Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

September 06, 2005 12:00 AM

Microsoft CEO Threatens to Kill Google

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #47587
Rating: (87)

While being deposed in a Microsoft lawsuit against Google, former Microsoft executive and Windows NT architect Mark Lucovsky stated that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer threatened to "kill" Google when he learned that Lucovsky was leaving Microsoft to join Google. Ballmer allegedly made the threat during a chair-throwing tirade in which he also threatened Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Ballmer denies that it happened that way, however.
  
According to Lucovsky, when he informed Ballmer last year that he was leaving Microsoft, Ballmer asked him whether he was leaving to join Google. When Lucovsky said that he was, the famously volatile Ballmer picked up a chair in his office and hurled it at the wall. "I'm going to [expletive deleted] bury [Schmidt]," Ballmer said. "I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to [expletive deleted] kill Google." Schmidt was formerly an executive at Novell and Sun Microsystems--two companies that were, indeed, adversely affected by Microsoft's market success.
  
Ballmer has categorized Lucovsky's recollection of the meeting as "a gross exaggeration of what actually took place. Mark's decision to leave was disappointing, and I urged him strongly to change his mind," Ballmer said. "But his characterization of that meeting is not accurate." Lucovsky was a Distinguished Engineer and Windows Server Architect at Microsoft. As I noted in "Windows Server 2003: The Road To Gold Part One: The Early Years" (see the URL below), he joined Microsoft with the original wave of ex-Digital Equipment employees who accompanied NT architect Dave Cutler. Lucovsky was widely regarded at Microsoft for his technical acumen and is one of the most impressive people I've ever met.
   
The deposition came to light because of a recent lawsuit over ex-Microsoft researcher Kai-Fu Lee, who left the software giant earlier this year to join Google. Microsoft sued Google over the hire, citing Lee's employment agreement, which specified that he couldn't work for a direct Microsoft competitor for at least 1 year after leaving the company. Despite its posturing, recently revealed documents indicate that Google was aware of the agreement and, in the event of a Microsoft lawsuit, had made contingency plans to keep Lee on paid leave until he could begin working for Google. Microsoft also alleges that Lee sent Google some confidential Microsoft information before he left the company.
  
Ballmer's alleged behavior harkens back to Microsoft's US antitrust lawsuit, during which similar exchanges between various Microsoft executives were detailed. However, it's important to point out that Ballmer never threatened to actually break the law to "bury" or "kill" Schmidt or Google. Microsoft shareholders should be happy that the company's CEO is that aggressively competitive. Arguably, they should expect no less.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Sep 09, 2005

    I guess I do. In early 1996, I first bought the full retail version of Windows 95. Subsequently, I bought retail 'upgrade' versions of Windows 98 [1], Me [2], 2000 [1], and XP Home [2]. I also bought an OEM version of Windows XP Professional, and purchased several computers with Windows pre-installed. Last year, I went and bought an MSDN subscription which includes developer licenses for most every rtm version of Windows.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Sep 08, 2005

    who pays for Windows anyway?

    I've got a copy of a copy of a copy of a pirated copy that one of my friends gave me and is on 100+ computers...

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Sep 08, 2005

    Hey!!! WinXP Pro? 250? OSX 94?

    Download Fedora!! 0$
    Beats OSX and XPPRO in 98% of the features.

    Xp Sucks, OSX crashs. PURE linux is the way

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Sep 08, 2005

    Apple is definately the successor in the cpu arena! hands down. and if you didnt know, your just plain stupid.

  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Sep 08, 2005

    For every 1 Windows release there are at least 2-3 apple releases.
    You ******* trolls, stop posting on non relative issues.

    On topic, if another company was buying my employees, especially those with access to sensative information, I would be ****** off also. I would probably throw the chair at the person quiting not the wall.

    That being said, Linux Rulez

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.