Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
June 23, 2006 12:00 AM

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of June 26

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #53853
Rating: (31)

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news, including my post-TechEd blues, new monthly releases of Windows Vista, Holiday 2006 Vista promotions, Novell's final solution, VMWare v. Microsoft, Verizon v. Vonage, Google usage, and much more...

WinInfo Blog

Short Takes

- Windows Vista Back on the Monthly Release Bandwagon

- Microsoft Throws PC Makers, Customers a Vista Bone This Holiday

Season

- Novell Fires CEO, CFO

- Microsoft Announces Quarterly Dividend

- VMWare Wants Open Standards in VM Market

- Verizon Sues Vonage

- Most Microsoft Employees Use Google

- Microsoft Begins Testing of Windows Server 2003 SP2

- EU Still Waiting on Adobe's Vista Complaint

- New Tool Prevents Microsoft Spyware

- Just in Case You Were Still Wondering: Linux Isn't a Threat to

Windows Desktop

WinInfo Blog

by Paul Thurrott, thurrott@windowsitpro.com

My post-TechEd 2006 experience hasn't been the greatest. After six days of early mornings and late nights in Boston--and I'm not exactly the most graceful commuter--I came down with a bizarre cold/virus and at one point somewhat humorously ended up wearing a Michael Jackson-style paper mask in a doctor's office with a suspected case of the measles. I've been cleared of that, although my illness has been declared "mysterious" and I'm still suffering from it. Basically, it amounts to cold-like symptoms (a fever, stuffed-up nose, coughing, headache, general pain) along with a lovely rash and, more recently, a nice bit of peeling skin. Taken in context with my near-death experience in Colorado last year, I'm one more illness away from buying a permanent Hazmat suit. Long story short: It hasn't been the greatest week.

Which is too bad, because the beautiful weather we were graced with during TechEd is still here. If this is what global warming has in store for Boston, maybe we need to stop trying to prevent it. Relax: I'm kidding. Sort of.

Of course, being this sick makes it hard to get anything done, although I've been racking up some serious frequent flyer miles on Call of Duty 2 online, much to my wife's chagrin. Like me, she works at home, and although she appreciates that I'm sick and everything, I can tell from her overly subtle comments ("You play that game too much,") that's she's even more eager than I am for this bout of illness to be over. I'm not the greatest patient, I guess.

One thing I accomplished last week during a fit of feverish work was to migrate my family's Windows Media Center PC from Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 to Windows Vista Ultimate Beta 2. It's kind of been a disaster, with horrible performance issues and some serious bugs, but we're all going to suffer through it together as a family trust exercise. That is, they'll trust that Vista will only get better over time, and I'll trust that they won't try to kill me in my sleep. So far, so good.

Short Takes

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news

by Paul Thurrott, thurrott@windowsitpro.com

Windows Vista Back on the Monthly Release Bandwagon

Give Microsoft some credit: Even though Windows Vista has been delayed innumerable times and has suffered through some horrific growing pains, the company just keeps plugging away. Now that the lackluster Vista Beta 2 release is out the door, Microsoft intends to ship monthly Community Technology Preview (CTP) builds to testers, the first of which should appear any day now (the builds are in the 54xx build-number range). Meanwhile, consumers who signed up for the Windows Vista Customer Preview Program (CPP) and installed and activated Vista Beta 2 will be eligible to receive the Release Candidate 1 (RC1) version of Vista when it ships in August. The idea is to put the pre-release versions of Vista in front of as many eyeballs as possible during the time period where Microsoft is doing performance and fit-and-finish work. Hey, it can only get better.

 

Microsoft Throws PC Makers, Customers a Vista Bone This Holiday Season

With Microsoft not shipping Windows Vista to consumers until January 2007--or "early in the first quarter of 2007," as I'm suddenly hearing--one might expect the software giant to do something to alleviate any issues PC makers might have during the lackluster holiday 2006 selling season. Put simply, why would anyone buy a new PC in December 2006 if they know new models with a major new Windows version are coming out a month later? This week, Microsoft said it would offer consumers deals through PC makers that are designed to keep PC sales from faltering in November and December. There are very few details so far, but one might imagine the deal being a "buy an XP now and get Vista for free"-type promotion. On the other hand, upgrading a Windows XP PC to Vista isn't recommended: If you want the best experience, wait for Vista to be preinstalled on new PCs before taking the plunge. In fact, you might want to even wait for the second generation of Vista-based PCs.

