Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 02, 2005 12:00 AM

Microsoft Disputes Claim of Flaw in XP SP2

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #45296
Rating: (4)

Late last week, a Russian security company called Positive Technologies claimed that it had discovered two minor "mistakes" in Microsoft's implementation of a security feature in Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) that could allow hackers to sidestep the feature. The announcement was widely reported at the time as a major security flaw in XP SP2. However, Microsoft this week says that there is no vulnerability because the method described by Positive Technologies cannot be used to let a hacker run malicious code on a user's system.

"Customers are not at risk from the situation," a Microsoft statement reads. "There is no attack that utilizes this [method]." Furthermore, Microsoft says that the security feature in question, called Data Execution Protection (DEP), was designed only to prevent errant code from overwriting memory, preventing a common type of flaw called a buffer overrun. Even if a hacker were able to somehow bypass DEP, the company says, that wouldn't be enough to compromise the system.

Positive Technologies first reported the flaw to Microsoft in late December 2004, but decided to go public with the information after the software company refused to categorize it as a vulnerability. That doesn't mean that Microsoft won't fix the flaw, however. Microsoft representatives say the company will modify DEP and other SP2 features over time as needed, and will examine ways to seal off the bypass methods discovered by Positive.

After Microsoft denounced Positive's claims, Positive CTO Yury Maksimov acknowledged that the DEP vulnerability wasn't enough to open up users to an attack, but noted his frustration with Microsoft's inability to deal with the issue. "Such a vulnerability cannot cause a new worm or virus (to appear)," he wrote in an email to CNET. "But it is much better to know about the problem, than not."

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Stephen
    7 years ago
    Feb 07, 2005

    In related news, Paul Thurrot is just honest - some people do not like that - tough.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Feb 07, 2005

    In related news, Paul Thurrott is NOT BIAS at all.
    [wink wink]

  • Stephen
    7 years ago
    Feb 04, 2005

    The errata list for the RedHat system is longer than my arm. People who don't know any better assume 'few viruses written against to date' translates into 'secure'. It does not. Linux wouldn't fair as well as Windows in the heat of a coordinated onslaught.

    You can run Windows relatively securely if you turn on patching and use a bit of sense. Linux, on the other hand, is unproven. The future of Linux code is more of the same buffer-overrun C, the future of Windows code is managed code which precludes the buffer overrrun altogether and is much more secure.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Feb 03, 2005

    "Using Microsoft software, period, is a security problem. It doesn't matter what version or what patches you have, there will always be some hole waiting to be exploited. "

    Translated: I don't understand all the big words Mike used, so I will just criticize Microsoft.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Feb 03, 2005

    I think you meant to say "Using software, period, is a security issue.

    Apple releases quarterly updates to their OS that contain numerous security fixes every time. Linux distros update continuously and there is an average of about one security fix per week.

    Simple user behaviors can keep you secure no matter what OS/Software you are running. Assuming that only Windows is insecure and anything but Windows means security (in other words, hiding your head in the sand) is exactly NOT the way to remain secure on Mac, Linux or any other OS.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.