Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
December 05, 2003 12:00 AM

WinInfo Short Takes: Week of December 8

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #41069
Rating: (0)

An often irreverent look at some of the week's other news...

Windows Server 2003, Linux Experience Sharp Growth
   According to a report from market researchers at IDC, sales of Windows Server 2003- and Linux-based servers are on the rise, thanks to a move toward less expensive, PC-like servers. Revenue from systems running Windows Server grew 10.3 percent year over year to $3.4 billion, and unit sales rose 21.4 percent, IDC said. Meanwhile, Linux server revenues grew 49.8 percent to $743 million; unit shipments of Linux servers increased 51.4 percent. The trend toward smaller, less expensive servers seems to be benefiting PC companies as well: Although Dell is still in fourth place in the overall server market, the company grew 11.6 percent in the quarter and is now ready to overtake number-three server maker Sun Microsystems, which produces large, expensive, proprietary machines. (IBM holds first place, followed by HP.) And speaking of large, expensive, and proprietary, you shouldn't be surprised to hear that the UNIX server market, with a 3.8 percent year-over-year revenue slide, is on the way out. UNIX is still the largest server segment, valued at $4.1 billion for the quarter, but IDC says that situation can't last.

Gartner: Linux, Not Windows, Will Kill UNIX
   And speaking of problems with UNIX, the masters of the obvious at Gartner revealed this week that they believe Linux is a much bigger threat to UNIX than it is to Windows. The company says that 60 percent of large enterprises will migrate 80 percent of their UNIX-based applications to Linux by 2008. And after 2008, Gartner says, "most vendors offering UNIX will provide OS maintenance support only, continuing the trend several years into the next decade."

Gates: Windows Less Expensive, More Secure than Linux
   And speaking of Linux, Microsoft Chairman and Chief Software Architect Bill Gates was speaking about Linux just this week. He noted that Linux is "a significantly more expensive solution" than Windows and that Linux is less secure. "If you look at security," he said, "there are three things to consider. One is the number of critical security updates. We are significantly better than Linux or UNIX on that. The second would be how quickly you make these updates available. We are significantly better than UNIX or Linux on that. The third thing is propagation. If you have a virus or worm that is scanning to go find somebody else to hop to, and you don't stop propagation, then popularity is your enemy. So this is a bigger problem for us than for other platforms. No one else stops propagation, but we have to. It's our fault--a faux pas--that we didn't make it clear to customers how to prevent propagation. And that is something that we are going to provide to customers. We are going to give them free tools to do that." Gates's comments fly in the face of conventional wisdom, and for that he's sure to get a lot of flack. But I've always believed that a blind trust in unproven Linux capabilities would come back to haunt people. Regardless, no one should dismiss the amazing security work Microsoft is doing: No other company is working that hard on security right now.

Gentoo Linux Servers Attacked
   And speaking of Linux and security, Linux backers faced another embarrassing security breach this week when an attacker remotely compromised one of the servers that Gentoo Linux uses to update users' computers. After trying to fend off the attack, Gentoo technicians eventually took the server offline, the second time high-profile Linux-based servers have been forced offline in as many weeks. (In late November, an attack took four Debian Project servers offline.) "We have a very detailed forensic trail of what happened once the box was breached, so we are reasonably confident that the [software] stored on that box was unaffected," Gentoo Linux representatives said in a message to users. "The attackers appear to have installed a rootkit and modified/deleted some files to cover their tracks, but left the server otherwise untouched. The box was in a compromised state for approximately one hour before it was discovered and shut down. The method used to gain access to the box remotely is still under investigation."

Schools Get a Microsoft Price Break
   One of the prickly topics that arose in the wake of Microsoft's intellectual property licensing revelation this week was how the new licensing will affect educational institutions, which for years have been licensing much of this technology at a steep discount. Well, fear not: Microsoft has also slashed licensing costs for schools, saving them 20 to 37 percent when compared with earlier licensing costs. "Teachers have told us they want to be using our software," David Burrows, director group manager for Microsoft UK, said. "It's very popular, the children's parents use ... it at work. We're just recognizing the popularity of our products." Naturally, schools are a great place to get started with acclimating people to Microsoft software. But many schools, especially those with computer-science programs, are keenly interested in free Windows alternatives such as Linux.

