Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

November 30, 2005 12:00 AM

Microsoft Mulls Canceling Windows Vista Beta 2

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #48613
Rating: (7)

In its manic bid to keep Windows Vista on track despite constant development delays, Microsoft could cancel its eagerly anticipated Beta 2 milestone and simply utilize Community Technical Preview (CTP) releases until Release Candidate 0 (RC0) is ready in March or April 2006. According to my sources, this plan would allow the company to continue plotting the final release of Windows Vista for the third quarter of 2006.

When asked to comment about these plans, however, Microsoft denied that it was canceling Beta 2. "Microsoft is not canceling [Windows Vista] Beta 2," a company representative told me, noting that comments by Amitabh Srivastava, the corporate vice president of Windows Core Operating System Development at Microsoft, made during yesterday's conference call with the press, are relevant to this topic. During that call, Srivastava said that Beta was "less urgent" than before because of the company's new engineering process and early CTP feedback.

Microsoft has now rejiggered the Windows Vista development schedule so many times it's almost comical. But the previous major change, in which Windows Vista Beta 2 was delayed from December 7, 2005 to the end of the year and then until January or February 2006, at least kept all of the products major milestones intact. Now, it's clear that the company feels it can get the feedback it needs with CTP builds, which are released in a more timely nature than major beta builds.

Despite yesterday's conference call, in which Microsoft executives promised that users would see a feature-complete build of Windows Vista by the end of 2005, my sources say the company is internally targeting the February 2006 CTP build as the first that testers will see with all features intact. It's possible that Microsoft TAP (Technology Adoption Program) customers will see a feature complete build of Vista as early as January 2006, however.

What's not known, of course, is how this change will affect the public release of a Windows Vista beta build. Previously, Microsoft had promised to make Windows Vista Beta 2 available to the public for broad testing through a preview program. With that release first delayed significantly and now potentially canceled, it's possible that Microsoft will either make the February 2006 CTP or the RC0 milestone available publicly instead. "The internal schedule is still taking shape as we accelerate the feature complete timetable, so we won't be able to share any insights until early next year around milestones like Beta 2 or a preview program," a Microsoft representative told me today.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Tony
    7 years ago
    Dec 04, 2005

    With WXP_Pro running just fine, and not having had the problems of W2K when it first hit the planet, I'm not sure I'm too bothered about Vista and all the potential driver issues that may/will jump out of the woodwork!

  • Stephen
    7 years ago
    Dec 01, 2005

    Agreed. I don't understand the hostility neither. If computers and computing makes a person hostile perhaps they should consider another profession / job / career where they don't have to work much with computers.

    Windows NT 5.x is a great system and probably will never reach its potential because newer systems will come in [e.g. Windows Vista] long before it is able to.

    Anyway, it's not like Microsoft owes the world another OS yet. Since 1995 there's been, depending on how one reckons, around twenty versions of Windows let loose on the consuming public.

    So, what, then, is the bloody rush? It'll get here soon enough [and those screeching loudest will probably be bored of it three days after installing it].

  • Preston
    7 years ago
    Dec 01, 2005

    With the trainwreck that has been Vista's development, I wonder if anyone high up will finally be held accountable? Probably not.

  • Mike
    7 years ago
    Dec 01, 2005

    Dear lollers. What significant importance do DVD requests have on Microsoft maintaining or canceling Beta 2? And by the way, try not to be quite so hostile.

    Anyway, I think if Microsoft is getting hung up using traditional milestone names, then just use CTPs as incremental milestones and forget Betas and RCs. Just work on getting WinVista released before it becomes more obsolete and bested by free or inexpensive third party apps that work well in WinXP.

  • lol
    7 years ago
    Nov 30, 2005

    They already took DVD requests for Beta 2. They won't cancel Beta 2 in your wildest dreams, smart one.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.