Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
May 30, 2001 12:00 AM

Microsoft 'Gets' Security

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #20938
Rating: (0)
Make sure that you do, too

If the spate of recent virus scares, Web-site break-ins, and other security violations has taught us anything, it's that the interconnected future will require a more open and responsible attitude toward security and privacy. Although naysayers (e.g., Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy, who last year uttered, "You gave up your privacy a long time ago. Get over it.") abound, securing our personal and corporate data is of first importance as we move into a .NET environment, and we need to plan accordingly.

What the Market Hears
For several years, a perception has persisted that Microsoft doesn't "get" security. The media, which delight in the release of each Microsoft Security Bulletin and Windows-related security miscue, have reinforced this perception. Since the rise of Linux, with its "more secure than NT" mantra, an awareness of security concerns has been growing. Microsoft has taken the brunt of the abuse directed at software makers, who users often perceive as being less than honest about security. As is often the case, the truth is far less damaging than the perception, but Microsoft knows that it must step up to the plate if only because it's the most visible and popular of targets.

What Microsoft Says
Microsoft's take on security and privacy protection is interesting. The company believes that the number one security problem is people, not technology or processes. This point is valid: You can have the right tools and security procedures in place, but human error will get you every time. Such was the case with Microsoft's network break-in last fall. An employee had left an administrator password blank. Retiring Chief Operating Officer (COO) Bob Herbold told a crowd at the University of Washington Business School, "It's not the technology, folks; it's the people. When we trace [such attacks] back, it's always human error."

What Microsoft Is Doing
Microsoft's answer for implementing security is Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000, which features an extensible architecture that lets third parties easily add features to the base platform. Extensibility now pervades Microsoft's product line, and this design choice is a good one. At the time ISA Server 2000 shipped, Microsoft listed more than 30 third-party software makers that were implementing add-ons for the product to provide content filtering, intrusion detection and blocking, and similar functions. You can add these features as you need them—you don't have to wait for ISA Server 2002.

Microsoft's Security team publishes its security bulletins through the company's Web site and email newsletters, but the team is trying to make the process of identifying and responding to security problems more formal and expedient. To provide its customers with better security services, Microsoft Security has begun the Microsoft Security Services Partner Program (MSSPP), which currently lists more than 40 partners in its community of consultants. MSSPP partners help corporations ensure that their systems are as secure as possible.

What You Can Do
Any business that implements Windows on the server can benefit from the security resources that many companies provide. For example, the Microsoft Security Web site at http://www.microsoft.com/security has links to the MSSPP, best practices guides, tools, and more. The Windows 2000 Magazine Network includes the Windows IT Security Web site at http://www.WindowsITsecurity.com. Take a look at ISA Server 2000 or other third-party firewall products to see whether they match your needs. Most important, train your employees to understand security and to work within the processes that make sense for your organization. In the end, the weak link will always be an individual, and only through communication, training, and education will you strengthen the chain. Even the most powerful software company in the world has learned this lesson the hard way.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Marcus Reid
    11 years ago
    Jun 12, 2001

    When it comes down to security, it's best to be uncompromising, so as not to be compromised. When it counts, it has to be OpenBSD. Nothing beats a philosophy of minimalism and aggresive proactive auditing. Short of unplugging the machine, it's the best security money can't buy.

  • richard
    11 years ago
    Jun 07, 2001

    "People" will always be a factor in security, I don't think anyone argues that point. However, I'm not willing to allow Microsoft to use that as a crutch for pushing out code that has contained, at times, very serious security holes that should have otherwise caused them to be embarrassed, if they could only get past their arrogance that is. There have been times in the past year when I've half-jokingly referred to the MS Security Alerts as spam because there have been so many of them. How is an IS organization that is already overworked, without taking MS patch maintenance into consideration, supposed to keep up with this onslaught of patches when they have hundreds and even thousands of Windows platforms to manage? It seems even Microsoft themselves aren't able to keep up with this task considering the number of different MS owned and managed web sites that have been compromised over the past few months. The reality is, most IS organizations can not keep up with this task and I'm guessing that's one reason why the recent sadmind/IIS worm, having compromised +/- 10,000 Windows servers, was so successful. And let's not forget that on too many occassions installing MS patches have... a) broken something else, b) introduced new problems, c) fixed only part of the vulnerability. There may even be a "d) all of the above" in there, but I'm not going to take the time research it. And yes, there are third-party products available, some quite expensive, that can make some sanity of the process of managing patch levels of a Windows server. That someone's business plan convinced investors there was money to made, probably not just in the short term, and that these products exist and are now upgraded to support Win2000 is telling. But, why should we be paying for a solution to this problem? Microsoft is responsible for introducing this problem insofar as a seemingly endless stream of "patches" are required (i.e. not "configuration" issues) and they have thus far lacked the leadership to tackle the matter head-on. It is Microsoft who needs to provide their customers with a decent, cost-effective tool for managing patches. Better yet, Microsoft should put more thought into security upfront in an attempt to avoid vulnerabilities such as those in MS01-026, which is not just a cumlative patch by the way. Microsoft "Gets" security? I don't think so - not yet anyway.

  • Scott
    11 years ago
    Jun 05, 2001

    The only thing the author discusses is Microsofts reaction ability to security vulnerabiities. I agree the biggest security risk is people misconfiguring software. However, until recently NT shipped misconfigured for security. MS claims to take security seriously and I hope they do. It will take more than words to prove their sincerity.



    When I'm asked if someone should use ISA point out 2 things: 1) ISA is better than having nothing and 2) ISA is the first security product from a vendor not known for security. Eventually I think MS will create a good security product - they have a knack for eventually creating very useful products. Until that time and after all the security mistakes and miscues MS has made why should I expect anything different. Sounds like the definition to insanity to me.

  • Doug Wilson
    11 years ago
    Jun 01, 2001

    I assume this article was written before the major IIS5 security hole was discovered? I was reading that even Steve Ballmer was completely confused as to why this one wasn't caught in testing. I am not saying MS is any better or worse than Sun or any other OS vendor, but MS has a long way to go before Microsoft 'Gets' Security sounds believable.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.