Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

May 27, 2010 02:11 AM

Poised to Overtake Microsoft, Apple Faces Regulatory Scrutiny

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #125319
Rating: (126)

Fourteen years ago, Apple was teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, just months away from running out of cash and, more important, in danger of becoming irrelevant. Today, the company is a technology juggernaut thanks to modern products like iTunes, iPod, and iPhone, and will soon overtake Microsoft from a market cap perspective. But with this market power comes closer regulatory scrutiny. And this week it was revealed that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has been quietly examining Apple's digital music market tactics, looking for antitrust abuses.

The DOJ inquiry, thus far, has involved interviewing key players in the music industry and Internet music markets. The agency is particularly interested in Apple's bullying of record companies: Apple has apparently punished various companies that provided rival Amazon.com with temporary music exclusives for its "MP3 Daily Deal." This punishment involves dropping all marketing efforts for those labels and artists on the dominant iTunes Store, Apple's online music service.

It's a serious issue: While iTunes represents less than 27 percent of all music sold today, it is the dominant online music store, representing about 70 percent of all music sold electronically. Amazon.com is a distant number two with just 8 percent market share.

The DOJ inquiry isn't the only regulatory scrutiny Apple faces. Separately, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is examining Apple's rules requiring developers to use only Apple tools if they wish to sell iPhone applications through Apple's online store. (The only legal way to distribute such apps to individuals.) Apple suddenly changed that rule when Adobe released a cross platform tool that would have enabled developers to more easily create iPhone apps.

Apple is also part of a wider probe into tech industry hiring practices. This probe involves Google, Intel, IBM, and other companies.

That Apple faces potential antitrust action now is not coincidental. While many still prefer to think of the company as a tiny upstart trying to change the world, Apple is in fact a gigantic, successful corporation. Long removed from flirting with bankruptcy, Apple is now a company to be feared, and it has proven far more ruthless, in many ways, than competitors like Microsoft and Google. Indeed, according to at least one financial measure, Apple is poised to surpass Microsoft as soon as this week.

That measure, market capitalization, or market cap, involves calculating the value of a corporation by multiplying its share price times the number of outstanding shares. Market cap is considered a "public consensus" of a company's worth because it focuses almost solely on the stock price, which isn't necessarily indicative of the overall worth of the business.

But boy, does it have Apple fanatics excited. This week, both Apple and Microsoft are worth about $220 billion from a market cap perspective, behind the biggest company on earth (again, from a market cap perspective), Exxon Mobile, which is worth $280 billion. (As a comparison, Google's market cap is "only" $151.43 billion.) But while Apple has been on an upwards trajectory for years, Microsoft has fallen, and big time.

The issue here, of course, is excitement. Apple makes big bets on new products, dropping old ones very quickly, and in effect behaving like a technology startup. Microsoft, meanwhile, is slow and plodding, because it serves far more customers and needs to ensure stability. One company offers shock and awe, and Wall Street responds. The other has a loyal customer base of over one billion users, and Wall Street yawns.

By various other measures, Microsoft continues to outperform Apple. It had higher revenues ($58.4 billion vs. $42.9 billion) last year, and much, much higher profits. (Microsoft's $14.6 billion in profits this past year are almost three times as high as Apple's $5.7 billion.) Microsoft has much more cash and cash-like assets on hand as well, $39.7 billion, vs. Apple's $23.1 billion. And Microsoft has continued to dominate Apple in its original, core market of PC sales. After years of high profile efforts and failed ad campaigns, the Mac still accounts for less than 4 percent of PC sales worldwide.

15 years ago, when Apple was slowly slipping away into irrelevance, Microsoft was seen as the tech industry bully, and it was becoming distracted by increasing antitrust scrutiny of its own. Indeed, Microsoft's antitrust troubles only very recently came to a close, not just in the US but in the EU and elsewhere. Today, the tech industry is, in many ways, very different. Microsoft is still huge and powerful, but it finds itself challenged not so much by small, web-based companies, like many expected, but rather by huge, powerful companies—Apple and Google—that don't behave like huge, powerful companies.

