Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
May 09, 2006 12:00 AM

Windows Vista Beta 2 Shapes Up for May 23 Release at WinHEC

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #50243
Rating: (16)

As I've previously reported, Microsoft had planned to ship a variant of Windows Vista build 5381 as Beta 2, the version that the company will be delivering to millions of consumers later this month. However, problems with build 5381 have changed those plans somewhat, along with the schedule for getting Beta 2 into the hands of users. Last weekend, Microsoft surprisingly issued a variant of build 5381 to testers after previously noting that it wouldn't ship any more interim builds before Beta 2.

Now, Microsoft plans to release a DVD of Vista Beta 2 and Office 2007 Beta 2 to attendees of the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) on May 23. Meanwhile, users who wish to obtain a DVD version of Beta 2 via the company's public Web site will have to wait until May 27. Microsoft expects to eventually deliver this version to millions of people.

When asked about the delivery of Beta 2, the company didn't offer any specifics. "We're on track to deliver Beta 2 this quarter, as promised," a Microsoft representative told me. Sources tell me, however, that part of the push behind Beta 2 will be aimed at dispelling rumors propagated by Gartner that Microsoft will delay Vista beyond January 2007. To that end, the software giant will be heavily promoting Beta 2 to users so they can see for themselves how refined Vista has already become.

As for build 5381, Microsoft had iterated through several point releases for that version and finally moved on to subsequent builds. Last weekend, Microsoft shipped build 5382 internally, and it expects to ship build 5383 early next week. Now I'm told that a build 5383 variant (perhaps 5383.5) will likely be declared as Beta 2 sometime late next week. Concurrently, Microsoft is working on post-Beta 2 (or release candidate 1--RC1) builds of Vista as well. Those builds are in the 542x range, my sources say.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Al
    6 years ago
    May 12, 2006

    And I love it when you assert the superior nature of Mac hardware, when in reality it just as good/bad as every other piece of technology out there. Over heating problems, unreliable batteries, easily scratched iPods.

    Apple are no better than MS, Dell etc with their claims Bonch.

  • Preston
    6 years ago
    May 11, 2006

    I love how Microsoft is always "on track" when they're late with something. Total doublespeak over at that company.

  • Lotsa
    6 years ago
    May 10, 2006

    "You can say both and not contradict yourself, mate."

    That's EXACTLY right, outofcoffee. Paul actually wrote:

    "Promises were made. Excitement was generated. None of it, as it turns out, was worth a damn. From a technical standpoint, the version of Windows Vista we will receive is a sad shell of its former self, a shadow. One might still call it a major Windows release. I will, for various reasons. The kernel was rewritten. The graphics subsystem is substantially improved, if a little obviously modeled after that in Mac OS X. Heck, half of the features of Windows Vista seem to have been lifted from Apple's marketing materials."

    He's right. It IS a major Windows release. He's simply saying it could have been even BETTER. For all his bluster, Paul knows what he's talking about when it comes to Windows, and I don't see this as criticism of Vista per se...just a reflection of reality--that at some point, it became less than it could have.

    From the user's perspective, yes, Vista may look like "Windows XP SR3 Eye Candy Edition." But that does NOT mean it's not a major Windows version (no matter what pundits like Dvorak or wiseass folk like me say).

  • Sachin
    6 years ago
    May 10, 2006

    "Just because Vista is a "shadow" of what *IT* might have been, doesn't preclude the fact that it's still "a major Windows version". You can say both and not contradict yourself, mate."

    I haven't made a statement, outofcoffee. I was just wondering why analysts refer to Vista as a version of XP with better graphics at some times and as a major release at other - Dvorak called Vista a "gussied up version of XP". Paul has stated before that Vista is a disappointment from a technical standpoint.

    I personally do think of Vista as a major release and am really looking forward to the final version.

  • out
    6 years ago
    May 10, 2006

    yahoo,

    Just because Vista is a "shadow" of what *IT* might have been, doesn't preclude the fact that it's still "a major Windows version". You can say both and not contradict yourself, mate.

    Your logic doesn't follow

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.