Will Vietnam Be Microsoft's Vietnam?
   Vietnam revealed this week that it's beginning a process of adopting open-source software (OSS) solutions. "We are trying step by step to eliminate Microsoft," Nguyen Trung Quynh, a member of Vietnam's Ministry of Science and Technology, said. Specifically, the country is looking into software such as Linux and OpenOffice.org that's free and can be downloaded from the Internet. Part of the appeal of OSS is that it could help eliminate the country's rampant software-piracy problems, a thorny situation in the wake of a recent trade agreement with the United States. Because Vietnam's populace is so poor, most commercial software is simply too expensive.

Malaysian Pirates Sell Longhorn Alpha. But Why?
   And speaking of Southeast Asia, Malaysian software pirates are selling an early alpha build of Longhorn, the next Windows version, in street markets for less than $2. The alpha build, which Microsoft handed out to developers in late October at the Professional Developers Conference (PDC) 2003, is hardly indicative of Microsoft's final plans for Longhorn and, in many ways, barely works. Why nondevelopers would want it to begin with is unclear.

Good News: Intel Raises Revenue Forecast
   In what might be taken as a sign that the economy is improving, Intel raised its fourth-quarter revenue forecast this week. Thanks to stronger-than-expected holiday sales, the company now expects income to fall in the $8.5 to $8.7 billion range, up from its earlier estimate of $8.1 to $8.7 billion. "If you look at how this company is positioned right now, there's no reason for anything but optimism," Pacific Crest Securities Senior Research Analyst Michael McConnell said.

Bad News: Hard Disk Sales Fall
   Although Intel forecasts are up, sales of hard disks fell 0.3 percent year over year in the most recent quarter, indicating that the oft-delayed IT financial turnaround still isn't happening. The poor sales happened despite ever-decreasing hard disk prices and ever-increasing capacities. "We are not seeing some great turnaround out at the hardware-infrastructure side," IDC Group Vice President John McArthur said.

Good News: Best Buy Reports Sharp Increase in Holiday Sales
   But wait, there's more. Holiday sales at Best Buy were up 8.6 percent over a similar period last year, leading some analysts to predict that the economy is back on track. The sales increase at Best Buy was the largest jump in quarterly sales in more than 2 years, the company noted. Competitor Circuit City experienced an increase as well, with a 4 percent rise in post-Thanksgiving holiday sales.

AOL Offers $299 PC
   Everyone's favorite dominant ISP introduced an intriguing offer this week: Agree to use AOL for a year, and you can purchase a low-end PC from the company for just $299. Although the deal seems like a bid to stem the flow of subscribers eager to get out from under the multicolored, dumbed-down AOL interface, the offer actually appears to be decent, assuming you're not into playing the latest 3-D games. Of course, you can get a decent Dell system for not much more than the cost of the AOL PC plus the service (about $585 when you add it all up). For more information, check out the AOL Web site.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • jim
    9 years ago
    Dec 11, 2003

    Paul - I have to partly agree w/ Wendy on this one. By you earlier statements one could safely conclude that PowerPoint is part of the Windows OS.

    Look at it this way

    Your stated "If it's bundled with a distribution ... it's part of the OS", so let's examine that for a sec.

    Linux.
    The people at kernel.org makes the new version of Linux and sends it off to RedHat, SUSE, etc.. RedHat adds packages to the core OS (sendmail, apache, mysql, etc) and puts it in their distribution channel.

    Microsoft.
    Microsoft makes a new version of Windows and sends it off to Dell, HP, etc... Dell adds programs to the core OS (AOL, Office 2003, MS Money) and puts it into their distribution channel.

    I'm not sure you can properly claim that MS is the distributor of the Windows software without allowing that Linux is distributed via kernel.org and NOT RedHat, SUSE, etc.


    Editor's note: A "distribution" is a set of software. Hardware makers do *not* receive images from Microsoft that include both Office and Windows. (Or any other software). That is something a PC makers does, adding various software. Office, AOL, whatever is not part of Windows, and never has been. A Windows "distribution" is everything that comes on the Windows CD and you can't "buy" a version of Windows that includes more than that; if you have other software on a new PC, the ultimate responsibility *to the customer* for integrating it falls on the PC maker's heads, not Microsoft's. On the other hand, Microsoft is obviously responsible for the security of all of its products. But we don't add Office vulnerabilities to Windows vulnerabilities. Many PCs, arguably most of them, do not include Office. I just bought a Dell PC, for example, that ships with no OS, and no software. It's got zero vulnerabilities and is therefore the safest PC on the planet. On the other hand, it's useless until I add potentially unsafe software to it).

