Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

July 22, 2010 08:28 AM

Microsoft Issues Automated Workaround for Windows Shortcut Vulnerability

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #125643
Rating: (38)

Microsoft this week released an automated online tool to counter a recently-revealed zero-day vulnerability in the Windows shell. This vulnerability affects all modern Windows versions from Windows XP through 7, including Server versions, and will almost certainly be exploited by hackers before a formal fix is rolled out via Windows Update.

"Microsoft is investigating reports of limited, targeted attacks exploiting a vulnerability in Windows Shell, a component of Microsoft Windows," the company notes in a security advisory. "The vulnerability exists because Windows incorrectly parses shortcuts in such a way that malicious code may be executed when the icon of a specially crafted shortcut is displayed. This vulnerability can be exploited locally through a malicious USB drive, or remotely via network shares and WebDAV. An exploit can also be included in specific document types that support embedded shortcuts."

The vulnerability in question was first revealed by security researchers about a month ago. The first was likely VirusBlokAda, an anti-virus company based in Belarus, which reported on the flaw on June 17. Last week, Microsoft confirmed the findings and provided information about the vulnerability and some workarounds.

This week, the software giant issued an automated FixIt tool on its support web site. Using this tool, users can apply a workaround that changes all Windows shortcut icons–including those in the Start Menu and taskbar–into plain white icons that all look the same. This isn't ideal from a usability standpoint, of course, but it will prevent any exploits. An actual fix is expected in the weeks ahead, possibly by August 10, when the software giant delivers its next regularly-schedule set of security patches. My guess is that Microsoft will try to patch this flaw earlier rather than later, due to increased chatter about impending attacks.

While few Windows users are going to be thrilled with Microsoft's workaround, the vulnerability is in fact pretty serious. In order to exploit the flaw, hackers would simply need to distribute a Windows shortcut (*.lnk) that has been specially written to deliver malware. If the user just views a folder with this shortcut file inside, their PC could be compromised, Microsoft says.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Klimecki
    2 years ago
    Jul 24, 2010

    @Golcher:

    Not quite.

    Beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. The problem I have with Dell, Lenovo, HP, et al. is that their products all look the same. If they weren't badged, you'd be very hard pressed to know who designed and made them. They have little or no personality to help distinguish between them. It doesn't help either, that they all use the same OS.
    Apple's products could only be designed and made by Apple. They are instantly recognisable, as the design language they employ is unique to them. Apple knock - offs never quite live up to the original. Look at the many iPhone wannabe's, iPod derivatives, etc. Even Windows Vista and Win 7 are highly derivative of OSX.
    Whilst you might think Lenovo laptops are nicely designed,they are designed mostly down to a price and then have to run Windows, and therein lies the main issue.

  • Golcher
    2 years ago
    Jul 24, 2010

    subzerohitman721:

    Regarding looks, I disagree. Beauty and aesthetics lead to delight. People take pride in beauty. A painting serves no purpose hanging on your wall excepto to create aesthetic pleasure.

    Macs in general are beautiful machines, I would not question that. But Apple does not have a monopoly on beauty, clearly. They've released some God ugly products (LCIII, PowerBook G3, iBook), but in general they're gorgeous.

    Now, as I said, Apple does not have a monopoly on beauty. I'm sure Klimecki will agree that Lenovo, por example, produces laptops with a standard, beautiful industrialist design that communicates efficiency, reliability, and seriousness. They're clearly work machines and communicate that with beauty, sobriety and seriousness.

  • Klimecki
    2 years ago
    Jul 24, 2010

    @subzerohitman:
    Phew where to start.

    "Exterior design really serves no useful purpose"

    That statement just tells me that you don't understand what design is. Every man made object has been designed. In the case of the MacBook Pro for example, its aluminium unibody shell makes it light, extremely rigid, tough and allows for a thinner profile by removing the need for internal fixings. It is also very recyclable. It's beauty comes from it's clean lines and unembellished form along with the fact that it gives the product all those extra benefits.
    It's an electronic device by the way, not mechanical, although looking at the way some competing computers are designed, I can understand your mistake.

    "Windows is far more upscale-able as an OS with greater hardware and software capabilities than the Macintosh will ever be. Period."

    That statement compares an operating system to a computer system. The fact that you can run Windows on a MacIntosh as well as all the software written for OSX means your claim is void.

    "Looks are irrelevant"

    Is that what you'd tell your wife/ significant other?

    Fancy that. A security company making such claims. What really matters are exploited flaws. Witness this weeks Microsoft scramble to again patch theirs.

  • subzerohitman721
    2 years ago
    Jul 23, 2010

    Klimecki,

    Exterior design really serves no useful purpose. It's a narcissistic metric that doesn't enhance the computer's ability. It's a computer! Not a work of art! It's a mechanical device to enable human beings to create, manage, access, & automate tasks.

    Why do people put up with Windows?

    Windows is far more upscale-able as an OS with greater hardware & software capabilities than the Macintosh ever will be. Period. I can all kinds of hardware to extend the functionality of Windows. You can't even get a Mac with Blu-Ray writer or support! Blu-Ray's high capacity storage makes pretty good backup solution. Real world forensic science, medical, & dentistry software? All Windows. No Mac versions.

    IT management of multiple network stations, Windows totally blows away the Macintosh. From managing an individual computer to an entire business complex full of PC's, Windows IT software has nuances that's as artistic as any Mac. Apple has neither invested the money or the software engineers to match what Microsoft has done. This is where Microsoft has won historically against the Macintosh.

    Your arguments are perfect reason why Windows had dominated the Macintosh for 17 years. Looks are IRRELEVANT! As the world has decided for 17 years, functionality beats form. I need multiple USB ports! I could careless for Johnny Ives design. iPhone 4 proves Ives was wrong. I need multiple modern PCI slots, the iMac doesn't support that. As a former musician, I know plenty about art & music. Artwork on a horn totally changes its pitch & usefulness.

    Speaking of Mac security, Secunia has shattered the myth that Macs are safe.

    http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2010/07/apple-the-new-world-leader-in-software-insecurity.ars

    Apple has displaced Oracle as the company with the most security vulnerabilities in its software, according to security company Secunia. Over the first half of 2010, Apple had more reported flaws than any other vendor. Microsoft retains its third-place spot.

  • Klimecki
    2 years ago
    Jul 23, 2010

    @Golcher:
    All Apple products that have been designed with Jonny Ive's input have a generic design aesthetic whose roots date back to the Bauhaus school of design in Germany in the 1920's. This design school had a massive impact on design in general in the 20th Century. It's influence is still very much with us today. The aesthetic of the Bauhaus speaks about the purity of form, free from embellishments and unnecessary additions, forms that speak about their function. The German company Braun also used this design language, and when Sony made great products, back in the 60's 70's and 80's they employed the language to fine effect too.
    Today, I admire the way Apple have taken this a stage further, using this Modernist approach to combine beautiful forms with gorgeous materials, and innovating with new methods of manufacture. The unibody MacBook Pro's are a great example, as is the high tech glass used in the iPhone 4 and the incredible attention to detail exhibited in every product.
    Some companies come close to achieving a similar ultra high standard of product design, for example BMW - hence the comparisons between the companies, but nobody absolutely nails the design of products that speak about their time quite as successfully as Apple.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.