Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
June 13, 2001 12:00 AM

BAT vs. CMD

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #21110
Rating: (0)

I work in a mixed Windows 2000, Windows NT, and Windows 9x environment. I often build batch files that work properly only under Win2K and NT because the files either call utilities that run only under those OSs or use shell functions that don't exist in Win9x. If a batch file contains portions that don't work under Win9x, running the batch file on Win9x systems can be disastrous.

To prevent problems, when I write batch files that contain no portions that will fail under Win9x, I name the file with a .bat extension, which will run under any Windows version. If I use features that only Win2K and NT support, I name the file with a .cmd extension. Win2K and NT recognize .cmd files as executable and will run them. Win9x doesn't recognize .cmd as an executable file type: If you attempt to run a file with a .cmd extension under Win9x, the OS simply reports a Bad command or file name error message, and no damage is done.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
    There are no comments to display. Be the first one!
You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.