    For whatever its worth, Microsoft does sell a version of Windows, Windows Server 2003 Small Business Edition, that includes ISA Server, SQL Server, and Exchange Server, among other usually separate products. This version is indeed the closest thing the Windows world has to a Linux distribution and I think it's fair to count the various product vulnerabilities against the "SBS" product, just as you would with a Linux distribution. But then this is totally in keeping with my contention that, if you distribute it as part of the OS, it is indeed part of the OS. Linux distributions, to my knowledge, never ship without applications and utilities, and certainly the most popular ones don't.

    Finally, agreeing with Wendy can be dangerous. :) She thinks with her heart and not with her head. But we love her, of course. --Paul

  • A.J.
    9 years ago
    Dec 11, 2003

    Re: Gates and Windows Security

    I'm sorry, but Gates & Co. have a lot of work to undo previous mistakes. Allowing email clients to run code is wrong - it breaks a basic security premise that code and data should not mix. Microsoft pumps way too much through port 80 (for example, SOAP) specifically to bypass firewalls. Having all featuers turned on by default (admittaably this has improved recently) was dumb because people were getting hammered by worms that had no reason to be affected at all.

    I'm not anti-Microsoft/pro-Unix (although I do run Linux whenever possible simply for cost reasons), but all software will be insecure - it's the nature of the beast. But Microsoft's history of features over security is haunting it big right now. And I think it's going to take more than better QA practices - it'll have to be a culture change. And I don't think that will happen.

    On the desktop, I think Microsoft is safe from Unix and Mac right now because of ease-of-use vs Unix and cost vs Mac. If Apple got their prices down to be comparable I could see them being a threat, but I doubt that will ever happen.

    On the server side, I can't see any reason to run Microsoft Server. I would rather run Unix and Open Source software (for most applications) than pay Microsoft. But then again some small organisations who don't know Unix at all would probably pay Microsoft and get the prettier setups.

  • Wendy_Rebecca
    9 years ago
    Dec 09, 2003

    "If it's bundled with a distribution ... it's part of the OS. --Paul "

    Paul, that may be the dumbest thing you've ever written. By that logic, PowerPoint is now part of the Windows XP OS (since Office was bundled with my DELL). Honestly, the way you strain credulity...


    Editor's note: Spare me. PowerPoint isn't bundled with Windows, ever. Just because you get it with a new PC doesn't mean Microsoft distributed it that way to PC makers (in fact, we know that they don't). Linux distribution makers are ultimately responsible for everything they ship on that distribution's CD set. If it comes with the distribution, it's part of the distribution, and part of what can constitute a security vulnerability in that distribution. --Paul

  • jim
    9 years ago
    Dec 08, 2003

    Interesting, so if it's bundled with the distribution then it's part of the OS..I must say that's a new one on me... Maybe it's the only way that MS can attempt to cast a positive light on the greater number of security fixes required for Windows. On the Windows side SBS 2003 ships with (by default) Outlook 2003, Sharepoint, Exchange, Shared Fax and RRAS, does this mean that they are now part of 'Windows'? Or take take it in another direction, I purchassed a PC for my mother from Dell which had AOL, Earthlink, McAfee and some other software loaded on it. Since it was bundled with my OS (from the end-user perspective) does that mean that AOL is now part of Windows?

    Comparing vulnerabilities in software bundled with a distribution vs. security holes in the OS is comparing apples to oranges.. One doesn't necessariliy relate to the other.


    Preston-

    I wouldn't say any of the 'Linux guys' are squirming this year. No OS is 100% secure. I'll go out on a limb here and state that nobody in a position of authority/knowledge of the Linux OS (i.e Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, etc) have claimed that Linux is 100% secure. As a whole it is generally more secure than Windows (at this point), but only if it is installed/maintained and monitored correctly.

    The last time MS was hacked like that??? I don't see anything to indicate that the attacker(s) of either of the two Linux distributions (the other two companies make apps) were able to imbed themselves into the sites in question for a period of six weeks and steal the code for future products during this time...

    The last time MS was hacked was in Oct of 2002 (http://www.vnunet.com/News/1136114)

  • Preston Sumner
    9 years ago
    Dec 05, 2003

    The last time Microsoft was hacked like that was in October of 2000.

    In this year alone, GNU, GNOME, Debian, and Gentoo have all been compromised. Also, the FSF made a strangely underreported announcement that they discovered another one of their servers had been compromised since last month.

    Not to be vindictive but...I'm amused to see all the Linux guys squirm this year. Egg on their faces. Yes, nothing is 100% secure. Welcome to the real world! Now imagine how many breaches we'd be seeing if Linux had the marketshare Windows had...

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.