 2000 09:43:36 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/public-key-infrastructure-in-windows-2000#commentsAnchorThu, 29 Jun 2000 17:53:58 GMT
The article states that PKI uses a private key for encryption and a public key for decryption. To my knowledge any useful asymetric encryption uses both private and public keys for decryption and encryption. When encrypting with private key decryption happens with public, when encrypting with public key decryption happes with private key. To ensure the identity of both sender and reciever messages have to be encrypted with recievers public key followed by encryption with senders private key.]]>John Dsane Andersen Thu, 29 Jun 2000 17:53:58 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-2000/public-key-infrastructure-in-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/surfing-web-caching-technology-part-2#commentsAnchorTue, 30 May 2000 16:12:11 GMT
Web caching is just in the beginning stages of development. Webhosting companies like yours and mine need simple methods to control caching properties of reverse proxy servers that are internal to our companies. Ad revenue drives many dot coms. Public caching on the net can kill hit stats. In the authors article, straight forward methods to pin pages with non-cacheable items for hit stats are given. All dot coms are pushing to roll out new features to improve their sites. It is common to have a large disconnect between the content creators and the support staff responsible to reliability maintain the performance of the site. With this disconnect it is often difficult if not impossible to achieve site redesign for distribution elegant and efficacy. Content creators often are often bitten early by caching of non-cacheable objects. They all seem to know the magic headers to kill caching. Ignorance of headers and their proper use seem to permeate or industry from the largest dot coms to the smallest mom and pop websites. Just look at the headers of the images served from your favorite portal. If you can find a tool to do so. If you find one that is really correct, I would like to know about it. I have been seeking for some time an elegant and efficient means to control a reverse proxy cache object by object and in discussions with several colleges a suggestion has surfaced. Here are the premises: We want to be able to control the behavior of our internal reverse proxy cache (object by object)without disrupting the HTTP headers that are set for the world at large. We don’t want a standard header that might be identified by some forward proxy downstream. It would seem obvious to all, that a user defined header for the site, used as a directive to the internal reverse proxy server to specify the number of seconds for an object to live would be a simple way to have the necessary control. Content creators could set this simply and they could adjust the normal HTTP headers as well to control caching of pages at external caches also. Life would be great….or so I think….]]>Peter Cole Tue, 30 May 2000 16:12:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/surfing-web-caching-technology-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorThu, 25 May 2000 10:44:26 GMT
We have set roaming profiles in our PDC. We are using NET TIME to synchronize time with our PDC and BDC. What I have to investigate is if we can synchronize our PDC and BDC, with a Solaris machine running as a Time Server? Any feedback will be appreciated. ]]>Tonci Korsano Thu, 25 May 2000 10:44:26 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorTue, 25 Apr 2000 18:33:11 GMT
In the article you state "You must assign Change the system time to the user on the workstation so that NET TIME can work." Is there an easier way to do this instead of going to every workstation in the domain and assigning the right?]]>Boyd Bauguess Tue, 25 Apr 2000 18:33:11 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorMon, 17 Apr 2000 08:14:38 GMT
A good set of information on a topic that is not too easily located.]]>Mr. A. J. White Mon, 17 Apr 2000 08:14:38 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/time-synchronization/time-synchronization-in-an-nt-network#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/surfing-web-caching-technology-part-2#commentsAnchorSat, 18 Mar 2000 17:11:41 GMT
Really, an excellent article which explains the technolgy very nicely in simple language. Congates!!!]]>kunjal parikh - student cs 755 Sat, 18 Mar 2000 17:11:41 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internet/surfing-web-caching-technology-part-2#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorWed, 16 Feb 2000 16:29:34 GMT
I think that Your Article is great. Not only do You manage to explain what IPv6 is but You also manage to compare it to IPv4 and still it is very easy to understand and You only used one page. Many people would have written several pages to tell the same thing.]]>Ronnie Andreasen Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:29:34 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-addressing/what-s-new-in-the-ipv6-header-#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorWed, 26 Jan 2000 16:41:52 GMT
The "Printable Version" is too broad, so that you cannot print it :(]]>Fabian Warkalla Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:41:52 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/unix/integrating-unix-dns-with-windows-2000#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/active-directory/directory-integration-and-the-metadirectory#commentsAnchorMon, 04 Oct 1999 11:17:04 GMT
Tao Zhou’s "Directory Integration and the Metadirectory" (July) states, "Novell’s retired Workstation Manager implemented a similar function but used NDS as a single point of control. (Novell replaced Workstation Manager with NDS for NT.)" Novell has not retired Workstation Manager--­it’s still a useful component of Novell ZENworks.

Workstation Manager lets you manage Windows NT user and desktop configurations in Novell Directory Services (NDS). With Workstation Manager, you can dynamically create a local NT account if it doesn’t exist on a workstation. This capability is extremely useful for companies that don’t log on to a domain (i.e., they have local accounts on their workstations). Workstation Manager, like NetWare Application Launcher (NAL), started off as a free, standalone utility. Now, Novell offers both tools in its ZENworks Starter Pack, which is free for NetWare 4.x and later users.

NDS for NT replaced Novell Administrator for Windows NT (not to be confused with the NT version of NetWare Administrator--­NWAdminNT). Novell Administrator for Windows NT lets you synchronize your NT domain with NDS to manage NT users and groups with NWAdmin. NDS for NT doesn’t synchronize the NT domain with NDS; it migrates the NT domain to NDS.
--­Shawn Rappaport]]>Shawn Rappaport Mon, 04 Oct 1999 11:17:04 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/active-directory/directory-integration-and-the-metadirectory#commentsAnchorhttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/legacy/queuing-data-with-microsoft-message-queue-server#commentsAnchorFri, 13 Aug 1999 07:23:56 GMT
I love the "print friendly" option you have placed on all the articles. All of your articles, like this one, are a great help to me. Whenever I am unclear about any NT subject, I can come and look up your articles database for materials, rather than buying a book. It is a must resource. Thank you.]]>Joseph Song Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:23:56 GMThttp://www.windowsitpro.com/article/legacy/queuing-data-with-microsoft-message-queue-server#commentsAnchor