Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

April 25, 2005 12:00 AM

WinHEC 2005: Gates Touts x64, Longhorn

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #46173
Rating: (6)

As expected, Microsoft Chairman and Chief Software Architect Bill Gates opened the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) 2005 Monday morning with a keynote address that highlighted first the x64 versions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP, then Longhorn, the next Windows version. I outlined most of Gates's announcements in my WinHEC preview. Today, I'd like to discuss some other information that he and other Microsoft executives shared during the first day of WinHEC.

Regarding the emergence of 64-bit mainstream computing, Gates humorously noted that he never claimed that 640KB would be "enough for anyone." However, he did say that the massive memory address spaces allowed by the x64 platform would be enough for years and years. "Eventually, of course, some application will come along that needs more [RAM than x64 offers]," he noted. He pledged that Microsoft would support the x64 platform with 64-bit versions of Microsoft SQL Server 2005, Visual Studio 2005, Commerce Server 2006, Host Integration Server 2006, BizTalk Server 2006, and Services for UNIX this year, and with 64-bit versions of Windows Longhorn Server, Exchange 12, Microsoft Operations Manager, Virtual Server, and Windows Server Compute Cluster Edition in the next 2 years.

Gates put the migration to 64-bit computing into perspective by discussing the transitions to 16-bit and 32-bit computing that took place in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. But the transition to 64-bit computing, he said, would actually be easier than previous transitions because of the binary compatibility between 32-bit x86 applications and the x64 platform.

Although I had been apprised of the mobile hardware announcements Gates would make at the show, two things surprised me. First, the screens used by many auxiliary displays on Longhorn-era notebook computers and Tablet PCs will be color and will closely resemble the displays on Windows Mobile devices. Second, Gates referred to the 9-inch Tablet PC-like device as "Ultra Mobile 2007"; other executives later revealed that the device is code-named Haiku.

Also new was word that the legacy Win32 API would be augmented with Longhorn features so that developers can add these features more easily to legacy applications. Previously, Microsoft said that the Longhorn features would be available only through the managed code WinFX APIs.

Although interesting, the Longhorn demonstrations that Gates and others provided were visually unimpressive, falling short of the graphical excellence found today in Apple Computer's Mac OS X. However, various Microsoft representatives told me that the Aero Glass UI demonstrated during the keynote wasn't the final user experience and that later beta releases would look dramatically nicer. Still, the Aero Glass interface that Gates demonstrated supported OS X-like transparencies, translucencies, animations, and other effects. Gates also showed off application scaling, which will help legacy applications display correctly on the high-dpi displays of the future, and a media-oriented sample application that takes advantage of Longhorn's display features.

Longhorn will feature a search box directly in the Start menu because that's where people start doing things in Windows, according to Microsoft. Longhorn will support virtual folders that collect links to documents into logical groups. For example, Longhorn will ship with default virtual folders called All Documents, Authors, Keywords, Rating, Recent, and Types.

Longhorn's icons will be particularly impressive. Because they are based on raster graphics technology and not bitmaps, they scale correctly to any resolution. They also display in a special thumbnail mode that graphically shows the contents of each file. So, for example, the icon for a Word document in Longhorn displays a miniature version of the first page of that document and a Microsoft PowerPoint slide show icon displays the first slide. Even folder icons appear to contain the actual files that reside in the folder.

In a separate address, Microsoft Senior Vice President Will Poole, who oversees the company's Windows Client Business division, discussed various Longhorn features. In addition to discussing Longhorn's Limited user account security functionality, which I initially revealed in my "Road to Windows Longhorn 2005" showcase on the SuperSite for Windows (http://www.winsupersite.com/article/showcase/the-road-to-windows-longhorn-2005.aspx), Poole talked about how a "virtual registry" feature will provide backward compatibility with legacy applications in the new environment. And he revealed that the game controllers for the next-generation Xbox 2 will be Longhorn compatible, providing a single controller for both video game consoles and PCs.