 

Novell Fires CEO, CFO

Although there were changes at both Microsoft and Novell this week, the way in which those changes were meted out is somewhat dramatic. At Microsoft, company icon Bill Gates announced a graceful, Sun God-like "Plan de Retirement" during which he will continue to run the company while working less (which is no small feat). Meanwhile, Novell went for the Caesar and Brutus method: The company's board of directors voted Thursday to fire its CEO and CFO in a bid to jump-start its sales growth. I'm curious. How many years of stagnant growth and lack of success in new markets will Microsoft need before its board of directors wakes up?

 

Microsoft Announces Quarterly Dividend

And speaking of its board of directors, Microsoft announced this week that it will issue a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share this quarter. And I thought they weren't doing anything.

 

VMWare Wants Open Standards in VM Market

Last week, I spoke with VMWare CEO Diane Greene at TechEd. One of the most interesting themes she's pushing these days is the need for standardization in the virtualization market. VMWare, as you might know, is the leader in the standardized virtualization market by a wide margin, and its virtual machine (VM) format is already the standard. But with Microsoft now offering free virtualization products and threatening to include a virtualization layer in its server OSs in the near future, Greene has decided that it's time to talk. Interestingly enough, she's not involving lawyers, although I think she could make an excellent antitrust case. Instead, Greene would like to see standards bodies agree on various format standards for virtualized hardware, then see vendors such as VMWare and Microsoft use those formats in their own solutions. I'm kind of curious to see how this plays out. After all, why wouldn't Microsoft agree to this solution? More important, don't you just know they'd never agree to this?

 

Verizon Sues Vonage

As if Vonage didn't have enough to worry about, this week telephone giant Verizon sued the company for violating "at least" seven Verizon patents. Verizon launched the suit after examining technical documentation that Vonage supplied to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to Verizon, Vonage is using proprietary technology that was developed by Verizon and its predecessors. However, Vonage says all of its technologies were developed internally and licensed from third parties and vowed to "vigorously defend" itself against Verizon. The patents cover connecting Internet calls to landline telephone networks, voice mail, and call waiting. It should be an interesting battle, and one that could help determine whether established telephone giants or new startups deliver Internet-based telephony to the masses.

 

Most Microsoft Employees Use Google

Well, duh. That's like saying most Google employees use Microsoft Word. (Which they might not.) Some Web researchers began examining whether Microsoft's employees were using Google's search engine or the company's own MSN Search. It turns out that 80 percent of Microsoft employees use Google, compared to just 20 percent for MSN. Although this information might trigger some cheap chuckles in certain corners, I have a different perspective. How sad would it be if Microsoft actually required its employees to use its own search engine? The fact that the statistics at Microsoft so closely mirror the wider world shows you that the company isn't overbearing to its employees. And these statistics should inspire the people working at MSN Search to make it better. If you can't get your own employees to use the product, then what's the point?

 

Microsoft Begins Testing of Windows Server 2003 SP2

This week, Microsoft started the first external tests of Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 (SP2), which will include all previously released security bulletin updates, individual hotfixes released to customers since the initial release of Windows 2003, and additional fixes to increase reliability, robustness, and security. Put simply: There are no major new features (unlike SP1). No word yet on when Windows 2003 SP2 is due.

 

EU Still Waiting on Adobe's Vista Complaint

For the past several weeks, we've been eagerly awaiting Adobe's antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft, but according to regulators at the European Union (EU), it's not coming. "We have not ... received any complaint from Adobe," an EU spokesperson said, noting that he, too, had been expecting one. Adobe, of course, is freaking out about Microsoft wanting to include support for Adobe's PDF format in Office 2007 and for Microsoft's PDF competitor, XML Paper Specification (XPS), in Windows Vista and Office 2007. I just have two questions. Why would Microsoft make a technology that's similar to PDF but not as good? And why would Adobe try to prevent Microsoft from distributing PDF and therefore making it more widely available?

 

New Tool Prevents Microsoft Spyware

If you're worried about Microsoft's Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) notification tool, which security researchers have labeled as spyware because it silently phones home to Microsoft, I might have a solution. (Calm down, it doesn't involve buying a Mac.) Guillaume Kaddouch, a French developer, created an application called RemoveWGA that stops the notification tool but leaves the core part of WGA, called WGA validation, intact. In other words, you can't use RemoveWGA to run a pirated Windows version, but you can use it to stop the constant revalidations. Sounds good to me. (The site is currently down but should be back up soon.)

http://www.firewallleaktester.com/removewga.htm

 