This new dynamic presents an interesting competitive landscape in which Microsoft is no longer the only tech superpower. And while this may be exciting, mostly to the Apple crazies, it's actually good news for all technology users. Microsoft does its best work when pressed by strong competitive challenges, and it has never faced stronger competitors than Apple or Google. No matter which company's products you prefer—I suspect for many people, it's actually a mix of all three—this epic battle will ultimately have just one winner: You.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • The Real ChuckD
    2 years ago
    May 28, 2010

    <What the do you call .NET Framework? The original Xbox was the first console system to come with it's own internal hard drive. Also, the original Xbox was the first to allow ripping from standard CD's & using those songs in the game. The original Xbox was also the first console to use Dolby Interactive Content-Encoding Technology. Xbox Live? The Zune Player features wireless syncing. If you take off your Mac-issued distortion glasses, you'll find plenty of innovation.>

    Right. The MBA was the first laptop to be made entirely out of one piece, the MBP were the first laptops to run Core2Duo, the Macs were the first support 802.11n AND Bluetooth 2.0 EDR. And the list goes on.

    And all you have is a hard disk drive in an XBox, the total and utter failure of the gaming industry which costs Microsoft a least a few billions per year just to be in the gaming market?

    And now tell me: what goes is wireless syncing if the next Zune is at least 100 miles away (give or take a few miles)? Given Zune's marketshare, this is not a joke. You'd sooner find an Aids-free hooker in Nigeria than another person using a Zune.

    And right now, Microsoft Apologists should make a choice: should Apple marketshare be ridiculed (Paul frequently does this) or not (as he argues in the post above)?

    The selective argumenting you apologists throw into debates is laughable.

  • 2 years ago
    May 27, 2010

    The squabble over the iPad is meaningless when it comes to this article. The real issue is Apple's anti-competitive tactics that have lead to not one, not two, but three legal investigations. Two of them anti-trust cases. The same Mac fanboys like Chuck D still defending the indefensible. Bring up bogus arguments about what has Microsoft has innovated. Really?

    What the do you call .NET Framework? The original Xbox was the first console system to come with it's own internal hard drive. Also, the original Xbox was the first to allow ripping from standard CD's & using those songs in the game. The original Xbox was also the first console to use Dolby Interactive Content-Encoding Technology. Xbox Live? The Zune Player features wireless syncing. If you take off your Mac-issued distortion glasses, you'll find plenty of innovation.

    Back to the real issue, antitrust. Over a decade, Mac fanboy's have ridiculed & railed against Microsoft abuses. Now Apple acts exactly the same as Microsoft. Maybe worse. Bullying the music industry to kill Amazon's Daily Deal? Acting like an industry bully? Just like Microsoft. Using only proprietary compilers while banning third party compilers? Harming competition, JUST LIKE MICROSOFT. The vaunted hatred of DRM? Look at the iBookstore & what do you find? DRM. Apple refuses to sell books in the iBookstore without DRM. How many times have I heard that Windows has bloat thanks to DRM? What do you call the iBookstore's DRM?

    It's getting harder to tell the difference when Steve Jobs & Phil Schiller act more like Bill Gates & Steve Ballmer. Apple has become Big Brother. Forget the Borg. Apple has become the Empire. Like the Republic became an Empire, Apple strayed from it's origins. A tragedy indeed. AS Vic Gundotra said in his keynote, If Google did not act we faced a draconian future. A future where one man, one company, one device, one carrier would be our only choice. Thats a future we dont want.

  • Vandeley
    2 years ago
    May 27, 2010

    The innovation of the iPad is as much the conception behind the device as it is the technology that supports the conception. The thing with Apple is that they have been building toward this device for years, bringing out precursors in, say, touch interaction like the Magic Mouse and multi touch track pads over years. The iPad is not a big iPhone but rather the iPhone was probably a shrunken prototype iPad.

    The conception is merely to remove one more abstract layer between intent and realization with data. What I mean is, say you want to zoom in on a picture. On a desktop pc you might have to drag a slider with a cursor by moving a mouse but on the iPad you merely stretch the picture with your fingers. Multi touch allows for a more intuitive GUI. The more we can act with data as if it is real objects, the more intuitive it becomes. (I think this is why a stylus is seen as superfluous by Jobs.) A Windows 7 tablet shoehorns touch but does not begin with it as a base conception.

  • --tayme
    2 years ago
    May 27, 2010

    @Weir - My last post describes where I am going with that question. Yes, Apple has been very innovative - just not with this device. Yes, it is going to sell well, there is no denying that. You are trying to paint me as anti-Apple, and that will not work. If you've read Paul's stuff for very long, you know the opposite to be true. Enjoy your day!

  • Klimecki
    2 years ago
    May 27, 2010

    @ tayme:

    Easy. It's called OSX. On Macs, Phones, and Tablet.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.