Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
August 17, 2005 12:00 AM

Microsoft: Worm Attack is Your Fault

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #47449
Rating: (6)

Rival hackers have unleashed competing computer worms on the Internet which are designed to exploit recently revealed flaws in various versions of Microsoft's Windows operating systems. The worms are most notable for their arrival speed: They are quickly spreading around the globe less than a week after Microsoft announced the flaws they exploit. Microsoft, however, remains surprisingly unimpressed by the fact that its customers are being forced to take their PC systems offline.

"We are not aware at this time of a new attack," the company noted in a statement it issued last night. "Instead our analysis has revealed that the reported worms are different variations of the existing attack called Zotob. Microsoft has reviewed the situation and continues to rate the issue as a low threat for customers."

This statement bears little comfort for companies such as ABC, Caterpillar Company, CNN, Daimler Chrysler, The Financial Times, Kraft Foods, The New York Times, The San Francisco International Airport, SBC Communications, United Parcel Service (UPS), and Walt Disney, all of which suffered from computer crashes, downtime, and repeated reboots because of the worm attacks. According to reports, there are at least six separate worms that exploit Microsoft's recently-revealed flaws. David Maynor, a security researcher at Internet Security Systems in Atlanta told The New York Times that the hackers responsible were essentially involved in a "turf war" to control computers in the largest networks around the world.

Despite Microsoft's "low threat" assertions, security firms are rating this attack being more severe. Trend Micro is using the "medium" designation to describe the attack, while Symantec grades the Zotob attacks as a 3 on a 1 to 5 scale.

But back to Microsoft, which you'd think would be reaching out to customers and not explaining how they'd be fine if they simply upgraded to XP or installed patches the day they were released. "Zotob has thus far had a low rate of infection," the aforementioned statement continues. "Zotob only targets Windows 2000. Customers running other versions such as Windows XP, or customers who have applied the MS05-039 update to Windows 2000 are not impacted by this attack."

Only Windows 2000, eh? According to AssetMatrix, Windows 2000 is the most-often used Windows version in medium- and large-sized corporations, edging out XP 48 percent to 37 percent. Put another way, roughly half of all Windows installs in corporations are Windows 2000.

So we have an interesting situation. Hackers are now able to exploit Windows flaws within days, and when they do so, corporations are admonished by Microsoft. No offense to the world's largest software company, but that's no way to talk to customers.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 22, 2005

    "Monthly hmm.. who's the genius who figured out there's between 3- 5 Tuesdays in a month..

    If it were monthly they'd call it by a NUMBER, to correspond with a date that only comes around once a month (i know.. amazing) like,... Thurrott's Third of the Month or something"

    Heh, someone either hasn't ever owned an agenda or just didn't do well with math but whatever the case "Patch Tuesday" (a monthly event) has NOTHING to do with the number of tuesdays in a month. The point is that the patch is released once a month which varies maximally by 3 days (28 to 31 days), leading to 12 releases per year, regardless of which day they're released on.

    You can't release by dates (or NUMBERS as you call them) for two reasons: 1. Companies work on 5-day weeks, making a fixed day of the week for release easier considering the advantage of fixed planning and 2. Every date eventually lands on a weekend.

    Actually, if you manage to surf your Mac away from WindowsIT Pro (where you're apparantly getting real work done) you'll find that almost every company and organization that has monthly events works with numbered week days rather than dates.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 22, 2005

    Strange to see that the Maccies see the "auto-networking feature" as a benefit - I would have thought that was more of a security risk in most organisations...

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 22, 2005

    Of the 15k machines under 1000 were classified as medium to high risk. We could do this assesment quickly as we have full hardware and software audits of each system - we know what we've got and where.

    A test on our standard machine image took around 60 minues to perform rudimentary testing. The overwhelming majority of PC's run standard software. These we could patch immediately. Any that failed after patching could be re-imaged.

    F&P servers were slightly higher risk. So to prevent major issues we broke the mirror on the OS drives (OS only on a mirrored pair of disks, data Raid 5). So if the patch broke a server, we'd just put the other disk back in and leave the mirror broken until further action could be taken.

    Likewise with the more demanding servers (exchange, SQL etc). The mirror's or clusters were broken and patches applied.

    We had no issues on servers and only a few issues on some desktops.

    The only trojan issue we had were a few 'off net' laptops brought into the office. However the network is configured to alert on suspicious traffic so these machines we're quickly identified and isolated.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 22, 2005

    "The worms are most notable for their arrival speed"

    No, they're most notable because of the damage they do to an insecure operating system.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Aug 22, 2005

    I hear Linux is better than Windows, yet here I am on my Windows XP Professional

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.