Just in Case You Were Still Wondering: Linux Isn't a Threat to Windows Desktop

One of the comical things I enjoy doing every year is collecting all of the inevitable stories that seem to arrive each January declaring that, yes, this year will be the year of desktop Linux. It's been going on for a decade now, and in case you haven't noticed, Linux-based desktops aren't exactly sweeping across the world in record numbers. This week, Bill Hilf, Microsoft's general manager of platform strategy, finally explained why he believes Linux is never going to be a desktop application. "The loosely coupled model of development prevents Linux from being successful on the desktop," he said. "It's not a Red Hat or IBM problem. It's a model issue." Hilf also noted that once you get past the mythology of Linux, the truth is that the quality of most open-source software is below that of commercial software. And when you get right down to it, consumers don't want bits and pieces, they want the whole thing, and they want it to work. Say what you will about Windows, there's an entire industry built around supporting that OS with hardware, software, and other accessories. Windows isn't something you can easily replace.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Sachin
    6 years ago
    Jun 25, 2006

    While Adobe may publicly claim that they're scared MS will "embrace and extend" their pdf format, the real reason, as Christopher and (much to lotsa's chagrin) shark pointed out, seems to be that Adobe is worried that they'll lose a major source of revenue. That's my opinion.

  • Christopher
    6 years ago
    Jun 24, 2006

    "but given their relative histories and past behaviour, I trust Adobe far more than Microsoft"

    You shouldn't.

    A "format" like PDF can be generated in multiple ways. For example, consider MP3 encoders. Fraunhoffer was the first. Today's encoders (LAME and others) are significantly faster and create much better quality sound at lower bitrates. The students surpassed the mentor in many respects.

    MS is a decent company with some very skilled developers. Eventually, their in-house PDF efforts would resemble the Fraunhoffer codec situation. Once that happened no one would have a reason to buy an Adobe branded PDF product.

    You either create a revenue stream, or an open standard. Those two are mutually exclusive without exception. Pretending otherwise is disingenuous, but it has apparently fooled some people into thinking Adobe is "open" regarding the format (the result of token gestures that have no potential of causing fiscal pain).

    Another way... Virtually every document that ends up as a PDF starts its life in MS Word. If Word could natively create PDF, 95% of Adobe's Acrobat revenue stream would vanish. Free built-in tools based on standards (or generally accepted capabilities) always pummel non-free add-ons. The same thing happened to Netscape, WinZip, WinFax, etc, etc.

  • Lotsa
    6 years ago
    Jun 24, 2006

    "You sometimes come off rational, but today..."

    Blame it on the weather. It's been a bad day. I completely stand by my accurate (if somewhat smarmy) paragraph that you quoted. Adobe owns PDF, they have the right to do with it what they wish, and if they're worried about Microsoft screwing it up, they have the right to Just Say No.

    "XPS will replace PDF in 10-20 year's time if they fight it."

    I would HOPE that there's something better than PDF in the next 10-20 years. That's a long, long time, and what you're describing is known in some circles as "progress".

    "While Microsoft does have a history of Embrace and Extend, ultimately I feel Adobe is making a mistake."

    Perhaps. I'm not thrilled about any "standard" being in the hands/control of ANY one company, and that includes PDF--but given their relative histories and past behaviour, I trust Adobe far more than Microsoft, and I completely understand Adobe's reticence in this matter.

  • Orion
    6 years ago
    Jun 24, 2006

    Lotsa,

    While you're better than some, today I felt you were more in the detached-from-reality Apple user than you've sometimes been. You sometimes come off rational, but today...

    "You've got it wrong (again) sharky. Adobe isn't 'worried' about anything. They are simply protecting their intellectual property. As the creator and owner of the PDF specification, they're free to license it as they see fit, and not permit it to be stolen by an entity like Microsoft. It has do with 'intellectual property rights' and an economic system called 'capitalism'. You might have read about it somewhere. I think it's in the same chapter as 'Antitrust violation' and 'Monopoly'."

    Me me this wasn't funny, it wasn't accurate, and it wasn't civil.

    As to the accurate part: Adobe has made their claim that they freely license their technology to everyone for inclusion in 3rd party products. However, Adobe has stated that they think Microsoft, given its history of Embrace and Extend, would modify PDF. Microsoft chimed back stating that a significant number of companies already extend PDF and it's hypocritical to prevent Microsoft from bundling PDF functionality in Office, but not prevent others as Microsoft hasn't made any attempts to extend it.

    While Microsoft does have a history of Embrace and Extend, ultimately I feel Adobe is making a mistake. When you fight the natural evolution of the market, you're going to get screwed, just further down the line. For example, protectionist tariffs are good short term, but put in place long term they prevent your industry from investing in more efficient technologies and processes. Adobe, rather than embrace a combined standard that's in their control as well as Microsoft's will simply fight and lose. XPS will replace PDF in 10-20 year's time if they fight it.

  • Sachin
    6 years ago
    Jun 23, 2006

    "* Ship needs to be restarted every 200 miles
    * Everyone on board gets a virus"

    lol.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.