Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

July 22, 2007 12:00 AM

Windows 7 Now Due in 2010, Microsoft Says

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #96607
Rating: (24)

Windows 7--the successor to Windows Vista and whose codename was first revealed here in WinInfo back in January--is now on the docket for 2010, Microsoft says. Contrary to prior reports, Windows 7, previously code-named Vienna, will be a major Windows release and will ship in both 32-bit and 64-bit variants for both consumers and businesses. This suggests that Microsoft's intention to move entirely to the 64-bit x64 codebase is proceeding slower than hoped.

At a partner conference earlier this month, Microsoft hinted that it would put the Windows client on the same type of release schedule as Windows Server, with a major release every four years interspersed by minor updates at the two-year point between each major release. Given Vista's 2006 release date, a 2010 nod for Windows 7 makes sense, since it's now considered a major release. But Microsoft won't say whether we can expect a minor Windows update first, in 2008. The company does say that Vista SP1 will ship in that year, however.

The few new details we have about Windows 7 came during Microsoft's annual sales conference late last week in Orlando. The company is apparently researching whether it can offer Windows 7 to customers on a subscription basis as well as the more typical enterprise licensing, retail, and PC bundle options. Windows 7 is the internal codename for the next major release of Windows, Microsoft notes, and the name is subject to change. The Windows 7 codename reflects the fact that this release is indeed Windows 7.0 (Vista was Windows 6.0).

If you're looking for more information on Windows 7, please check out my Windows 7 FAQ. It's early yet, but I'll continue updating the FAQ as more information becomes available.

http://www.winsupersite.com/article/faq/windows-7-faq.aspx

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Will
    5 years ago
    Jul 24, 2007

    "(Thank you, President Bush and members of the Republican Party.) "

    I'm sorry if this is callous, but blaming the highest eschelon of establishment for not getting a pay raise is a bit... uh, I don't know an appropriate word... hippy-ish? And if you ask me, judging by the sales of fairly expensive consumer electronics, the pay of middle-class should be doing just fine.

    I'm sorry but the fundamental reason the dems _let_ someone like Bush gain power was this sentament of 'the shortcomings of me are someone elses fault'.

    "I say we keep 32 bit processors and continue to push the technology forward until 64 bit CPU's are cheap..."

    50USD doesn't seem bad for 64-bit support.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116040

  • Joseph
    5 years ago
    Jul 23, 2007

    >Maybe the real reason Leopard got delayed was that Apple's employees were too busy ridiculing Microsoft on Windows forums.

    Good stuff! Or Leopard was delayed a few months to put out a product line that will add another 33% to 50% of current revenues to Apples bottom line.

    >... I wonder how some of the people who comment on this site still have jobs.

    God knows and she wonders about this. Some of the comments on this site make for easy reporting to upper management.

    Now that Y2K has passed and the HIPAA rollout is 3+ years under way, many are asking if the extra funding given to IT for these projects is any longer necessary, and if so to what extent?

    The other question coming to the surface is IT meeting the demands of its end users/company vs ITs policy.

    Vista (sp1)













    Vista (sp1)

  • Shravan
    5 years ago
    Jul 23, 2007

    Maybe the real reason Leopard got delayed was that Apple's employees were too busy ridiculing Microsoft on Windows forums.

    By the way, just a thought - if creating podcasts and videos was so easy on Macs, I wonder how some of the people who comment on this site still have jobs.

  • Lotsa
    5 years ago
    Jul 23, 2007

    "I'm curious to see how all the mistakes Microsoft made with Vista will play out with Windows 7."

    I'm sure they'll expand on those mistakes with "Windows 7" in much the same way they did with Vista vis-à-vis XP.

  • MysterMask
    5 years ago
    Jul 23, 2007

    http://www.noooxml.org/

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.