Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

January 14, 2005 12:00 AM

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of January 17

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #45096
Rating: (7)

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

 

Apple: Just Kidding, We'll Try to Compete on the Low-End Now
   At a riotous MacWorld keynote address earlier this week, Apple CEO Steve Jobs contradicted earlier promises and introduced two products he had previously said Apple would never produce: A sub-$500 Macintosh computer and a flash RAM-based iPod audio player dubbed iPod shuffle. And contrary to my pre-MacWorld analysis of the rumored low-end Mac, the Mac mini, as the computer is known, looks awesome. In fact, it's so good, I expect Apple to sell millions of them this year. We can bicker about the missing features (no keyboard, mouse, or screen--stock components that come with a typical $500 PC, which is also more expandable), but it doesn't matter. By hitting the $500 sweet spot, Apple now has a credible vehicle, finally, for increasing the Mac's market share. And the display-less iPod shuffle? It's a stroke of genius with an amazingly small form factor (think pack-of-gum small) that will also sell in the millions in 2005. I've berated Apple when it does the wrong thing, but with the Mac mini and iPod shuffle, Apple has proven that it can deliver when it needs to. Very, very impressive.

Thanks to iPod Sales, Apple Profits Quadruple in Quarter
   Speaking of Apple, the company revealed this week that its profits for the quarter ending December 31, 2004, were up almost 500 percent to $295 million on sales of $3.49 billion. Apple credited the surging iPod for the improvement, and though iPod sales in the quarter fell short of the 5 million units analysts were expecting, the 4.6 million iPods the company did sell is still an impressive number. Even Macintosh sales were up, with Apple selling over 1 million Macs in a quarter for the first time in more than 4 years. Apple's iTunes Music Store, which made only a small profit, has sold over 230 million songs to date, the company noted. Let's recap: Apple's kicking butt with the iPod, and it has a new iPod out that will likely sweep up the two-thirds of the portable digital audio market that Apple doesn't already own. And though the Mac is now stuck with less than 2 percent of the PC market, the recent Mac sales resurgence occurred before Apple announced the Mac mini, which should dramatically improve matters. Apple--and the Mac, from what I can tell--are back.


Intel Ups Revenue Forecast, Cites Huge Demand
   Microprocessor giant Intel this week announced that stronger-than-expected demand for its product would increase revenue about 10 percent over previously reported levels for the current quarter. Intel also released positive guidance for calendar year 2005, noting that a successful 2004 holiday season was just the beginning of a strong period of growth. Intel spent much of 2004 fending off its chief rival AMD, which had seized mindshare with its 64-bit AMD-64 platform, now called x64. However, with Intel announcing plans to ship x64-compatible chips in early 2004, then delivering a compatible 64-bit workstation chip in late 2004, the company has largely caught up with its smaller, faster rival. Intel will soon ship a family of x64-compatible Pentium 4 chips as well.


Microsoft CFO Bails on Troubled Company
   OK, so maybe "troubled" isn't quite the right word, as the company had $36.8 billion in revenues last year. But Microsoft CFO John Connors said this week that he would leave the company to pursue a new career at a venture capital firm in the Seattle area and spend more time with his family. Connors had been with Microsoft for more than 16 years and had spent the last 5 years as CFO. But the 55-hour work weeks apparently took their toll. Maybe Connors will eventually write a book, which we can hope will be more exciting than "The Fiefdom Syndrome," the snooze-a-thon produced by previous Microsoft CFO Bob Herbold.


IBM Sets 500 Patents Free ... Free As in Beer
   Computing giant IBM this week said that it would be making more than 500 of its patents freely available to anyone working on open source software projects such as Linux. The move stands in sharp contrast to the ways in which most corporations jealously guard their patent portfolios, using them as legal hammers with which they can pummel competition. IBM, with hundreds of thousands of patents--it received more than 3200 patents in 2004 alone--is the largest patent holder in the world. In fact, I've heard that the company owns the patents for the color beige, the taste of strawberries, and that weird effect that happens when the moon seems like it's following you home at night. It's quite a company.


Microsoft and Yahoo Begin Eating Away at Google's Lead
   A study by Keynote Systems says that search wannabes such as Microsoft and Yahoo are starting to eat away at Google's lead, largely because the rival products are friendlier and provide better-quality search results, according to study participants. The study, which polled 2000 Web users, found "significant improvements" in the search results offered by MSN Search and Yahoo Search, while Google's search results were essentially unimproved. The big problem with search engines, of course, is unwanted results--an area in which all the competitors can improve. Still, Google is likely to retain its search engine crown through 2005. But it will be interesting to see where things stand a year from now.


