Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

January 16, 2004 12:00 AM

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of January 19

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #41478
Rating: (0)

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

 

HP, WMA, and Credibility
   Macintosh advocates descended on me this week like a biblical plague, quoting a "Wired News" article that "proved" that my contention last week that HP is working to add Windows Media Audio (WMA) support to Apple Computer's iPod is false. Apparently, no one actually read the article, in which an HP executive said, "We're not going to be supporting WMA for now." Notice that little caveat at the end of that sentence: "for now." That stipulation sounds more like an implicit verification that the company is, in fact, planning to add WMA support rather than the reverse. But two bigger matters arose during this episode. First, most of the people who complained about this topic were completely out to lunch. This week, I discovered such laughable myths as "Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) is open source" and "Apple's Protected AAC is an open standard if you just remove the Digital Rights Management (DRM) part of it." Second, I was surprised at how many people accused me of making up the WMA-on-iPod tidbit. As I noted last week, I got this information from a reliable HP contact who was familiar with the agreement between Apple and HP, and for whatever it's worth, I wasn't the only person standing next to her when she gave me this information. Life is too short to make up stories like this (and what would I gain?) unless, of course, I'm interested in writing for a high-tech equivalent of "The National Enquirer." From a reporting standpoint, using anonymous sources often presents problems, and reporters have to go with their gut feelings. Sometimes these things pan out; sometimes they don't. But the jury is still out on this story, folks, and whatever happens, nothing can change one simple fact: I was told what I was told, and I believed (and still believe) the disclosure was important enough to report. I stand by that decision and by my opinions of AAC and WMA. I've heard nothing this week that sways me from that stance. I will, however, follow up with a detailed article on the SuperSite for Windows that will compare AAC with WMA.     

Some Comments About Mac Advocacy
   In another vein, this week's controversy raises some other related concerns. When I reviewed Windows XP more than 2 years ago, I compared it with the then-current version of Mac OS X and lamented that things had changed. "In the good old days, I could write up an article about the Macintosh or its admittedly beautiful OS," I wrote, "and if it contained even the smallest hint of criticism toward ... Apple ... I could be sure that my Inbox would be flooded with vitriolic hate mail from every corner of the Mac community." Those days are back, although now my Inbox isn't getting flooded, the feedback form on the WinInfo Web site is. This fact casts both good and bad reflections on people in the Mac community who chose to participate. First, they clearly care about their platform and are willing to defend it, which is great, and I salute them for that. Second, most of the feedback was devoid of content, used out-of-date "facts" to back up arguments, or resorted to expletive-laden name-calling in lieu of facts. None of these things help the Mac cause, but they do harm the Mac community's credibility when it touts the Mac platform as superior. If people want to intelligently refute my article with facts, I'm listening, and I think I surprised several people this week by responding in point-by-point fashion through email as to why their beliefs are off base. In the end, we all love technology, and a middle ground does exist. But too often, people who feel strongly about a cause let emotions get in the way of facts. And no group feels more strongly about its cause than Mac advocates.

Microsoft Tests Longhorn Technology Names
   From WinBeta.org: This week, Microsoft reportedly gave Longhorn developers an opportunity to vote for some possible names for technology platforms in the next Windows version. The names include
   - Avalon (low-level graphics engine)
        Windows Presentation Subsystem/Services
        Windows Graphics Subsystem/Services
        Windows User eXperience Subsystem/Services
   - Extensible Application Markup Language (XAML--declarative programming)
        Windows Markup Language
        Windows Declarative Language
        Windows Design Language
   - WinFS (storage engine)
        Windows Storage Subsystem/Services/Management Services
        Windows Data Subsystem/Services/Management Services
        Windows Information Subsystem/Services/Management Services
        Windows File System
   - Indigo (Web services infrastructure)
        Windows Communication Subsystem/Services
        Windows Network Subsystem/Services
   - ClickOnce (software deployment)
        Windows Deployment Subsystem/Services
        Windows Distribution Subsystem/Services

