Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

November 02, 2006 12:00 AM

Microsoft Announces Business Launch for Vista, Office, Exchange

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #94105
Rating: (21)

Microsoft will officially launch its business versions of Windows Vista, Microsoft Office 2007 System, and Exchange Server 2007 at a special New Day for Business press conference in New York City on November 30, the software maker confirmed yesterday. A separate and larger consumer launch event for Vista and Office 2007 is expected sometime in January, but Microsoft has yet to confirm the date or location.

Details of the business launch--which will include all Exchange 2007 versions but only volume-license versions of Vista and Office 2007--accompanied the electronic invitation to the press conference. Microsoft had promised that it would launch the volume-license versions of Vista in November 2006 or "by the end of the year," depending on who was speaking. The timing of the business-launch event meets both schedules.

Microsoft will host the event at the NASDAQ Stock Market and the nearby New York Marriott Marquis Hotel. Microsoft and partners such as AMD, Dell, HP, Intel, and Lenovo will meet with the press to discuss their plans for Vista, Office 2007, and Exchange 2007. Oddly, the New York event won't be the first to trumpet the new releases: Microsoft is hosting a separate New Day for Business event in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada a week earlier, on November 23. However, Microsoft says the New York event is the official launch.

I'll be attending the New Day for Business event in New York City and will file a report after the press conference.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Dave
    6 years ago
    Nov 03, 2006

    @Preseton
    "For some reason, you think repeating over and over that this was known a year ago (yes, we're all aware of that) somehow changes the fact that it's a fake RTM."

    For some reason, you don't answer my question. I can only assume you don't have one except to be negative.

  • Mark
    6 years ago
    Nov 03, 2006

    Apple is a successful company...MS is more successful. If not so, then why is Bill Gates the richest man in the world. Now, when you try to say its not about the money...WRONG...that's exactly what its about. Thats like so many young kids saying that "such and such" a band was great, then they went too commercial. I used to think that way, then I grew up. All of those bands that go commercial...that was thier goal. To make a living!!! The same is true for Apple, MS, and all other companies...otherwise, why do it???

    vandil2/bonch/preseton/vandil/sybil -- eventually, you'll grow up and realize this too....until then, keep on worshiping Mr. Jobs and demonizing Mr. Gates...its the popular thing to do!!!

    --tayme

  • Will
    6 years ago
    Nov 03, 2006

    "The Mac Pro and the MacBook Pro are thousands less than their Dell counterparts."

    Thousands? Show me. Computers shouldn't have a price delta in the thousands when they only cost thousands. Your unbacked implication is somewhere in the neighborhood of saying a MacPro costs half as much as a Dell that performs equally.

    Alas this isn't the case. The truth is Apple has finally gotten a few reasonable figures for their bottom of the barrel configurations on the 'Pro' Line. However, if you configure a more meaty system, the price mushrooms while the performance does not.

    For instance, the true top-of-the-line MacPro costs over 30,000USD. Would you like to know why? Overinflated RAM prices mixed with even worse inflation in the HDD arena. There is no way in the world a standard-cooled, 2 processor, 16GB machine should cost that much.

    You can build much higher-performance configurations for half as much. I point you to Hexus.net for counterexamples.

    Luxury cars include modifications that are 'non-standard'.

    Apple will not let you open a iMac without voiding the warranty. How is that for customization? Even Dell lets you switch your own hardware while giving you support.

    You point people to IBM saying they are the crowning example of industry failure due to 'fatcat syndrome' yet they made your processors for over a decade and currently are one of the leading semiconductor research groups in the world. They are about as dead as a newborn baby.

    Apple doesn't seem to want to be a market leader anyway. There was actually genuine interest in porting OSX to real PCs after the switch to "modern CPUs" ala x86. Apple squished this, they didn't want their baby going out for a walk on its own, it could get hurt.

    So after suing independent developers into the ground, Apple released a blanket statement that absolutely no-one outside of itself was allowed to fiddle with OSX period. Wow... loverly developers. And MS is legally forced to give Vista's kernel out.

  • Preston
    6 years ago
    Nov 02, 2006

    @jersey72:

    "And the fact that BMW is one of the more expensive auto manufacturers on the market has nothing to do with lower numbers?"

    Well, it's more expensive because it's a higher-quality automobile built with higher-quality materials. Having said that, even Apple has been competing with Dell's prices surprisingly well in the last few months. The Mac Pro and the MacBook Pro are thousands less than their Dell counterparts. I think this explains the recent upsurge in Mac sales, particularly among college students. Not to mention that Apple's hardware is simply gorgeous.

    My point was that PC users like to mock the Mac for its small market share, which is weird compared to the automobile market where people don't mock BMW for their small market share. In fact, they're considered a successful company with excellent automobiles.

    By its nature, Windows is a lowest common denominator OS. There will always be faster competitors with luxury features that Microsoft doesn't have. Some people seem to believe the fact Microsoft is so big means they're doing well. On the contrary, the company is struggling with a myriad of major issues leading to its eventual irrelevance in several key markets, just like IBM in the early 1980s. People who don't learn from history's mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

  • Chris
    6 years ago
    Nov 02, 2006

    @Preseton/bonch

    "Now, if you're talking about quantity, of course it will be higher for Windows. Just like BMW has a smaller segment of the market but is considered one of the best brands of car."

    And the fact that BMW is one of the more expensive auto manufacturers on the market has nothing to do with lower numbers?

    Miata starts at $21,000. Z4 starts at $35,600. Miata outsells Z4 because of the $14,600 price difference.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.