Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
July 07, 2004 12:00 AM

Ballmer Talks Longhorn, Office 12, Microsoft Cost Savings

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #43191
Rating: (1)

Yesterday, in an internal memo intended to rally employees, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer discussed his plans to cut $1 billion in annual expenses while concentrating on future products such as Longhorn, the next major OS release, and Microsoft Office 12, the next version of the company's best-selling office-productivity suite. Ballmer has a lot of work ahead, however. In the memo, he noted the company's problem of moving decisively. And with employee benefits ebbing at a suddenly alarming rate, the enthusiasm of the Microsoft software troops is likely at an all-time low.
  
Microsoft's problems involve more than just a lack of employee enthusiasm, however. Security problems beset the company's most successful products, causing Microsoft to step back from far-reaching projects such as Longhorn to concentrate on near-term security-based solutions. Meanwhile, smaller, faster companies such as Apple Computer are able to steal pages from the Longhorn playbook and implement new features, such as instant searching, more quickly. And open-source competitors such as Linux are starting to win formerly lucrative Microsoft software contracts at an alarming rate.
  
"Will we be first with important innovations?" Ballmer asked his 57,000 employees rhetorically in the memo. "Will process excellence lead to greater ability to make an individual difference? Will our focus on costs hurt employees personally, and will it hinder new investments? Will we grow, and will our stock price rise? Will the PC remain a vital tool, and will we remain a great company? Yes."
  
Ballmer wants Microsoft to operate as a leaner, meaner company, and he's set a goal: The company must save $1 billion in operating costs by the time its next fiscal year ends on June 30. In the past year, the company's operating costs rose sharply--to $18.97 billion from $16.46 the previous year. More important to the bottom line, perhaps, is news that the growth of Microsoft's expenses has outpaced its revenue growth for 3 consecutive years. The company doesn't plan to lay off workers, however, and plans to hire at a rate that's consistent with the past year. Ballmer is asking employees to be more accountable for their work and to prioritize five to seven "measurable commitments" per year.
  
That money is a problem for the cash-rich software giant is somewhat ironic; after all, the company has more than $56 billion in the bank. But profits--which grew at 52 percent annually from 1995 to 1999--have been flat for 3 years. And revenue growth, while healthy at 13 percent since 1999, is down significantly from the 34 percent growth the company experienced from 1995 to 1999.
  
As ever, the Microsoft CEO is bullish on software, noting that PC sales will continue to be key to the company's growth. Ballmer expects the number of PC users to grow to 1 billion by 2010, up from about 600 million today. And he expects the ever-delayed Longhorn to rejuvenate Microsoft's long-term prospects. Longhorn isn't a "short-term revenue pop," he said, unlike the past few Windows upgrades. And although Ballmer doesn't explicitly say as much, he hints that Office 12 will now ship before Longhorn ships. Microsoft has changed its Office 12 plans several times recently. Originally, the company planned to ship Office 12, which the company said then would work only on Longhorn systems, alongside that OS. Earlier this year, the company decided to make Office 12 run on both Longhorn and pre-Longhorn systems, a nod to the fact that user migrations to the new OS will occur over a long time period, not immediately. And now it appears that Office 12 will in fact ship before Longhorn ships and won't include any Longhorn technology, as previously expected.
  
Meanwhile, Microsoft's less-established products haven't fared as well as Windows and Office have. But Ballmer expressed his happiness with up-and-coming businesses such as the MSN Web services and Xbox video game system.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Mar 06, 2005

    Bob: I see your point. All i wish is that microsoft would be consistant. For example office 2003 is completly backward compatable with office 2000 except for publisher. IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE IT COMPATABLE THEN JUST MAKE IT BLOODY COMPATABLE IF NOT THEN LEAVE IT!

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 12, 2005

    No one care about how much us geeks like working on/with computers they want something attractive/shinny that works well and open office ain't gonna cut it. I say the hell with the people who want to live in the past. No backward compatability! Longhorn and office 12 should only look forward. Time to ditch the old software and think out of this box.

  • Bob
    8 years ago
    Jul 08, 2004

    All Ballmer cares about is making money. He is one of the main reasons Microsoft is getting a bad reputation. Get rid of him and give the job to someone who wants to innovate for the love of computing. Not money!. Then your enthusiasm will go up. And Microsoft will once again impress people with their applications and operating systems. One big advantage open source developers have over Windows developers. It's not all about the money!. It's about how much you enjoy using your computer. And sharing that enthusiasm with others.

  • wendy
    8 years ago
    Jul 08, 2004

    Will we be first with important innovations?

    First to announce, second to ship.

    Will process excellence lead to greater ability to make an individual difference?

    LOL...Management-speak. What the hell does this mean?

    Will our focus on costs hurt employees personally, and will it hinder new investments?

    Yes.

    Will we grow, and will our stock price rise?

    Probably. Wall Street loves it when companies engage in layoffs and employee benefit cuts.

    Will the PC remain a vital tool, and will we remain a great company?

    Perhaps. But treat your employees like crap, and Karma's gonna getcha every time.

    Changing Microsoft is like turning the Titanic around. Here's hoping they get something accomplished before an oncoming sea of icebergs sinks them.

  • Vincent Haakmat
    8 years ago
    Jul 07, 2004

    Hi Paul,
    As you've mentioned many times, you rather use firefox than IE to browse the web, because of better security and internet standards. I do agree with you. However In order to read your columns (and windows.net site) one must have IE to be able to read the articles without the ads overlapping the articles. So in order to let the other browser gain acceptence, I think your company also must start complying with standards and set the example. I know it may require a redesign of your site. I was guilty of that too, but I had to do it.
    That was just my 2 cents worth. Please don't see it as a negative, but rather constructive criticsm.


    Editor's note: I don't have anything to do with creating the WinInformant.com Web site. If I did, it would work great in Firefox (compare www.winsupersite.com in IE and Firefox to see the difference; it should be nearly identical in both). My complaints about this have fallen on deaf ears. I'm trying. --Paul

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.