Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
July 23, 2008 12:00 AM

Microsoft Prepping Vista Ad Campaign

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #99834
Rating: (17)

A year and a half after it first started selling Windows Vista, Microsoft is prepping a multi-million dollar ad campaign aimed at dispensing lingering doubts about the operating system. The campaign will tackle inaccuracies flaunted by Apple's infamous "I'm a Mac, I'm a PC" ad campaign as well as the widely publicized if under-educated opinions of online tech pundits.

The theme of the campaign is simple enough: Everything you've heard about Vista is wrong. And Microsoft has evidence to back up that claim, not the least of which is over 180 million licenses sold, a blockbuster number that, combined with recent PC sales figures, suggests new Vista users are coming onboard this year at a rate over 12 times faster than, say, are users of Apple's Mac OS X. And that was happening before Microsoft stopped selling Windows XP, so you can put that hand down now, Mr. Doubter.

But Vista's viability isn't tied to just sales numbers. After all, best selling products are frequently inferior to the competition. According to Microsoft, while "a few" users were disappointed by their early experiences with Windows Vista in early 2007, the company has made massive improvements to the OS since then. The Vista experience today, Microsoft says, is far superior.

The company highlights three areas of confusion.

Compatibility. Despite misguided reports and blog posts about Vista's compatibility issues, the truth is that Vista is hugely compatible with hardware and software today. The product supports nearly 77,000 hardware devices (double the number supported at launch) and runs 98 of the top 100 consumer software applications. Over 2700 applications are certified to run on Windows Vista.

Windows XP. Many have complained that Vista is just a prettier version of XP and doesn't offer much incentive to upgrade. Sure, XP is a great OS, and Microsoft says it's proud so many have embraced it. But the company points to Vista benefits like better security, faster and better searching, new and enhanced digital media tools (Windows Photo Gallery, Windows Media Center, Windows Movie Maker), new productivity tools (Windows Mobility Center, Windows Meeting Space, and Sync Center), integrated parental controls, pervasive PC and document backup functionality, hard disk encryption capabilities, and, yes, it's gorgeous new user interface as Vista-exclusive abilities that differentiate its latest OS from XP.

Performance. Despite reports that Vista is outperformed by XP on the same hardware, Microsoft can point to independent performance tests proving that Vista with Service Pack 1 (SP1) actually performs nearly identically to XP. In cases were XP continues to outperform Vista, Microsoft says that Vista is simply doing more on your behalf, securing your system against attack, indexing files for easier searching, and the like. But Vista also offers better power management functionality than does XP, a key concern these days. The notion here is that while the performance differences are negligible in day to day use, Vista's advantages more than make up for the difference.

While the actual ad campaign is still largely a mystery, here's what we know so far. Microsoft is spending about $300 million to promote its latest OS. It will focus on correcting widespread misconceptions with tag lines like "at one point, everyone thought the Earth was flat too" to put Vista's critics into the proper light. And it will be wide-reaching, with spots online and in more traditional advertising.

"We know a few of you were disappointed by your early encounter [with Vista]," Microsoft admits. "Printers didn't work. Games felt sluggish. You told us -- loudly at times -- that the latest Windows wasn't always living up to your high expectations for a Microsoft product ... Our goal is always to make each new version of Windows better than the last. With Windows Vista, we're convinced we succeeded."

So we'll soon see whether the world is ready to believe the truth about Windows Vista, or whether its competitors and critics will continue to control the conversation.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • subzerohitman721
    4 years ago
    Jul 27, 2008

    Man, people will just make up any BS and find some ignorant tech writer to go with it. Vista works just fine. Since SP 1, I've had ZERO crashes. Vista works just fine. If you can't get it to run right, there's a book called Windows Vista Secrets that might help you out. I hear the 2nd edition will be out later.

    Hoping for the next version of Windows to be different? Sorry. Windows Seven is being written using Vista as the core. Thats right, the next version of Windows is Vista R2. Either way, you'll be using Vista. I just think people need something to complain about.

  • Les
    4 years ago
    Jul 26, 2008

    Having recently installed Vista 64 bit, I agree that it was a bit of a change from Vista 32 bit, but if it is a choice you wish to make, don't whine if you haven't done your research. It doesn't support old 16 bit applications, and requires any software that modifies the kernel to be registered, but it is more secure and if you need to get updated hardware and/or software, at least you know that they are more secure as well.

  • sx4sport@hotmail.com
    4 years ago
    Jul 24, 2008

    Speak for yourself - you sound like a typical crApple add campaign...

    Nice sources: slashdot...

    Ha ha ha...

    Windoze 98 was much faster at everything when XP came out as well (at my expense)...

  • Bill
    4 years ago
    Jul 23, 2008

    Paul, that's 180 million sold "in" to channel - 180 million sitting on retail shelves, loaded on computers not yet sold at retail. Give it a rest.

    Nobody is embracing Vista; nobody loves the "Vista experience."

    Now let's look at those areas of "confusion":


    Vista SP1 is even less compatible
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/23/1730251

    Microsoft Says Vista SP1 Won't Resolve Compatibility Issues
    http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204801084

    Microsoft Says Vista SP1 Blocks Third Party Apps
    http://www.crn.com/software/206801221


    Death match: Windows Vista versus XP
    Does Vista have what it takes to knock XP off the enterprise desktop? Not by our scorecard. Point by point and blow by blow, we offer 10 reasons enterprises can skip Windows Vista and stick with XP
    http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/03/17/12TC-vista-versus-xp_1.html

    Windows XP outshines Vista in benchmarking test
    http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html


    Vista SP1 Performance
    We saw a few notable performance improvements under some conditions as well as significant performance degradations in others
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-9871317-1.html

    Performance Results Mixed with Vista Service Pack 1
    File copying, one of the main performance-related complaints from Vista users, was significantly faster. But other tests showed little improvement and, in two tests, our experience was actually a little better without the service pack installed than with it.
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/142233/performance_results_mixed_with_vista_service_pack_1.html

    Vista SP1 doesn't significantly boost performance, slows down certain tasks
    http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/13/vista-sp1-doesnt-significantly-boost-performance-slows-down-ce/


    Boy I hope Microsoft can clear up the "confusion" with more b.s.

    I hope you're getting a cut of that $300 million ad campaign because your "articles" read like pr pieces.

  • PatriotB6007
    4 years ago
    Jul 23, 2008

    dslovejoy -- "Over 78 running processes right out of the box" ???

    Care to provide us a list? On my Vista test box, there are currently 40 processes running, and the only thing I've done is turn off Sidebar (which subtracts 2 processes), and installed my antivirus app (which adds 3 processes).

    The only way you should be getting 78 is if you bought an OEM PC which came loaded with bloatware -- in which case the blame goes to the OEM, not Microsoft. (No, you can't blame Microsoft for not restricting what OEMs install -- because if Microsoft does this they are breaking antitrust law.)

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.