Microsoft Bows to Courts, Will Modify Windows XP Music Links
   Under pressure from the US Department of Justice (DOJ), Microsoft agreed this week to alter the behavior of one "Shop for Music Online" hyperlink in XP that launches Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) even when users have selected another browser as their default. The DOJ complained that this link violated Microsoft's antitrust settlement, in which the company said it would respect the rights of users to choose other browsers over IE. "While we differed in our interpretation of the consent decree, we are pleased that the changes we'll be making also address the government concerns about this feature," a Microsoft representative said. Why Microsoft even argued against this complaint is a mystery to me. Clearly the link violates the agreement.

Microsoft Wins Big Ruling in Sun Antitrust Case
   The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed Sun Microsystems a stunning legal defeat in its antitrust battle against Microsoft when the court ruled that it won't accept the facts argued in the federal government's antitrust case against Microsoft. The decision means that Sun will have to reargue the facts themselves, a tactic that could prove both costly and time-consuming. But the appeals court didn't dismiss the case or any key findings, as Microsoft had hoped. So when will this epic battle be played out? Don't hold your breath. The case is set to go to trial in January 2006.

Munich Linux Rollout Hits a Snag
   First Massachusetts and now Munich? Germany's "Computerwoche" is reporting that Munich's move to 14,000 Linux desktops is in trouble because of budgetary concerns and "technical issues," making the publication wonder whether the city will ever be able to complete its migration to the open-source phenomenon. Hey, no one ever said migrating to Linux was going to be easy.

Intel and Microsoft Improve 32-Bit Software Performance on Itanium
   This week, Intel and Microsoft released an updated version of the software that lets Itanium processors run 32-bit Windows code, improving both the stability and performance of 32-bit Windows applications. The IA-32 Execution Layer (EL) will ship as part of the 64-bit versions of Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 (SP1), due in late 2004, but the EL is available now for download . According to the companies, the EL improves 32-bit application performance so that applications run at 50 to 60 percent of the speed of native 64-bit applications, and Intel hopes to see this figure reach 70 percent. 

Strong Earnings at IBM, Intel, Sun Hint at Tech Recovery
   IBM, Intel, and Sun posted robust earnings in the most recent quarter, leading some analysts to again ponder whether the tech industry is slowly pulling out of its slump. Intel reported record earnings of $2.17 billion on sales of $8.74 billion, more than doubling its take from the same quarter a year ago. IBM earned $2.7 billion on revenues of $25.9 billion. And although Sun continued to lose money, its loss was far less than expected: The company reported a $125 million loss on sales of $2.89 billion, far better than its $2.28 billion loss a year ago.

HP Passes Dell in Fourth Quarter, but Dell Is Number One for 2003
   Meanwhile, computing giants Dell and HP continue to circle each other like predators in a "Jurassic Park" movie, with HP surpassing Dell in fourth-quarter PC shipments to retake the sales crown and the number-one position. However, Dell retained the title for 2003, selling more PCs for the year than its close rival. HP shipped 7.52 million PCs in the final quarter of 2003, compared with Dell's 7.24 million systems. But Dell sold 25.8 million PCs worldwide in 2003, compared with HP's 25 million PCs. Gartner says that PC makers sold 168.9 million PCs worldwide in 2003 (IDC places the figure at 152.6 million). In the United States, PC makers sold 44.6 million PCs, a jump of almost 16 percent, according to IDC, with the top-five PC makers (HP, Dell, IBM, Fujitsu, and Toshiba) experiencing gains of 15 to 23 percent.

