Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

June 12, 2007 12:00 AM

Google Details its Vista Complaint

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #96276
Rating: (4)

Faced with the public revelation of a previous complaint it had made privately to the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Google on Monday began providing some details. Previously, the company had issued a 49-page written complaint to the DOJ, alleging that the instant search feature in Windows Vista made Google's desktop search product run poorly.

"The search boxes built throughout Vista are hard-wired to Microsoft's own desktop search product, with no way for users to choose an alternate provider," a Google spokesperson said Monday. This, and the fact that Microsoft makes it too difficult for users to turn off Vista's built-in search, Google says, is a violation of Microsoft's 2002 antitrust consent decree.

Remember, however, that Microsoft publicly detailed its plans for desktop search in Windows Vista before Google even shipped a desktop search product of its own. And while a variety of companies, including Apple, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and others shipped their own desktop search add-on products in the interim, Vista's integrated search was well established by 2003, and the shipping version is truly an integrated part of the OS and notably doesn't contain any hooks to Microsoft's online services. It is, in other words, just part of the OS. Google's desktop search product, meanwhile, works like its dominant online search service and provides numerous links to Google's online services.

"If we were creating a feature in Windows and somehow requiring people to jump from our feature to our Internet search, then I could at least understand an antitrust argument being raised," said Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith.

Microsoft complains that it has already made "dozens" of changes to Vista in order to appease competitors and antitrust regulators from around the world. "We don't believe there are any compliance concerns with desktop search," a Microsoft spokesperson said Monday. "We've also told officials we are committed to going the extra mile to resolve this issue."

Attorney generals from several states are investigating the matter and are apparently giving some weight to the Google complaint. Separately, Microsoft faces a regularly-scheduled compliance hearing on June 26, and it's likely that the newly-revealed Google complaint will be among the topics discussed there.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Joe
    5 years ago
    Jun 14, 2007

    "I suppose Microsoft is also violating antitrust violation by creating an in-house windowing API, thus crippling Sun's Java Swing API"

    um....didn't Microsoft and Sun settle long ago and do the cross-patent agreement dealy?

    XP

  • Will
    5 years ago
    Jun 12, 2007

    Ammending Vista's integrated search to allow Google's service to be put in place is not only a security risk and new attack vector, but also will undoubtedly hinder performance.

    Filesystem searching has been a fundamental portion of operating systems since the 1970's and has exploited performance enhancements through kernel integration since the 1980's. Microsoft including their own indexed search system in a modern operating system is expected by users, it is not some featureset forced upon them.

    This claim by Google reeks of the boy who cried wolf and is beyond foolish.

    I suppose Microsoft is also violating antitrust violation by creating an in-house windowing API, thus crippling Sun's Java Swing API by not offering users a way to insert this alternative rendering method in place of MS's.

  • Lotsa
    5 years ago
    Jun 12, 2007

    "Vista's integrated search was well established by 2003, and the shipping version is truly an integrated part of the OS and notably doesn't contain any hooks to Microsoft's online services. It is, in other words, just part of the OS."

    EXACTLY. Which is why Google's claim is baseless. I think they're counting on technological illiteracy to validate their claim. Good analysis, Paul.

  • PatriotB6007
    5 years ago
    Jun 12, 2007

    attorney*s* general, Paul, not attorney generals :-p

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.