Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 21, 2012 11:43 AM

Microsoft: Google Bypassed IE Privacy Settings Too

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #142317
Rating: (17)

It looks like Google's secretive efforts to bypass the privacy settings in Apple's Safari aren't limited to just that browser. Now Microsoft says that Google has similarly bypassed the privacy settings in Internet Explorer (IE). And Google, rather than denying the claim, says instead that it didn't have much of a choice.

Settle in, folks. This one is going to get messy.

Google, as you might remember, was accused recently of bypassing privacy features in Apple's Safari web browser, which runs in the company's popular iPhone handset and also, in much more limited numbers, on PC and Mac desktops. Google owned up to the invasion and halted the practice. But now the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is investigating, and the online giant has already been slapped with a class-action lawsuit.

This is, of course, where Microsoft enters the picture.

"We've discovered that Google is employing similar methods [to its Safari hack] to get around the default privacy protections in Internet Explorer and track IE users with cookies," Microsoft Corporate Vice President Dean Hachamovitch writes in a blog post explaining Google's latest privacy invasion. "We've found that Google bypasses the P3P Privacy Protection feature in IE. [But] Internet Explorer 9 has an additional privacy feature called Tracking Protection which is not susceptible to this type of bypass. Microsoft recommends that customers who want to protect themselves from Google's bypass of P3P Privacy Protection use Internet Explorer 9 and add a Tracking Protection List."

According to Hachamovitch, in both Safari and IE, Google is essentially fooling the browser to believe that "third-party cookies," which are basically used to track user movements online, are "first-party cookies," which can only be associated with the currently viewed website. Most browsers, including Safari and IE, block third-party cookies by default, but not first-party cookies.

But IE offers a workaround to this behavior by allowing third-party cookies that have a valid P3P Compact Policy Statement, explaining how the site will use the cookie and states that the site won't track the user. Google abused this P3P policy to fool IE into accepting third-party cookies that allow Google to track users online.

"Given this real-world behavior, we are investigating what additional changes to make to our products," Hachamovitch added. "Privacy advocates involved in the original specification have recently suggested that IE ignore the specification and block cookies with unrecognized tokens. We are actively investigating that course of action."

Google says, however, that the P3P policy used by Microsoft is outdated and not conducive to "modern web functionality." And it points to a Facebook support page that notes that "most modern web browsers do not fully support P3P." But Google is utilizing what is essentially a bug in IE's handling of P3P policy to track users without their permission. Apparently the theory is that if others are doing it, it must be OK.

If you are an IE 9 user and would like to prevent Google from tracking your activities online without your consent, please visit Microsoft's Tracking Protection Lists site for more information and a tracking protection list download.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • infiniteloop
    3 months ago
    Feb 23, 2012

    Re: 'Kicking competitor butt'.

    You mean like Microsoft are doing with Bing, Windows Phone and Zune?

    The only 'butt' Microsoft are kicking is their own.

  • mikegno
    3 months ago
    Feb 22, 2012

    The only problem here for MSFT was that it didn't turn on Tracking Protection by default and tell people to download a Tracking Protection List when they first install IE9. Contrary to what fanbois who don't know any better think, it is very effective, unlike what's put into Safari.

    My guess is that MSFT did not turn on tracking protection by default because they were afraid of another anti-trust complaint since the good tracking protection lists basically kill google's business model. (Another advantage to it imho.)
    BTW, I recommend the Fanboy list. It's the same one used in Adblock Plus on Firefox.
    Now MSFT, has the perfect excuse to turn tracking protection on by default and hit Google where it hurts. I hope it returns to the agressive MSFT of old and kicks some competitor butt..

  • infiniteloop
    3 months ago
    Feb 22, 2012

    Has anyone been to WalMart recently?

    Tayme seems to have gone missing.

    Just wondered if anyone had seen him.

  • infiniteloop
    3 months ago
    Feb 22, 2012

    @jkohut:

    Except that this won't put Microsoft out of business.
    Unlike when Microsoft did the dirty on some of those companies you mention.

  • jkohut
    3 months ago
    Feb 22, 2012

    Now Microsoft knows how Novell, WordPerfect, Mozilla, Lotus, etc... felt for all those years when Microsoft would do things behind the scenes that would break functionality "accidentally" or take advantage of hidden features in their products. Should be a lesson for ALL of these companies to learn to play nice with each other. Not sure that they have all learned their lessons yet.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.