Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

March 03, 2010 03:25 PM

Apple Launches Attack on Google's Android

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103659
Rating: (29)

Apple this week launched a proxy attack on Google's Android smart phone OS, by accusing handset maker HTC of violating 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone. HTC makes a number of popular smart phones, including the popular Nexus One, which is based on Google Android.

"We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it," Apple CEO Steve Jobs said. "We've decided to do something about it. We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."

That's quite a statement coming from the man who orchestrated the theft of Xerox's GUI for the Mac and then sued Microsoft for doing the same. That case, from the early days of the desktop PC era, was eventually settled. But HTC, unlike Microsoft, doesn't have a mountain of cash and overwhelming market share to fall back on. Fortunately, it has some wealthy and influential friends of its own.

"We are not a party to this lawsuit," a Google representative said. "However, we stand behind our Android operating system and the partners who have helped us to develop it."

HTC also has an inconvenient truth on its side: It's highly likely that many of Apple's iPhone-related patents are invalid due to prior art. Apple certainly didn't invent multi-touch technologies, for example, though it's acting like it did. And while Apple was wise to start with a relatively small company like AT&T, if it's going to protect its patents--and thus open them up to legal challenge--it's going to have to eventually confront the industry heavyweights that are also using these technologies. And that means not just Google, but Microsoft.

Microsoft, in fact, has been using multi-touch for years--its multi-touch Surface device dates to 2001--though it only recently added the technology to its phones. But Microsoft's not alone. According to Wikipedia, multi-touch (and even pressure sensitive) technology has been used on computing devices as long ago as 1982. Pinching motions date to 1991. (And if it's in Wikipedia, it must be true, right?)

HTC says it's going to fight Apple's suit. "HTC is a mobile technology innovator," the company wrote in a filing. "[We] also hold a large number of patents." HTC said that the Apple suit poses no short term threat to its business.

So why is Apple suing? Clearly, Apple is feeling the competitive heat, with Google's Android systems growing much faster than the iPhone and catching up to (and in many cases surpassing) Apple's devices in terms of performance, capabilities, and ease of use. And surely at least a few of Apple's patents will hold up in court. But regardless, the company is likely betting that the ensuing legal drama will take a lot of time and scare off some of the smaller potential customers.

Apple can use that time to shore up its still considerable market share while developing a coming generation of iPhones and related devices. And if the past is any indication, that new generation of devices will be interesting, exciting and innovative. And, of course, heavily protected by patents.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • M
    2 years ago
    Mar 10, 2010

    Maybe Apple is chapped because Android is open source and is being ported to many other phone platforms. But at the same time, the HTC Sense UI is similar to iPhone and Android and runs on Windows Mobile - which means it can run on a load of different phones and can be used with a number of different cell phone carriers. Long story short, HTC gives users choice and savings - Apple doesn't.

  • Greg
    2 years ago
    Mar 04, 2010

    I just want to say Paul is one of the good people out there. I just don't understand the vitriol. Listen to Windows weekly and get an appreciation of his general good-guyness. Paul loves Apple products but hates their fans, which I can understand.

    Anyway, back to the post. Seems like people know a rip-off when they see it, kind of like pornography. Using Windows in the early 90's made me feel dirty. It was so shameless. I get the same feeling with the Nexus One. Yes Apple stole the basic idea from Xerox, but the 2 systems were very different. The implementation of Apple technology was significantly different, or so I've been told.

    I'm not a fan of taking legal action, but I sympathize with Apple. It's not really fair to lose a second war. Given the success MS has had selling Apple technology, I can understand their point.

    Hopefully the patent office rewards innovation more than the copyright office does.

  • 2 years ago
    Mar 04, 2010

    Info Dave:

    Apple paid to see limited information on the GUI. Apple didn't get the rights to the Alto, Smalltalk, or the WYSIWYG, mouse-driven GUI interface. In 1980, Bill Gates did the same thing.

    http://www.virtualaltair.com/virtualaltair.com/mits0028.asp

    http://www.mac-history.net/the-history-of-the-apple-macintosh/rich-neighbour-with-open-doors-apple-and-xerox-parc

    Both acknowledge that Bill Gates & Microsoft went to Xerox Parc in the 1980's & saw everything that Apple did. While Steve paid for the sessions, Bill Gates did it for free by invite.

    As for the lawsuit, this is a dangerous game of chicken Apple is playing. If the patents are found to be invalid by prior art, which I suspect is what is going to happen, Apple will lose the keys to the kingdom again.

    Didn't Apple learn from Apple vs Microsoft that they can't patent everything? You can patent an actual invention; not an innovation. Touch has existed since the mid 1960's. The original patents for touch belonging to Dr. Sam Hurst of Elo Touchsystems, Apple is just innovating features that Dr. Sam Hurst invented. I believe Apple's innovations aren't worthy of a true patent.

    I'm sure HTC will site the 1972 US Supreme Court case Gottschalk v. Benson. The United States Supreme Court ruled that a patent for a process should not be allowed if it would "wholly pre-empt the mathematical formula and in practical effect would be a patent on the algorithm itself", adding that "it is said that the decision precludes a patent for any program servicing a computer. We do not so hold."

    Multi-touch technology began in 1982, when the University of Toronto's Input Research Group developed the first human-input multi-touch system. The system used a frosted-glass panel with a camera placed behind the glass.

    A breakthrough occurred in 1991, when Pierre Wellner published a paper on his multi-touch Digital Desk, which supported multi-finger and pinching motions.

    Plenty of prior art usage of at least 20 years.

  • Lotsa
    2 years ago
    Mar 04, 2010

    It's not an ATTACK. It's a DEFENSE.

    My God, Paul, you are totally off the rails when it comes to Apple, aren't you? When you looked in the mirror before writing this post, which of your two faces did you see?

  • Dr. Gary
    2 years ago
    Mar 04, 2010

    Just when you think Paul cannot get any lower with his 'these-are-facts-but-actually-aren't-because-I-am-too-dumb-to-read-up', he does it again.

    See comments above: I won't reiterate his lies.

    Mr. Selective Argument, Microsoft-apologist and allround Microsoft-nutjob is at it again. Laughable. And a bit sad, too.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.