Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
October 08, 1999 12:00 AM

Another View on MCSE Certification Track Changes

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #7318
Rating: (0)

No doubt many of you are reeling from the news that you must jump into the world of Windows 2000 (Win2K) if you want to maintain your MCSE certification—news that Microsoft handed down in its new Win2K certification track (http://www.microsoft.com/mcp/certstep/mcse.htm#w2k). Because many of you may be new to the world of Microsoft certification, a brief history lesson might help to explain why we were caught flatfooted by this recent announcement.

Let me start by saying that the new Win2K track contains no real surprises for MCSEs satisfying certification requirements with Windows NT 3.5x exams. Over a year ago, Microsoft warned us that that NT 3.5x MCSEs would lose their certification if they didn't "pass a replacement exam within one year of the retirement date. Replacement exams include MCSE core exams from either the Windows NT 4.0 track or the Windows NT 5.0 track (Windows NT 5.0 exams are in development)"(http://www.pctech2000.com/ retired.htm).

A month ago, I had a canned answer for students wondering when they would have to recertify if their MCSE certifications were based on NT 4.0 exams. When asked, I would say, "If Microsoft follows its existing pattern, you won't have to recertify until about a year after the company releases exams for the network OS that will replace Windows 2000." How wrong I was. History, for Microsoft, doesn't repeat itself.

I pride myself in my ability to understand complex matters, including the development of college programs that lead to degrees. As a college professor, this understanding is especially important. I have studied the new Win2K track, and I can tell you that it's not easy to digest or understand. In essence, Microsoft is providing two primary tracks. The first track is for those who have already passed the exams 70-73: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0, 70-67: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, and 90-68: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 in the Enterprise. The other track is for candidates who haven't passed these exams.

The good news (if you can call it that) for those who have taken the three NT 4.0 exams is that Microsoft is offering you the privilege of taking one exam that covers the information contained in the four core exams for Win2K MCSE certification. You must exercise this privilege sometime between the date Microsoft releases this all-in-one exam and December 31, 2001. Microsoft makes no mention of the cost of this all-in-one exam, but if its cost is the same as for the other individual exams, there's obvious benefit in going this route. If it costs more, you might want to take the four exams separately so you can concentrate on specific areas.

Another core requirement is that you take an additional exam from a choice of three (this requirement and the electives requirements apply to both certification tracks). The three choices are exam 70-219: Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Directory Services Infrastructure, 70-220: Designing Security for a Microsoft Windows 2000 Network, and 70-221: Designing a Microsoft Windows 2000 Network Infrastructure.

As with the NT 4.0 track, those seeking Win2K MCSE certification must take two elective exams. The current list of Win2K elective exams includes the three exams I mentioned earlier (70-219, 70-220, and 70-221) plus Upgrading from Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 to Microsoft Windows 2000 (70-222). Additionally, the list of elective exams includes "any MCSE electives current (not scheduled for retirement) when the Windows 2000 exams listed above are released in their live versions."

The exams that apparently won’t qualify as electives because of retirement include:

  • 70-73: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0
  • 70-67: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0
  • 90-68: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 in the Enterprise
  • 70-58: Networking Essentials
  • 70-21: Microsoft SQL Server 4.2 Database Implementation
  • 70-22: Microsoft SQL Server 4.2 Database Administration for Microsoft Windows NT
  • 70-42: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 3.51
  • 70-43: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows NT Server 3.51
  • 70-53: Internetworking Microsoft TCP/IP on Microsoft Windows NT (3.5-3.51)
  • 70-77: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Internet Information Server 3.0 and Microsoft Index Server 1.1

Exams that might not qualify because they're not included as "electives" in the Window NT 4.0 MCSE track include:

  • 70-64: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows 95
  • 70-98: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Windows 98

Those that apparently still qualify but are suspect in my opinion because they're "MCSE electives current (not scheduled for retirement) when the Windows 2000 exams listed above are released in their live versions" include:

  • Internetworking Microsoft TCP/IP on Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 (70-59)
  • 70-59: Implementing a Database Design on Microsoft SQL Server 6
  • 70-26: System Administration of Microsoft SQL Server 6.5
  • 70-18: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Systems Management Server 1.2
  • 70-13: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft SNA Server 3.0
  • 70-78: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Proxy Server 1.0
  • 70-76: Implementing and Supporting Microsoft Exchange Server 5

With all this in mind, there are a couple of critical dates you must remember. For NT 3.5x MCSEs, your death is scheduled for June 30, 2001. For NT 4.0 MCSEs, it looks you have a stay of execution until December 31, 2001.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Gary Witt
    12 years ago
    Jan 15, 2000

    Your article states TCP/IP (exam #70-059) is NOT scheduled for retirement. I looked at Microsoft's web site dealing with certifications last night (1/13/00) and test #70-059 is scheduled for retirement. This is very confusing for people who are planning their certification tracks and want to take electives that will be valid in the Win2000 track.