Yahoo Ships Desktop Search Tool
   And speaking of Yahoo, the company this week released its Yahoo Desktop Search beta for Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 (SP3) and higher and XP, joining a suddenly crowded market that includes such companies as Microsoft/MSN, Google, Copernic, and X1. Yahoo Desktop Search helps you quickly find various file types and email messages and provides an interesting preview feature that works with Excel spreadsheets, PDF documents, and other document types. I'll be looking at Yahoo Desktop Search to see how it stacks up against my current favorite solution, MSN Toolbar Suite. You can download Yahoo Desktop Search from the Yahoo Web site.
   http://desktop.yahoo.com


AOL's Case: The Time Warner Merger Was My Fault
   In a rare moment of candor during an appearance this week at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California, former AOL CEO Steve Case took blame for the failure that was the AOL/Time Warner merger. "I probably wasn't the right guy to be a chairman of a company with 90,000 employees," he noted. However, Case took some credit for spreading the Internet to non-technical users and instituting innovative Instant Messaging (IM) features. For me, Case will always be remembered for his stiff, Munster-like appearance and his absolute hatred of Microsoft. Like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs, Case was more business man than technologist, and his hard-edged business acumen was what drove AOL to the top. As for the Time Warner merger, well, at least give him credit for actually doing it: At the time, AOL was riding high on the fortunes of the Internet boom, and it succeeded in snagging an established media conglomerate. Not too shabby.


Sony PSP to Launch in US in March
   Sony will launch its eagerly awaited PlayStation Portable (PSP) in the US in March at a price of less than $200. Keith Furman and I saw the PSP last week at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2005 and were impressed by the quality of video on its widescreen display. But the real news about the PSP, of course, is the games that will accompany the device at launch. Unlike Nintendo's rival DS device, which shipped with just a handful of titles late last year, the PSP will be accompanied by a much wider allotment of games, including crucial Electronic Arts titles such as Need For Speed Underground Rivals, Tiger Woods PGA TOUR, MVP Baseball, FIFA Soccer, NBA Street: Showdown, and NFL Street 2: Unleashed. But where's Madden? Even the DS has a version of Madden.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 22, 2005

    True I wouldn’t call it a virus, but it is still obviously a script that was able to propagate itself from one OS X box to another silently. Almost sounded like a cross-site scripting attack. I thought you said this was impossible? I assume this exploit has been corrected, but it was there at some point.

    Say what?? Silently propogate. One had to convince a user to go to the website. I would hardly call this silently propogate. This is nonsense.

    Listen, I don't use Mac OS X. I use Windows and I am tired of the crap out of Microsoft these days. I am attempting to take the devil's advocate position because so many here have blinders on and think we all live in some magical Stepford world here. The fact is IE needs to be updated and we as customers shouldn't have to wait until Longhorn for this revision.

    I as a customer shouldn't have to replace my system also when Longhorn runs, just because someone in Microsoft thinks we need to up the memory or CPU requirements by bloating software so greatly that it won't run on existing hardware.

    I have installed XP SP 2, I have a hardware based NAT Firewall. I don't have ports open on the Internet. Yet, I know that my system is still vulnerable, for one reason--the lack of security in XP due to Active X.

    My hope is that the continual improvement in OSX and Linux will actual grow their market share so that there is some competition. Without this hope, we are left to the whims of Microsoft and the drive for the almighty dollar over actually satisfying customers. Their drive will make them a has-been in 10-15 years, or whenever Bill and Steve decide to retire. The company will not survive when they leave.

    When are they going to wake up and take a long term strategy. There original idea of a computer on every desk and every home was something I could latch onto. Lately, they have no vision. Sadly, they have abandon their passion and desire and only focus on the bottom line.

    Apple is one of the few companies left with a passion. There goal isn't domination. Heck, they don't care if they ever get majority of the desktops. There goal is to produce a product that will work for consumers. Last time, I checked, they seem to be doing a lot better job of it than Microsoft lately. There latest financial show growth and improvement. Microsoft's financial shows status quo. There hope for growth is subscription based software. Where is the wow in that.

