Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
August 27, 2003 12:00 AM

The Soul of Windows Revisited

How Microsoft is trying to win back IT administrators
Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #39749
Rating: (0)

Microsoft might have lost its focus on serving the IT community during the past several years, but the company is now making a valiant effort to get back into this group's good graces. In "The Soul of Windows," January 2003, http://www.winnetmag.com, InstantDoc ID 27392, I wrote that Microsoft was in danger of losing support from the IT community because of two factors.

First, Microsoft's marketing messages to the IT community are unclear. Advertising-driven concepts such as "One Degree of Separation" don't mean much to administrators. The company lacks a clear vision for Windows administrators.

Second, Microsoft takes its enterprise IT customers for granted. The company assumes we'll all upgrade to the newest technology simply because Microsoft ships it. Microsoft's presumption might have cost the company more than a billion dollars in delayed revenue because the company is still trying to get 4.5 million Windows NT servers migrated to Windows Server 2003 or Windows 2000. As several readers commented in letters to Windows & .NET Magazine in response to my article, Microsoft assumed that NT users would upgrade, so the company didn't bother to communicate with IT pros or advertise to them.

Since I wrote that column, I've learned about several projects Microsoft has initiated to better serve its IT customers' needs. The company launched some of these projects long before I wrote my column and initiated others after my column appeared*at least one in response to my column. (For example, Microsoft invited me to present readers' responses to my article to a group of eight Microsoft executives.)

Microsoft's community-building efforts will start with user group representatives. First, Microsoft has formed a 15-member IT Leader Advisory Council whose purpose is "to improve and foster Microsoft's two-way relationship with the IT groups and meet a set of shared objectives." One of the group's first tasks is to determine these shared objectives. The council members include presidents from 14 of the largest IT user groups, plus me. Our job is to help Microsoft assess the needs of Windows IT user groups and promote the Windows community. Microsoft intentionally focuses on a small subset of the IT professional community. The idea is to develop programs that work, then widen the circle based on the successes of the smaller group.

As a result of our first meeting, Microsoft agreed to use the Windows 2003 launch events to help promote the user groups that the IT Leader Advisory Council represents. The council members were able to offer their user group members a free 25-user edition of Windows 2003, Enterprise Edition as well as a Windows 2003 book from Microsoft Press. To get these products, members simply had to attend a specific regional launch event and the subsequent user group meeting in that region. That $2500-plus value helped boost user group memberships in those supported regions and generated goodwill among IT administrators.

In addition, Microsoft is planning to fund and conduct an exclusive Webcast and 1-day training event for each of the council members' users groups. Finally, Microsoft adopted the council members into its existing Most Valuable Professional (MVP) program. MVPs are actively involved in the online Windows community. You can see a list of Windows 2003 MVPs at http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/community/mvp. Microsoft is beefing up its support of the MVP program and corresponding Windows newsgroups, which in turn will boost the Windows IT community online. Again, many of these programs will first benefit the user group council members; then, Microsoft will extend successful programs to the entire Windows IT community.

Beyond user groups, Microsoft is sponsoring regional road shows and Webcasts that provide practical information for migrating from NT Server to Windows 2003 and Win2K. Microsoft intends to triple the number of Windows-related Webcasts available on Microsoft's Web site in an effort to boost the knowledge of the IT professional community.

Microsoft Renews Its Vows
As evidence of Microsoft's renewed interest in IT professionals, I've noticed changes in Microsoft's TV ad campaigns. The new ads show an IT administrator getting excited about the technical reasons he successfully upgraded to Windows 2003, then translating those reasons into terms his chief financial officer (CFO) would understand: "It saved us 1 million dollars." By aiming an ad at both IT administrators and CFOs, Microsoft is hitting what's really happening in the market. IT professionals know they have to go the extra mile to justify every major IT capital expenditure and make the business payoffs quickly obvious to even the toughest CFO.

Microsoft knows it has a long way to go to regain the trust of Windows administrators. But the expressed commitment from senior Microsoft executives is encouraging, and it's starting to bear some fruit. I applaud Microsoft for its phase-one efforts to reach out to the IT professional community, and I want to see this effort grow in the future.

Phase-two efforts will include a rollout of Load Fests, events at which user group members can load Windows 2003 and other Microsoft products on their own machines in a coached session, similar to the Linux community's InstallFest.

If you have specific ideas about how Microsoft can improve relations with the Windows administrator community, I'd like to hear them. Through the IT Leader Advisory Council, we now have a forum we can use to communicate with Microsoft representatives who can act on those ideas.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Ben Ahlquist
    8 years ago
    Mar 03, 2004

    How does one find out who these user groups are, that are involved with this Advisory Council to Microsoft?

  • Chris Marsden
    8 years ago
    Feb 27, 2004

    Costs, Microsoft charge for a server licence, they charge for a client OS licence, they charge for a client access licence to use the two together, they then charge to train the administrators who require the knowledge to technically implement their software. Administrators are currently Microsoft's only real friends, IT business managers are only interested in going to the board with cost savings and will not go and ask for money to implement a new solution when the old one works fine and this is the problem. Windows98 and NT still work so why move is what the board ask? They are told there are technical reasons and they dismiss the request. More and more it is the technicians who have to make the business case and they are not given enough support, credit or reward to do this by the employer or companies like Microsoft. Microsoft should be doing a lot more for this group, without their support Microsoft do not have a future because open source will take over, because on paper it looks cheaper and that’s the bottom line.