    Can anyone clarify this discrepancy?

    Thanks.

  • Ken Dewar
    13 years ago
    Nov 29, 1999

    Recently, I attended a Sun Solaris Fundamentals course at Sun Canada. As an MCSE NT 4.0, I was shocked to discover how much of NT's architecture, and design derives from Unix 5 (Solaris is just a version, like BSD, AIX, etc.) Microsoft innovative? Come on. It's just subset of Unix 5. I credit my MCSE training for helping me understand the concepts easily. Unix is wonderful; it is incredibly exciting to see how much control, that you, as a Sys Admin, have over your environment, right down to device drivers. Yes, you need some basic programming skills, I began to realize, for the first time, how proprietary NT really is. I realized the next step for me, is not handing $$ to M$ for re-certification as an apostle for their less-functioned Unix clone called NT, but rather, to start to learn a whole new, open world called Unix. Sun Solaris is the future, in my opinion now, and I am not going to spend my evenings 're-certifying' in Win2K. I am very sorry I got mixed up with M$. They just want the money. Plain and simple greed. Anyway, since most networks are heterogenous, shouldn't we be learning other systems, not just NT? Just how much spare time does M$ think we have to spend, let alone the money?

  • Kevin
    13 years ago
    Oct 15, 1999

    I agree with some of the other opinions posted about this article:

    1) good information but
    2) how does this move by M$ strike you?
    3) How might this effect the value of the certification(s)

    I've heard that the harder the certification and fewer people holding it, the more valuable it would be (like a degree from Stanford or MIT means more than a degree from NosePick Community College.

    It seems like the new certification track for Win2K will be harder and more detailed (I remember reading something about security being a whole test or section of a test, etc.) which will mean having the qualification will carry more weight. Not fun when studying maybe, but reallly the best for the industry, employers and employees.

    I got my MCSE last week, but feel there will be enough businesses out there not yet migrated from NT4 for a few years yet. I hear there are businesses out there still hapily running NT3.5 so surely NT4 will hang around til bugs are worked out of Win2K and industry confidence is gained. Not every company has the money to completely rip out their old systems and install new ones with enough 'umph to run Win2K immediately.

    I come from a Unix back-ground and my comments about the certification process is that it DOES mean I come away with a lot more learned than if I just sat through a class with a meaningless certification at the end. The exam process keeps the concentration and raises the bar--definitely.
    But after about a year at this M$ stuff, and trying to keep an open mind, I'm not really convinced that I want to spend my career supporting M$ products and chasing 'round behind Bill's World Domination Machine. ooopss. just lost my objectivity again....

    Anyway, the way M$ expired the NT stuff so fast, (fine to retire the 3.5 stuff, but surely it's logical to carry on recognizing the operation one iteration ago) it just made me think they're pushing the IT pro's into Win2K to help push the market and IT directors into Win2K to make more money quicker. Capitalism is all about making money, but surely it is possible to be a little TOO single-minded about it. I think I'll just go back to Unix....

    kevin

  • Paul De Vocht
    13 years ago
    Oct 12, 1999

    And suppose there is another track, called "Sensible Corporate I.T. Decisions". As NT4.0 will remain in the corporate environments for at least 2 to 3 years, a shortage of qualified ( sometimes certified) NT4.0 specialists will encourage many system engineers to remain or become uncertified NT4 specialists. Proudly they will hold the title "ex-MCSE but not a marketing tool". Microsoft, aware of the loss of all these cheap marketing instruments, will try to sink NT4 by stopping all support. But who cares, we can all become certified Sun Solaris S.E.'s.

  • Gary Prescott
    13 years ago
    Oct 11, 1999

    well,i'm going to be taking my a+ in january and then onto networking and the msce come march,and hopefully will be finished in october. will i have to upgrade right away at exta expense and time or will the 4 designation be good enough for the workplace? not a great time to change gears.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.