Apple's Music Technology Comes on Strong as Mac Market Share Falls
   In another hopeful sign, Apple exceeded expectations for the quarter ending December 31, posting a $63 million profit on revenues of $1.9 billion (compared with a net loss of $8 million in the same quarter a year ago). Apple sold 733,000 iPods in the quarter, which is great news, but IDC cautioned that Apple's domestic market share of the PC market has fallen from 3.5 percent to 3.2 percent, whereas its worldwide market share slid to 1.88 percent, largely because of iMac and PowerMac G5 slow sales (the company sold only 829,000 computers in the quarter). The PowerMac sales are particularly disappointing, given that product's lavish launch and "fastest personal computer on earth" marketing campaign, but I've always felt that the G5 was far too expensive. Product-quality problems also plagued Apple during the quarter, including problems with iPod replacement batteries, PowerBook G4 displays, and iBook motherboards, all of which negatively impacted the financials because of larger-than-expected warranty-replacement costs.

Mozilla Foundation Ships Mozilla 1.6
   Last night, the Mozilla Foundation shipped the most recent version of its open-source Web browser suite, Mozilla 1.6, which includes support for Windows NT LAN Manager (NTLM) authentication on Linux and Mac OS X, various improvements to the mail and news module, security fixes, and a host of other new features. For more details about Mozilla 1.6 and the free download, visit the Mozilla Foundation Web site.

Next Week
   We're taking Monday off for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day holiday in the United States, but we'll be back on Tuesday. Enjoy the long weekend!

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Jeff Lewis
    8 years ago
    Jan 22, 2004

    I have to reply to Corey Krall's comments. First, let me say that I've been a Mac owner since 1989 and Mac developer since 1986. Currently, I own three of them. I also own three PCs - two handbuilt and one laptop.

    It's one thing to be first, it's another to actually do something with that lead. Apple may have put the GUI on the first personal computer (Xerox actually invented it), but it was Microsoft who got it on 95% of the desktops - not Apple. Apple may have invented the PDA and viable handwriting, but it was Palm who actually got into the hands of a lot of people. Apple may have put out the first laser printer - but it was companies like Samsung who made them cheap enough for 'the rest of us'.

    I also think that there are times when we give Apple way too much credit for being first. Apple didn't invent USB or even WiFi. Both were around before the iMac hit the streets. Apple just made a bigger deal of them and seemed to kick off a revolution: but if you look at the actual sales timing, you see a different story - USB and WiFi device sales actually didn't take off until Win98SE showed up - with USB support. Similarly, WiFi didn't take off until Windows gained support for it. To show it's not a quirk - look at Bluetooth. Apple did their 'we're first' thing with that and stuck it on every Mac - but this time Microsoft didn't leap in with support in WinXP. So Bluetooth is almost irrelevent - it's just not widely supported or used - even though Apple tried to promote it.

    Apple may be good at razzledazzle and selling style - but the meat and potatoes computer use comes from Microsoft.

    Apple was supposed to be (by their own words) the company 'for the rest of us' - but from the very beginning - it was the company 'for the rest of us with lots of cash'... and most of us don't have lots of cash.

    So to answer your question: Is Mercedes and BMW irrelevent - actually, yes - to the vast majority of us, they are.

    Finally, you say that if more people opened their minds to MacOS, they'd be surprised. I argue the exact thing in reverse: most Mac users I know who have major problems using Windows have these problems because they demand that Windows behave like MacOS. If THEY'D open up their closed minds, perhaps THEY'D be surprised.


    Editor's note: So I agree with most of this. The whole "Apple is like BMW" argument, however, is bogus. BMW doesn't compete in a market against exactly one competitor who both owns 95 percent of the market and makes a superior product. Instead, the three biggest car makers (all of which own two or more brands) control about 65 percent of the market, and the rest id divided between dozens of players. The PC market has consolidated to the market we have now: One major player and a couple of also-rans. And because BMW is a luxury car maker, that comparison casts Apple in an undeservedly positive light. Besides, Apple only has 1.88 percent of the PC market. They're more like Kia than any other car company: Few people would actually consider buying one, but those that do are impressed with their advantages. --Paul

  • Pit
    8 years ago
    Jan 20, 2004

    " Editor's note: Again, just the sort of friendly feedback I was talking about. Thanks."