    The fact is OSX is a better OS and Microsoft's answer is wait for Longhorn, it will be the most innovative and secure OS yet. Where have we heard this before? Let's see Windows 2000, Windows XP. I thought they stated that these were the most innovative and secure.
    Steve, open your eyes.

    Try to argue the other viewpoint and see where it leads you. You will realize where your own favorite OS is lacking. Then, as a consumer demand more. Microsoft can do a lot better. They did in the 80's and early 90's before they grew to monopoly status. I long for that company to return, just as the fire in Apple has returned. We need some life in the computer business.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 22, 2005

    “XP Professional rates worse with 60 vulnerabilities and 25% unpatched. These aren't my words.”

    I don’t believe “XP has less security flaws than OS X” were my words either.

    I do believe however that “XP.. rates worse” are very much your words in a way.

    They just come off as some sort of smug commentary on your part when it simply wasn't required.

    A sort of childish dig because I dared to suggest that OS X also has exploits.

    Steve

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 21, 2005

    “Steve your last response is very humorous.”

    Thanks. :c)

    “I hope you meant it as humor and don't actually believe what you wrote.”

    Every word of it.. :c)

    “If you had, you would have seen that the so-called virus isn't a virus by the standard definition of a virus. It might be called a "philshing" or similar attack in which human engineering of the attack is prevelent.“

    True I wouldn’t call it a virus, but it is still obviously a script that was able to propagate itself from one OS X box to another silently. Almost sounded like a cross-site scripting attack. I thought you said this was impossible? I assume this exploit has been corrected, but it was there at some point.

    " If you read the background discussion thread for the second link, you will see that the vast majority of responses were that the attack was one of a system that was somehow physically comprimised where the OS X rootkit (or parts of the rootkit) were installed"

    I did read into the background of the Opener Malware Worm after I had made my original post. It was an interesting read including responses from people who didn’t think their machine has been “physically comprimised” (sic).

    http://macintouch.com/opener.html

    Get reading. It suggests numerous potential security vulnerability’s around this Worm. I think the consensus was that the worm required some vulnerability to be installed, but I haven’t seen a consensus on what it was exactly.

    “Finally, if you read the last article and went to the Secunia web site, you will see that OS X has 39 vulnerabilities listed (many involving other open source software like Apache, that may or may not be running on a typical user's install--since these apps are turned off by default on installation…”

    Give me a break! Now you are just being flat out dishonest by attempting to brush off many of the OS X exploits listed by trying to blame it all on “other open source software”….

    Laugh your head off, but the facts are:

    OS X has had exploits. Many involving OS X itself or Apple applications such as iChat and Safari.

    OS X will have exploits discovered in future, both in the OS and Apple software installed.

    If Apple ever gets any marketshare, somebody is bound to come along and exploit them.

    Steve

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 21, 2005

    Steve your last response is very humorous. I hope you meant it as humor and don't actually believe what you wrote. I hope you actually read the links you provided. If you had, you would have seen that the so-called virus isn't a virus by the standard definition of a virus. It might be called a "philshing" or similar attack in which human engineering of the attack is prevelent. If you read the background discussion thread for the second link, you will see that the vast majority of responses were that the attack was one of a system that was somehow physically comprimised where the OS X rootkit (or parts of the rootkit) were installed. Finally, if you read the last article and went to the Secunia web site, you will see that OS X has 39 vulnerabilities listed (many involving other open source software like Apache, that may or may not be running on a typical user's install--since these apps are turned off by default on installation). You will see that there is only one unpatched vulnerability. If you go to the XP Home stats, you will see that 58 vulnerabilities are listed with 24% unpatched. XP Professional rates worse with 60 vulnerabilities and 25% unpatched. These aren't my words. Read your links yourself. Again, I hope this was an attempt at humor and that you weren't serious with your post.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Jan 20, 2005

    “Steve, can you name a virus that has effected OSX (not OS9, not MS Word, but OSX, itself)?”

    Google "OSX Virus"

    Switchback
    http://www.lowendmac.com/lite/03/0813.html

    That was hard…

    "Can you name what the security vulnerabilities are that have been found? "

    Google "OS Malware"

    http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39164062,00.htm

    or

    Mac OS X security myth exposed
    http://www.techworld.com/security/news/index.cfm?newsid=1798

    That was hard too.. *rolls eyes*

    Please stop wasting my time if you can not be bothered to do a modicum of research.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.