Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

October 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Why, Exactly, Does Everyone "Hate" Vista?

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #97462
Rating: (30)

As I have with every version of Windows since Windows 386, I followed Windows Vista from its early days to its release, writing books, teaching classes, and consulting about the OS that is essentially NT Workstation 6.0. In fact, I think I've picked apart Vista with a more fine-toothed comb than I have on many of its predecessors. And after all my experience with Vista, I must confess complete and total befuddlement at all of the anti-Vista rhetoric that seems to permeate the media like the smell of old cigarettes permeates the Las Vegas hotel room in which I'm writing this. (It's fall conference season, and it seems that every computer conference has decided to descend on Sin City this year.)

If you believe the various pundits, Vista is massively buggy; not being used by anyone; completely lacking in drivers to support virtually any past, present, or future hardware; and is so hated that Vista buyers are giving up and re-installing Windows XP on their systems in droves. This opprobrium would lead an outside observer to conclude that Bill Gates must be mere moments from committing seppuku. Personally, I don't care whether anyone moves to Vista or not. As I've observed many times, the pace of change in PC software was once so great that major changes and improvements in software came every year or so. And in, say, 1985 most PC experts would have scoffed at the possibility of using the same version of any piece of software for six years. That rate of change has slowed so much, however, that many people now use and get a lot of utility out of an eight-and-a-half-year-old piece of software--Windows 2000, and I still run across folks still running copies of its twelve-year-old predecessor, Windows NT Server 4.0. Given that, the idea that people wouldn't feel it necessary to abandon XP (which turns six this month) seems quite reasonable. Heck, if cars weren't subject to mechanical wear, I might drive my Honda Insight for the rest of my life, assuming that the dealer proves successful in un-doing the damage that a rather large stag mule deer did to it a couple of weeks ago. I don't pine for "upgrades" to my car because cars don't see a lot of innovation any more, and as software's innovation rate approaches that of cars, then we may well see 25-year-long life spans for PC software one day, provided that Microsoft stops using the threat of withholding product support as a cattle prod to make buyers upgrade.

Software buyers have always been a bit gun-shy not only of new OSs but of service packs and even patches to those OSs. For as long as I can remember, the same sequence of events occurs every time that Microsoft offers Service Pack X for one of its OSs. "Hey, I wouldn't take a chance on Service Pack X," some "experts" would say. "Nope," they'd advise, "I'd stay with Service Pack X-1." This advice sounds sage until I recall that a year ago, when Service Pack X-1 came out, those same experts counseled me to stay with Service Pack X-2, the "reliable" one. I think Dana Carvey's character "Garth" in the movie Wayne's World explained the situation best for some of those experts, when paraphrased: "We're techies. We fear change." So my journalistic brethren and sistren will always be able to find somebody, lots of somebodies, who view new versions of software with a jaundiced eye.

I guess what I'm saying is that I recall people dead set against NT 4.0, Windows 2000, 2003, and XP when they all originally came out, and there have always been people unhappy with the state of driver support for new OSs, and there have always been those who have upgraded and decided to return to their old OSs. People's reactions to Vista aren't terribly different from the reactions six years ago when XP arrived, so why are their reactions to Vista getting so much media attention?

Ah, I think I've got it. We must be experiencing one of those there's-nothing-good-to-write-about periods that we journalistas experience now and then. Yeah, that must be it. Where are those HP wiretapping incidents when we need them?

Send me your "I hate Vista" or "I love Vista" stories at help@minasi.com . I look forward to hearing from you!

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Rachel
    4 years ago
    Oct 26, 2008

    I love Vista it has alot of security features the other didn't. It updates it's self. It did have glitches in the beginning but after i worked through them it was great. I think what people want is a made to order OS. Which is never going to happen. People have different programs and needs and wants they can't make a OS that is going to work just perfect for everyone. Every time a new OS comes out everyone complains. Everyone says it's horrible it doesn't have the drivers they want, it's slow. I remember when we upgraded to XP on my sisters computer it couldn't handle it. After a few yrs they made the computer to fit the OS. Now it fits XP and soon they will fit Vista. People just have to be patient...
    Good luck with that though.

  • BrockH
    4 years ago
    Jan 02, 2008

    I think Windows Vista is allowing the real IT professionals to shine through, and the ones who are just stumbling about to loose their footing.

    For example, a previous comment:
    "I again ask - how does that make any sense? What security enhancement does that provide if it allows me to simply copy files to the HD, but makes me do it in 2 steps rather than one in order to get them to their ultimate destination?"

    Do you not know of the security threats removable media presents? It makes perfect sense for the system to not allow something to be directly copied into a protected directory (such as a directory for program configurations?) from a CD.

    "Lastly, my dual core Dell w/ Vista proved no faster than my creaky Dell P4 running XP Pro. How can that be??? Faster bus speeds, faster chips, a clean OS. ???"

    Quite the accusation there, can you even back that up? Or do you just try and prove things with "gut feelings"?

    "2-It's a resourse hog, the minimum amount of ram to run Vista effeciantly should be 1.5GB, I have 2GB and on idle it's at 1GB acording to task manager"

    An example of the someone who doesn't not know how to control the operating system they're using. Learn about Windows services, features, and prefetching. You can customize them to minimize memory usage.

    You're saying Vista is too hard to learn how to use? Windows XP is easier? It has been out six years, of course you're going to know how to use it -- it wasn't any easier of a transition.

    I could go on but I have other things to do...

  • Roger
    5 years ago
    Dec 26, 2007

    I've gone back and forth with Vista. Installing and uninstalling, weighing the pros and cons. Have done this as nausem since Vista was in beta. Conclusion? XP Pro works at work, XP Home works at home. Vista Home Premium and Basic work at home. Vista Business is out of reach for work because it is just too much for our old apps to handle. Period.

  • ALIAKSEI
    5 years ago
    Dec 05, 2007

    Also you guys blaming Vista for all the faults with you smarphoes, and programs. Blame them - not Vista. As I tell before VISTA IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM XP (insides and GUI). Very lazy programmers don't support Vista much, because it required some study...time...effort. Better blame....its easier

  • ALIAKSEI
    5 years ago
    Dec 05, 2007

    Vista is very different OS. Get it guys! If you copy files from CD to you boot drive root Vista will tell you that is not possible - its risky. Which is true. Copy to My documents or drive D, E.... or flash or external drive. Why to collect garbage on boot drive?

    Security wise Vista much more superior than XP. That's the fact. If you feel losted on Vista go downgrade to Gameboy!

    I love Vista, stable predictable and fast platform (if you have right hardware of course).

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.