  • Wade Hoffarth
    8 years ago
    Feb 26, 2004

    During the past 24 years I have manufactured, installed and supported thousands of computers and servers, and I administered to hundreds of networks. Often I support other consulting firms when they cannot find sufficient answers to their woes using the avaialable (and often costly) support options that MS offers, and they in turn have supported me when I could not find answers or help I was seeking. I personally maintain my working knowledge of the industry daily. I read computer manuals every night, test network scenarios and solutions, and I do so for hours after coming home from working in the field every day. I test new MS products as (usually) received through my action pack subscriptions, and I attend events as I can afford to or when time allows. I serve my customers needs daily and when a client calls me I do everything possible to resolve problems quickly and do so without the benefit of Microsofts backing or support. Sure, I get the same calls from Microsoft (almost daily) asking if I'd like to add "this and that" service to my network inventory, but everything comes at a cost and the price is almost always just too high. In 1996 I received my MCSE certification while in my 6th year of administering a small network of just over three hundred machines, most of which I built by hand, run by servers I built to make use of the latest technology. Quickly enough after that certification was earned, I was hired to administer a fairly large network of 11,000 pcs that had over 30,000 end users. I did so with the support of only two other individuals (both in their young 20's) and quickly found that while we had officially contracted for MS support we had no Microsoft techs in the wings that knew anything more about their systems than I did? Within a year I had enough e-mail siasters with Exchange, server crashes from and AD integration with Novell that couldn't officially be supported, and other woeful tales that soon led me to the decision to return to the more sane surroundings of my own small consulting business. What I found in terms of Microsoft supporting me in all these environments has often left me looking for alternative means of resolution when faced with the really tough issues. If you seek suport for MS products when integrating with any other products, the support line goes dead. User groups and webinars are about all I can stand anymore as all the professional launches, conferences and various sponsored events still leave me selling sold short, if not short of cash and they give little or no information on how things get done as much as they are ad events promoting the latest and greatest whatever. AD migrations prove to be hard to achieve, and without secondary support options which now are far too costly for me, and adding the idea that anyone would ever have to integrate a Novell system in the mix, or Linux is professional suicide in my eyes? Today, I manage small business networks (50 pcs and under only) and my end users who often find themselves treading the qaugmire of Microsofts wake of product saturations have lost intereest in the stereotypical rederick. With the constant upgrades, patches, new products and lack of support for those still existing products which seem to have been forgotten by the rolling Microsoft machine, many of them (like me) have felt like turning back to paper and pencil. I'm not so sure that MS is wrong for doing what they do when they charge for support resolution. But, to mass market their products to so many admins, who understand so little about what they are getting into and to lend so little real support when things go bad... it's a wonder some days that Businesses get along as well as they do? From someone that holds 16 certifications from Microsoft, Novell, Prosoft and Comp-TIA that may sound sadly familiar to far too many admins who are hurting for answers. I still run Windows 2003 servers, and manage Novell networks as well but the thrill of working in IT has soured because of the lack of support I receive as an MS administrator, MCSE and end user of their products. Even though I still feel good when I can help others get their businesses back on track when things go bad, it's hardly enough. And still I hold out hope for better tomorrows. If Microsoft really wants to help the worlds admins and businesses in general, it has to start with the people that support how business gets done. If they can really do that, I might just become a believer again. Until then though, I'll hold onto my doubts since thats about all I can afford.

  • laurie forti
    8 years ago
    Feb 26, 2004

    "... ideas about how Microsoft can improve relations ..."

    M$, and its customer-victims, could reap untold benefits IF and WHEN it starts to respect its customers as intelligent human beings. How many times have we heard the story that White Hat Hackers find a flaw, inform M$ privately in good conscience, and are simply ignored for months, thus causing public disclosure of the exploit to FORCE M$ to write a patch? This is the boundless arrogance and lack of corporate responsibility that M$ demonstrates on a continuing basis. M$ has created the whole spam/virus/Trojan/Worm/DoS thing by selling the world buggy software and willfully failing to fix it.

    One effective technique for improving relations would be to actually RELATE, as opposed to ignore. A simple, inexpensive way to do this would be for M$ to run a newsgroup for EACH software product and actively solicit bug reports and suggestions for improving the functionality of its bugware; and then, squash the bugs and improve the software's functionality.

    Too simple for a megabillion dollar company and tens of thousands of engineers to think of??

  • Olalekan
    8 years ago
    Feb 25, 2004

    First I want to say that it sounds like a good idea, but how far and wide is this initiative going to span.I hope its not just in the U.S, because don't forget that a lot of administrators are outside the U.S, and have limited exposure to 1st hand info. Decisions(sometimes wrong ones) are made through a lot of web related research. These could have been eliminated through the proposed channels.
    Well, whatever is being considered should involve easily accesible channels to be set up between admins and Microsoft (and not necesarily email), especially for those of us outside the US.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.