Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
August 10, 2010 02:24 AM

Google, Verizon Reach Deal on Net Neutrality

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #125763
Rating: (30)

As expected, online giants Google and Verizon issued a joint proposal on net neutrality that completely bypasses recent proposals by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Under terms of the proposed deal, most traditional internet traffic will be treated equally, as the FCC and net neutrality proponents wish. But Internet traffic from cellular and upcoming broadband networks would be exempted, allowing Google to pay for preferential treatment on Verizon's networks. It's exactly the nightmare scenario net neutrality proponents feared.

Naturally, that's not how Google and Verizon are presenting their "vision."

"We've been working with Verizon to find common ground on the issue of net neutrality for nearly a year," Google Blog Editor Karen Wickre noted in a post. "We hope today's proposal, a suggested legislative framework for consideration by lawmakers, helps to advance the debate over open Internet rules in Washington. We also believe that it is best for users and for the web."

The proposed deal would prevent content producers from paying broadband Internet providers for a special "fast lane" that would give them a better connection with their users, creating a two-tiered Internet of have's and have-not's. But it does splice up the Internet in exactly this fashion for cellular data networks—which will most likely be the most common Internet access worldwide in the future—and for upcoming broadband network services for "health care, ... advanced educational services, or new entertainment and gaming options."

Critics say those last two exceptions are, in effect, loopholes that will allow Google and other deep-pocketed companies to get preferential treatment with the most lucrative internet-based services of the future.

Google and Verizon say the exceptions are necessary because the growth of cellular internet could be slowed otherwise. And those new broadband services would "have to be distinguishable from traditional broadband Internet access services and are not designed to circumvent the rules." Furthermore, Google says it has no plans to develop those kinds of services. (Google does make the world's most popular smartphone system, Android.)

The FCC has already spoken out against this proposal.

"Some will claim this announcement moves the discussion forward," FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps said. "It is time to move a decision forward, a decision to reassert FCC authority over broadband telecommunications, to guarantee an open Internet now and forever, and to put the interests of consumers in front of the interests of giant corporations."

In a previous statement, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said, "Any deal that doesn't preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet for consumers and entrepreneurs will be unacceptable."

Exactly so.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • O
    2 years ago
    Aug 12, 2010

    "Google is not a nice company for me anymore."

    What, they were nice to begin with? Seriously? They make *all* their money on mining your data for marketing garbage. In my book, marketers are pretty much fungible with lawyers -- the two most disrespected professions I can imagine.

    People hate all the credit bureaus, as if they were the devil. But hey, that Google is a stand-up crowd of people... The founders own a 767 based entirely on farming your browsing habits and selling ads. That's probably the world's most excessive corporate jet. Buying Air Force One from the government (if it ever came on the market) would probably be the only way to top their prior insanity.

    If I had to take a wild guess, I'd figure Google knows hundreds of times more about all of us than a credit bureau ever will.

  • S
    2 years ago
    Aug 12, 2010

    I really like how all the people who cheered google to dominate everything are now scrambling to find justification for google's entry into the "evil" club.

    Hey geniuses what did you think would happen? You make and cheer google to control everything and now that google is showing it's true colors you protest it?

    You go suckered in. Google killed the internet the day it started spamming it with ads. Google is now creating the schmidternet where they rule. The schmidternet wants to be in your tv, in your phone, in your social netork, in your email, in your docs, in your streets. everywhere....to serve you adds and expecting you to shut up like the good consumer they want you to be.

    Funny how the less evil company today is Microsoft ha ha. take that googlers. Enjoy getting spammed with google adds in everytying you do.

  • programmer
    2 years ago
    Aug 11, 2010

    Google is not a nice company for me anymore.

  • Jones
    2 years ago
    Aug 10, 2010

    As regular readers will know, Paul and I rarely agree, but he is spot on with this one.

    "Under terms of the proposed deal, most traditional internet traffic will be treated equally, as the FCC and Net Neutrality proponents wish. But internet traffic from cellular and upcoming broadband networks would be exempted"

    What patent nonsense.

    The fastest growth in internet traffic is wireless. Of COURSE it has to be subject to the same net neutrality rules as the rest of the internet. What on Earth does the physical means of transmission have to do with the rules governing equal access to this vital resource? Of yes, of course, it makes perfect sense if you look at the business interests of Verizon---and Google seems to be quite willing to go along.

    So much for "Don't be evil".

    I'd suggest writing in to the public comment section at the FCC. They need to hear from people on this one.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.