Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

March 30, 2010 10:23 AM

The Enduring Value of Microsoft Office

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #104702
Rating: (61)

I was intrigued to see an article in The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Monday describing the "challenge" that Microsoft Office faces from Google's free tools. I don't believe that Google's free tools—Google Apps, which includes Google Docs—represent a technical or financial challenge to Office at all, so I was curious to see whether I had missed something.

If you read the article, you'll discover a lot of speculation and little actual meat. It states that Google Apps "performs similar tasks to Office," which is like saying that a horse and buggy performs similar tasks to a Cessna. The WSJ reports that Google Apps has "gathered steam" in recent years and its users benefit from "reduced costs and administrative hassles" (which I assume means "reduced costs and fewer administrative hassles," but whatever).

Apparently, larger businesses are using the "specter" of Google Apps as a bargaining chip, negotiating lower prices on Office and related Microsoft tools. This actually seems like a good scam if you can maintain a poker face. Meanwhile, Google has netted a total of 25 million Apps users. The downside? Only 1 million of them are paying for the supported version. The WSJ does accurately note that most of Google's successes against Microsoft solutions have come via its Gmail email solution (also part of Apps).

And that, presumably, is the point of the article: Not that Google has actually stolen customers away from Microsoft (yet), but that small businesses (and individuals) are choosing Google's webmail solution in ever-increasing numbers and that this inroad might lead to a Google run on Microsoft's Office business.

Folks, this isn't going to happen.

For all of the hoo-hah recently about cloud computing (I'm a convert to the hosted services cause by the way) certain realities intrude on this utopian vision of the future. And they have nothing to do with obvious complaints around availability and uptime, offline use, or even familiarity with Office. No, there's a very simple reason that Office will remain very popular for years to come, continue to dominate the productivity market and, as a result, supply a very healthy portion of Microsoft's revenues on an ongoing basis. The reason is that Microsoft Office is vastly superior to every single office-productivity solution there is. As a result, customers continue to use it and, on their own schedules, upgrade to the latest versions. And when Microsoft is prepared to offer a fully hosted online version of the suite, its customers will follow them to the cloud as well.

Microsoft won't be offering a fully hosted online version of Office this year. Instead, Microsoft is offering a pretty tepid bit of Office-related functionality in its Office Web Applications. It's providing subsets of the capabilities of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote via your web browser. These online versions of some Office applications aren't as full-featured as one has to believe is possible. But I think this speaks to the lack of desperation on Microsoft's part. That Google challenge, such as it is, has apparently done little to erode Office's popularity. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that most Google Apps users still use some version of Office as well. (Come on, let's be realistic here. Google Docs is terrible.)

Microsoft's domination over a market in which there is supposedly competition came about the old fashioned way, which isn't necessarily typical for the software giant. That is, Microsoft developed the best solution. Over the years, we've seen hapless competitors like WordPerfect, Lotus SmartSuite, and others fall by the wayside. Today, a free Office clone named OpenOffice.org is a software time machine, providing a way to install a free version of what looks like Office 95 if you like torturing yourself and aren't interested in compatibility, functionality, or support. (I'm surprised it's not more popular. Ahem.)

The funny thing is, OpenOffice.org makes Google Docs look bad by comparison. So we have three levels of functionality here: Tier A is Microsoft Office, tier B is all the Office clones, and tier C is Google Docs. And even this assessment is being overly kind to Google Docs. It's that bad.

There's little doubt that Google is Microsoft's biggest competitor and as the online giant moves ever more aggressively into Microsoft territory, it needs to be watched and responded to appropriately. Microsoft's decision to simply release a new version of its Office productivity suite alongside a very small subset of online-based solutions and the usual roundup of server products speaks volumes to the quality of the competition that Microsoft sees in this space right now. In the future, that might change. But today, we're in the same place we've been for 15 years. There's Office. And then there's everything else.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Ovares
    2 years ago
    Apr 02, 2010

    Paul,

    I'm gald to see that you earn a confortable living around Microsoft products, but I can't help but wonder if you are a bit too close to the stuff you write about.

    Talking about "little actual meat" this post screams fanboy from top to bottom. The only thing missing from this article is "google sucks" or something to that effect.

    And before some other poster tries to rip my head off, I use Office and Google Docs all the time. I dont believe any piece of software or service to be the end all or be all.

  • Sever
    2 years ago
    Apr 01, 2010

    Well, for all educators out there. There is a program called Live@EDU (get.liveatedu.com) where Microsoft is securing FREE platform for educational institutions for email service based on Live Exchange. Every student/teacher gets 10 GB of mailbox aqnd all Live services for free (over 30 GB per user for storing data), and also Office Live Apps to use. :)
    Do not see the value of using Google! But this is just me.

  • Bergstein
    2 years ago
    Mar 31, 2010

    Paul, I've used Windows since the first version (yuck!) and Office's pieces forever. However, I think you are somewhat off here. My real world experience is that I'm using Office less and less, and Google more and more. Why? First because outside of the corporate bastions (which are falling right and left), I'm working more and more with SMB users who either don't want the complexity of Office, or don't need it. Also, I've found for simple work collaborating, Google docs, especially the spreadsheet, is quite nice. Real time collaborating with others on a doc is a no brainer! While I agree that, for example, Excel's data functions are spectacular (however they have not brought the Mac version up to the same level, which is a real problem for getting me to use their product with clients), the fact is that many of the other simple uses are comparable. I just can't assume my collaborators know Office to the level I do. I also agree that I've yet to find anyone under 30 who actually *endorses* installing MS software...amazing, given that they usually don't even ask about the functionality needed, they just assume that google will get it done!

  • Getreu
    2 years ago
    Mar 31, 2010

    Paul,

    I would really like to believe you're right about MS correctly sizing up the threat from Google rather than just being late to the party as it was when the Internet exploded and MS was caught without a browser. Like some other folks that have made comments here, I work in a county school district as an IT consultant. Just yesterday, we discussed not replacing our application servers in the schools and moving all applications to the "cloud" and student/teacher data to Google Apps. We converted from I-Mail to G-Mail last summer. I personally dislike Google Apps, but I can't argue with 7GB of storage per staff member and student for free.

  • Vandervoort
    2 years ago
    Mar 31, 2010

    I'd be stunned if any of my SMB clients dropped Office in favor of Google Docs or any other lightweight products. Most people I know that try to go from Office to Works or Google Docs, thinking they don't need all the MS Office "bloat" and expense, quickly discover that there's what THEY consider to be a "basic" (because they've used it) feature missing in the low-end product that makes it a deal-breaker for them. Might be pivot-tables, might be thesaurus, might be macros, might be pattern-match search & replace...might be anything. Varies from person to person. "Advanced" features are merely the ones you haven't used.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.