Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

March 31, 2009 12:00 AM

Conficker: World Preps for April Fools Attack

What to do about this twisted worm?
Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #101796
Rating: (6)

Six long years ago, the SQL Slammer worm began its inglorious travels across the Internet, infecting machines whose owners had neglected to install a patch that had been issued by Microsoft six months earlier. Since that time, Microsoft has dramatically overhauled the way it integrates security into its products and provides security updates to customers. But it's amazing how history repeats itself. This week, on Wednesday, April 1, another computer worm, this one targeting numerous modern Windows versions, will trigger an attack of some sort on the world, ushering in what I'm sure will be a new generation of security changes around the industry.

The worm, dubbed Conficker (a German melding of "configure" and an obscene phrase), has security experts looking about as confused and useless as so-called economic experts in the face of the current financial crisis. It's really a series of worms, all variants of the same code base, which have been released over time. Estimates place the number of PCs and servers compromised so far at about 10 million machines in over 150 different countries (with 3 million in China alone). The worm is scheduled to do ... something ... on April 1.

Here's the thing: As with SQL Slammer, Conficker exploits a vulnerability that has already been patched by Microsoft. In fact, it was patched last October as part of Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067 (see URL below). But according to security experts, up to 30 percent of all Windows machines worldwide are still not protected against this vulnerability. (It was around 50 percent at the end of 2008.) And as with SQL Slammer, Conficker's origins lie in previously-created proof-of-concept code, in this case an open-source penetration-testing tool.

Conficker is serious stuff, especially the latest "C" variant. It infects unpatched computers, spreads via network shares and removable storage as well as its own peer-to-peer functionality, then shuts down the computer's ability to download and install legitimate security patches. But the scariest part is that Conficker C is going to trigger, well, something -- on April 1.

On that date, 500 of an estimated 50,000 domains will be contacted by infected machines and given some kind of instruction. It could be an updated version of the worm, other malware, or something else entirely. No one is sure. One thing all security researchers agree on is that Conficker is sophisticated. This isn't some weekend-hacker-kiddie project. Instead, its authors have utilized encryption keys and other advanced techniques that have continually baffled those trying to uncover its secrets.

On the good news front, it's looking less and less like Conficker is going to trigger a massive Denial of Service (DoS) attack on April 1, as was previously feared. In fact, many security watchers now expect the day to pass as quietly as did January 1, 2000, when the world's computers were supposedly going to rise up and battle the humans for supremacy of the earth. (Or something to that effect. I have trouble remembering what all the hubbub was about.)

Part of the positive vibe here is that security researchers have discovered what they believe to be a small flaw in the most recent Conficker version, a rarity given the high quality of the code. This flaw will help administrators recognize Conficker-exploited PCs, something that wasn't previously possible. (Before, PCs afflicted with Conficker appeared to be properly patched.)

And Microsoft has issued a $250,000 bounty to anyone who can provide information that leads to the capture of the person or people responsible for Conficker. So far, there aren't many clues, but law enforcement agencies have suggested the Ukraine as a possible origin. One thing is clear, whoever is responsible for this worm is a criminal mastermind worthy of a James Bond thriller.

The obvious question, of course, is what you should do. Security experts from Microsoft and the major security firms say that the smartest thing you can do is stay up to date with your security updates. The company's Malicious Software Removal Tool can help remove Conficker, as can the Windows Live OneCare Safety Scanner, a free online service. For more information, visit Microsoft’s website and check out Security Bulletin MS08-067.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Duncan
    3 years ago
    Apr 01, 2009

    Mr PeyloW, they say ignorance is bliss, well I'll bet you're very happy in your belief that you're system is safe. If you ever do feel like spoiling your mood however, just do a search for security vulnerability on the software of your choice...

  • Richard
    3 years ago
    Apr 01, 2009

    Mr PeyloW if you truly believe that only Windows computers are the ones to get a virus or worm you are ignoring history. Linux, MACs and other UNIX variants have all been at the mercy of worms and viruses in the past. I will agree that Windows computers get most of the attacks but that is because it is the biggest target. If the MAC was biggest it would get the most attacks. The volume of attacks are all based on market share. The crooks will attack who will give the greastest return on effort spent.

  • BRAD
    3 years ago
    Apr 01, 2009

    C'mon Paul. You should be above sensationalism. Don't add to the mass panic and misinformation.

  • Fredrik
    3 years ago
    Apr 01, 2009

    Why do everybody keep on talking about "computer viruses"? When the only kind of computers that are ever effected in a harmful way is computers running Microsoft Windows.

    No one would think of blaming all cars and all car manufacturers, for the faults of a single manufacturer, or a single model.

    Keeping the public unaware, of the simple fact that Windows abstinence is the currently only practical way to stay safe, is unethical and almost borderline criminal.

  • Jim
    3 years ago
    Apr 01, 2009

    Good information. To the point and simple to understand.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.