Beware of superficial qualifications
Professional computer certification programs have been around for a long time, but none has been as successful as Novell's Certified NetWare Engineer (CNE) program or the Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE) program. Novell and Microsoft created these programs to provide an additional revenue stream for themselves and for third-party companies offering training aids and services. This motivation doesn't mean these programs aren't good, and it doesn't mean the companies' original intent--to provide a certification process that gives computer professionals recognition for their skills--was a poor one.
I first ran into a problem with certification programs about 7 years ago when I was hiring the staff for a computer-testing lab. At that time, Microsoft
certification programs didn't exist, and Novell's CNE program had been around
for only a couple years. The lab's classified advertisements for these staff
positions asked for candidates with a 4-year degree or related computer
experience. Many applicants for these networking team positions were CNEs.
After interviewing a half dozen promising candidates, I discovered that
they all had attended Novell training and had worked on classroom networks, but
had no real-world experience. Not that this lack of experience was necessarily
bad. All the candidates qualified for entry-level tech positions. However, none
of the candidates had applied for entry-level positions, nor did they have what
I call the inference engine. That is, not one of the candidates could
draw on the information they had learned in the classroom and apply it in an
unfamiliar situation. The candidates were able to answer the questions we asked
them or perform the tasks we gave them on our test network--as long as the
candidates had covered the questions or tasks in their class work.
I don't mean that every CNE on the planet fell into this category; I knew
quite a few who didn't. But I had the misfortune of getting lots of applicants
from local computer training schools that promised students they could "be
a CNE in 8 weeks; no experience necessary." And I'm pretty sure these
applicants weren't the cream of the crop.
I talked to people from Novell about the quality of the CNEs these
certification mills were turning out. They listened with great concern, but
didn't think they could prevent the existence of such programs. And because
businesses were beginning to require CNE training as the price of admission to
job interviews, I doubt Novell felt compelled to make any serious changes.
When Microsoft introduced its certification programs, the company really
raised the bar compared to the CNE training. Microsoft's program required a
higher level of knowledge, offered more intense training, and gave more
difficult tests. But the same thing that happened to the CNE program is starting
to happen to the MCSE program. As businesses have begun to require MCSE training
(in some cases, certification is the only requirement), certification training
has become an industry that has spawned dozens of third-party products designed
to teach the novice the information necessary to pass the tests. Given the depth
of knowledge necessary to pass the tests, the availability of training products
seems like a good thing.
The problem is that a noticeable percentage of the MCSE certification
test questions have three answers: the right answer, the wrong answer, and the
Microsoft answer. An experienced computer professional usually knows the right answer, but also understands the testing process well
enough to know the Microsoft answer. The result is that people who have received
MCSE training, but don't have experience to back it up, get shortchanged. These
people learn how to answer the test questions but don't learn a nonbiased answer
or develop the skills to apply the knowledge they've been force-fed. They never
realize that MCSE training prepares them for a life in a Microsoft product
environment.
I'm starting to see more and more people with the letters MCSE after their
name who are less than qualified to be certified systems engineers. I subscribe
to seven active NT mailing lists that cover topics ranging from general NT
information to hardcore NT development. Over the past 6 months, I've noticed a
disturbing trend on these lists: People with the letters MCSE in their .sig
files have been asking very basic computer questions. And the trend is not
limited to two or three people--at least 10 to 20 people on almost every
list ask questions that anyone with a year or two of on-the-job experience can
answer.