Both Gates and Poole discussed the new Longhorn timeline, although each presentation provided unique information. The new timeline places the final delivery of the product some 6 months later than previously expected. Under the new schedule, Microsoft will deliver Longhorn Beta 1 this summer, then ship a second Developer Preview build in September at the Professional Developers Conference (PDC) 2005. After that, the company will ship Beta 2 and release a public beta. Microsoft says it will ship Longhorn in time for the 2006 holiday selling season, which places the final release in the August 2006 to November 2006 time frame. Poole said that Microsoft would lock down the Longhorn Fundamentals in Beta 1; lock down the APIs in the second developer preview build, which will ship at PDC 2005; and finalize the end-user features in Beta 2.

 

If you're interested in more timely WinHEC 2005 updates, you'll find them at both the WinInfo Daily UPDATE Web site  and the SuperSite for Windows, which I update each day. The WinInfo site includes daily blog postings; the SuperSite includes photo and screenshot galleries and other updates.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jul 26, 2005

    Trying to compare Mac` OS X to Windows XP SP2 is like comparing a rotten apple (pun not intended) to a ripe bananna. OS/X looks like a great innovation for Mac, just like Windows Vista is sure to revolutionize how PC users work. From only 2nd-hand accounts of OS/X and being a personal user of XP SP/2, I think it is pretty much a take-your-pick, and it is my opinion that Mac should enter the real world of computing by making an OS you could stick right over Windows. As far as he latest versions of Windows/Mac being abount even, I should make a comparison.

    Windows XP's features fresh UI, better system management, and bigger security. This on top of the reliable business core that MS has been using for years (Windows NT Code Base). THey also added a few things here and there, but one doesn't really need many programs withing the OS, because in the PC world, it's all about choice. My big thing with XP is that unlesss you have 256 MB of memory, painfully slow stratups are in store. But this is getting noticeably better between operating systems put out by Microsoft (I hate you, Windows Me).Mac OS/X was featured as more than a new look, but instead a new base of code that was steady, reliable, & compatible. I think the UI & Control Panel were pretty cool, and I really want an iPod, but it has its issues. For instance, if "compatible" means shipping me off to solitary confinement to run the previous version of Office for Mac or something else from the non-OS/X generation is totally crazy. Secondly, I've heard from someone who favors Mac that the networking configuration stuff is horrid. Again, this is second-hand info, but it was from a Mac enthusiast. Steve Jobs is a genius for inventiung the iPod, but for his next trick, instead of making a new OS and saying its better without a platform comparison, make something not only better, but actually make something I can stick on my IBM/PC-platform computer, right over Windows, so I don't throw out my entire hardware setup.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    May 30, 2005

    When will you people understand... its not microsoft or apple adding new "toys". Its us the users demanding a easyer way to do things because 95% of us are too stupid and lazy to lean how to use what we have.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    May 17, 2005

    U stand for MacOS just because it's nice face?

    Although Windows XP is not goodlooking enough by default, the mac os gui is NOT so nice either, except 50% icons in mac systems.

    well, mac HAS it's markets, but so has Windows, too.

    think about 3D Graphics on Mac Platform, Terrible!!!!!

    Maya for Mac OS could always be a pain of Alias.
    XSI will never never never comes out a Mac OS version.
    U guys take a look at Lightwave 3D for mac & windows, see the different situations and make your own conclusions.

    ........

    well, mac is mac, not always better than windows!

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    May 01, 2005

    >> Because they are based on raster graphics technology and not bitmaps, they scale correctly to any resolution.

    Finally! It's about time Windows stopped using 32x32 icon bitmaps.

    >> They also display in a special thumbnail mode that graphically shows the contents of each file.

    That's something I thought was quite usful under Linux/KDE, at least for text files. Nice to see Microsoft implementing it.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Apr 28, 2005

    The new Mac OS looks great, better than Windows. But if Mac users had their way, Apple would have a bigger Monopoly than Microsoft and computer prices would be much higher. Thanks to the commoditized nature of PCs and the likes of Michael Dell, PCs offer more value per dollar for most users. By reducing the the power of hardware middleman the only way Apple can provide any value to customers is through innovation, and innovate they do. However, as we know the average person is not willing to fork over more cash for glitz they don't really need. If I need to have the operating system of the future, I'll spend a bit more and get a Mac. If I want to get the most PC for my money, a PC with Windows wins every time.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.