    Poor Paul! What did you expect? That people will say "Thank you" for your provocations? Your obvious MS-biased articles? Your constant mockery about everything non MS? Your FUD? Your insults on people which have chosen something else than MS and which think that freedom and choice is better than an MS market monoply?

    I can see only two reasons for your behaviour:

    1. Either you're very bored writing about MS or

    2. You perceive the alternatives as superior and therefore have to justify your decision for Windows somehow.


    Editor's note: There's a third choice, which would never occur to you. I'm correct about the WMA/AAC debate. --Paul

  • Cliff Stevens
    8 years ago
    Jan 19, 2004

    Paul,

    I read your response (below) to my concern that you are lumping all mac advocates together and asking us to do the impossible - i.e., stop each and every mac advocate out there from being a jerk. I was disappointed with your response - which itself seems to lump all mac advocates together again. I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like you don't intend to stop this practice.

    Paul, even if mac advocates as a whole are worse than say, Saab advocates, what's your advice as to how we should get every "antogonistic" mac advocate out there to stop?


    Editor's note: The Mac community, what can I say? It's in trouble. And it comes straight from the top: The constant lying and exaggerating from Steve Jobs on down at Apple is a huge (and, frankly, actionable) problem. That Mac advocates not only accept these lies, but propagate them gleefully, is another problem. Heck, Jobs even made fun of people who ordered G5s last summer but couldn't get them because Apple re-routed many of the early machines to the Virginia Tech super-computer project. And what was the response? Spastic fans practically threw roses on the stage. It's astonishing to me that people can act that way and then accuse PC people (whatever that means; we're really just "almost every computer using person in the world") of being lemmings.

    So what can you do? You could do what I do, for starters: Be honest about Apple and its products. You could correct people when they repeat, for the upteenth time, some bit of chicanery about Apple or its products to others. It's all over the press. I still see reports that cite Apple's "5 percent market share," which it hasn't had since the 1990's, or credit Apple for many technologies it didn't event or popularize. Write those journalists and set them straight. They're the ones propagating mistruths.

    I'm not anti-Apple. But I cannot believe some of the stuff I hear and read on a regular basis. It's time for the Anti-EvangeList, but done fairly: You shouldn't lost askance at every positive bit of news; but you should seek the truth. --Paul

  • Michael Weiss
    8 years ago
    Jan 18, 2004

    Paul -
    I am an avid PC user, but I don't like reading plain Apple-bashing! As a person of the media, you are in a position where you have the ability to aggravate or appease your readers. Why not be impartial and not bash a group of people just for the fun of it? Just be responsible. Surely if you insult people, you can only expect worse insults back.

    Remember, we're only talking about computers here, not world politics (although sometimes the rhetoric gets that absurd in the comments i read).

  • Jay Hillman
    8 years ago
    Jan 17, 2004

    Paul,

    You hit the Mac Advocacy nail right on the head! Like you, I also own and use both platforms and have never understood Mac users rabid enthusiasm for the machine and borderline violent hatred for anything Microsoft.

    Yes, my Mac works great for the publishing work I do (w/Illustrator, Photoshop & Quark Xpress) and for email, web surfing, etc..but my PCs were much better values. Both are just machines I use to make a living, nothing more, nothing less.

    PC hardware is much faster and, due to cutthroat competition, much cheaper. A P4 running at 2.2 GHz is considered a low end PC Processor, where Apple sells slow 1 GHz CPUs in its low end desktops (eMacs).

    Windows XP is far from a perfect OS, but it gets the job done. I've run Apple OS 8.1 (total junk), 8.6, 9.1, 9.22, and 10.2 Jaguar on my Macs through the years and have to say I liked the performance of 9.22 best.

    I remember, years ago, when I purchased my trusty old PowerPC 8500 brand new, a Mac owning friend at work seemed almost confounded that I didn't quit using my PCs and throw them in the dumpster or something...go figure..

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.