Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
March 23, 2006 12:00 AM

With Vista Shifting, Microsoft Will Shake Up Windows Division

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #49766
Rating: (31)

According to numerous reports, Microsoft is getting ready to shake up the management team in its Windows Division and bring in Microsoft Office head Steve Sinofsky to put Windows back on track. As a Microsoft insider told me recently, the Windows Division is full of the last vestiges of "the bad, old Microsoft. This can't happen quickly enough."

The shakeup could happen as early as this week. Under the new plan, Sinofsky will allegedly take control of Windows development and report to Kevin Johnson, who oversees the Platform Products and Services division. Sinofsky has a well-respected track record of shipping products on time. He's also a close confidant of Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer, and is expected to focus largely on Vienna, the codename for the Windows version following Windows Vista, as Windows Vista is largely feature-complete and just needs to be fine-tuned for release.

A Wall Street Journal report about the management shakeup discusses the "old Microsoft" my source described, referring to the "Cowboy culture" of the Windows engineers. These people have been riding the Windows cash cow for years, but now Vista is crashing down around them after years of delays. This product was original scheduled for release in 2003.

Microsoft co-president Jim Allchin, who currently runs the Platform Products and Services division with Johnson, has already taken the biggest step in turning around the division. In 2004, he effectively shut down Vista development and started over from scratch after recognizing that the project was going nowhere fast. Sadly, Allchin will retire at the end of 2006 when Vista is finalized. The addition of Sinofsky should help the Windows division overcome his loss.

This isn't the first time a major Windows version threatened to derail. Microsoft performed a similar shakeup when Windows 2000 veered wildly off track in late 1998. At the time, the company brought in Brian Valentine, another shipment guru, to kick butts and get that product back on schedule. At the time, Valentine was well known for his work with Exchange Server.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • PatriotB6007
    6 years ago
    Mar 24, 2006

    Lotsamystuff, Windows 2000 and Windows Me were developed separately for completely separate audiences. Yes, Me was released chronologically after 2000. But that doesn't mean that it was a successor to 2000. For example, no one would have migrated from 2000 to Me--that would be a downgrade.

    Your original comment was about Brian Valentine, implying that his takeover of Windows 2000 resulted in Windows Me. My reply was that he had nothing to do with Me, that his first post-2000 deliverable was XP, and that he did a pretty good job getting XP out the door in time.

  • Shravan
    6 years ago
    Mar 24, 2006

    Most mac users dislike microsoft products, not because they're buggy or the UI sucks, but because they're made by Microsoft. The reasons they provide are just futile attempts to cover up their prejudice. I've used Office and Windows for years. Heck, I've done all my programming, documenting, etc. in Windows and haven't had 1/10th the problems these people claim to have had.

  • Al
    6 years ago
    Mar 24, 2006

    "It's a technology-pushing, industry-leading scheme. My OS is always kept modern and fresh and up to date. Yours was last released in 2001."

    And you pay $129 everytime. BTW My copy of XP Pro cost me $129 as it was an upgrade FanBoi, don't correct me when you don't know what you are talking about.

    Lets see OSX 10.0-10.4 hmmm, that has cost you $645 so far, for a skin on top on Unix. Hell that's real value for money isn't it boys.

    Oh and FanBoi, try Exchange, SQL Server, Sharepoint Server, Office, Windows 2003. Those are quality, enterprise level applications. Something that you and your picture drawing ilk can only dream of.

    Apple maker of a niche OS and overpriced Boomboxes

  • ki829
    6 years ago
    Mar 23, 2006

    Hey in the bright side, when/if Vista comes all our PCs would be old enough that we'll buy a new PC with Vista on it anyway.

    Ed bott at ZDnet is reprting that the windows division will be slit into 8 parts.

  • Shravan
    6 years ago
    Mar 23, 2006

    "I'm assuming you meant OS X there. Uh, no, all the tech press and IT admins claim the same as well. So do the security analysts."
    Yes. And that's why many of them use Windows.

    "More people know the lyrics to the latest crappy rap song than the theory of relativity."

    Well, more people know the theory of relativity than say, the simplex algorithm. Does that prove anything?

    "It's a technology-pushing, industry-leading scheme. My OS is always kept modern and fresh and up to date. Yours was last released in 2001."

    That's why we have service packs, don't we?

    "My god. Microsoft is dead."
    Hahahahaha.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.