Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 05, 2007 12:00 AM

The 'Duh' Starts Now: Weighing In on the Vista Launch

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #95096
Rating: (29)

With the tagline "The Wow Starts Now," it seems like the Windows Vista launch was almost designed to be ridiculed. After all, how could the Vista launch measure up to Microsoft's famous Windows 95 launch?

The answer, of course, is that it can't, and analysts are already beginning to criticize Microsoft's Vista launch and marketing efforts. I suppose it all comes down to how you measure such things. In 1995, only a small percentage of people had computers and those who had even heard of the Internet were accessing it via a pokey dial-up connection that squealed in your ear if you inadvertently picked up the telephone receiver while you were downloading your email. In other words, Microsoft was able to position Win95 much more broadly back then because moving to Win95 was a monumental improvement for virtually everyone.

However, times have changed. Many people in developed nations own or use PCs, and the capabilities of OSs have improved dramatically over the years. The Internet is common and typically accessed via fat broadband pipes. Heck, it's even common for consumers in North America, Asia, and Western Europe to access Internet sites and services via their cell phones.

What else has changed? When Win95 was launched, few retail stores sold the OS, so long lines at midnight madness launch events gave the system a more exciting send-off with more people showing up per store. This year, 39,000 retailers in the United States alone stocked Vista the day it was launched, making for shorter lines and shorter waits. And of course, most people who buy Vista retail packages will do so from online retailers such as Amazon.com, which, incidentally, reported exceptionally high demand for the product. Unfortunately, images of people clicking "Buy Now" in a Web browser don't make for exciting news reports.

But what about compared with the recent video game launches such as those for the Sony PlayStation 3 and Nintendo Wii, you say? Those drew strong crowds of people waiting outside of retail stores overnight. Surely, Vista was a dud compared to those products. Not at all: The PlayStation 3 and Wii were in very short supply, whereas Microsoft pumped the retail channel full of Vista. It will never be hard to find or purchase Vista; consumers can easily walk into a Best Buy today and purchase the Vista version they want. There was no need to run out into the cold January night when you could order (or preorder) Vista from the comfort of your couch. Heck, you can even download Vista from Windows Marketplace if you want.

But let's bring a bit of reality back to the equation for those of you who are still worried that Vista is going to chug along with slow sales and disappointing returns. Even in its most conservative public estimates, Microsoft said it expects to sell more than 100 million copies of Vista by the end of 2007 and more than 200 million copies by the end of 2008. Frankly, the numbers will probably be quite a bit better than that, considering that more than 200 million PCs will be sold each year.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said that the company expects to sell more than five times as many copies of Vista in the next three months as it did during the same time period after the Win95 launch. Yes, the market is bigger today, Ballmer admitted, but part of the reason is the excitement for the product, which was five years in the making. To put it simply, Vista was a blockbuster waiting to happen. The fact that few people lined up outside stores the night of the launch says more about the maturity of the market than it does about Vista's performance.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Joe
    5 years ago
    Feb 12, 2007

    depends on the system.

    some systems will support 8GB of RAM because they tap into 64-bit addressing. 32-bit addressing systems support a maximum of 4GB. this is not dependant entirely on what the CPU can do, but is dependant on the memory controller, which may have tighter restrictions than the CPU.

    the most common reason why a typical system can't address a full 4GB of RAM is because the 32-bit memory controller has reserved address space for your video card between the 3.5 to 4GB of memory addresses, which will mean that physical RAM mapped to the same address space won't be seen by the system. this is common for most video chipsets and is not related to the OS, sorry. blame your chipset maker for not supporting 64-bit addresses, even if your CPU platform supports it.

    most Intel server platforms don't have this restriction because the video addresses are WAAAAAY up high in the 64-bit realm, even for server chipsets that only support 8GB of RAM. this is because all current Intel server chipsets are designed for 64-bit server computing.

    to avoid the problem, it's safest to buy a desktop motherboard that supports a maximum of 8GB of RAM. that's a sure sign that it does 64-bit addressing. video address space is almost always in the last xxxMB segment of address space that the chipset supports. sometimes chipsets will still limit the amount of installable RAM even if the address space is much larger. often this is a synthetic limitation because of what current technology will permit.

    XP

  • R2
    5 years ago
    Feb 09, 2007

    You know it seems to me that the memory hogging and so on with Vista should be unneccessary. There are always tricks, but what in the world is the problem there and why? I guess this is just one of the issues that stands out and doesn't really support the need to go with this system.

    Even more frustrating, I have the slots and specs available for 4 gigs of RAM....but if I remember my reading a week ago, Vista only supports and off number...something like 3.9 or something.......which makes adding impossible.......or am I misinformed? If not, what is with that......Waethorn......?????

  • Joe
    5 years ago
    Feb 07, 2007

    sorry that place is reserved for you and bonch. there's no room for a threesome. you guys have fun though. ;)

    XP

  • Lotsa
    5 years ago
    Feb 07, 2007

    "who shook the tree? the orc fell out."

    Well, "Waethorn", if you're worried about falling orcs landing on your head, you should get back under the bridge where you belong.

    ;-)

  • Will
    5 years ago
    Feb 06, 2007

    Well it's odd, now with the same stuff open after a few reboots, it's only using around 500-600... eerie...

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.