Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
November 02, 2006 12:00 AM

Microsoft Adjusts Windows Vista License

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #94117
Rating: (30)

In response to complaints from users that the new Windows Vista End User License Agreement was too restrictive, Microsoft announced on Thursday that it would change the license. The new license wording is now more similar to that of Windows XP, which appeared to be less restrictive.

Previously, the Vista EULA had stated that customers who purchased a retail version of the product could reassign the software "to another device one time." Now, the license reads as follows: "You may uninstall the software and install it on another device for your use. You may not do so to share this license between devices."

In a briefing earlier today, Microsoft told me that the new wording means that a user can reassign a single retail version of Windows Vista as often as they like. That is, they can move a single copy of Vista from machine to machine indefinitely as long as they always uninstall the previous installation. Microsoft says that the change should address complaints from the enthusiast community while protecting the company from piracy.

Last month, Microsoft's new Vista license was the subject of much debate, as online pundits and reporters speculated about the meaning of the original EULA changes. But Microsoft says it never intended to restrict users and was only clarifying a vague clause of the previous Windows license. It also argued--and continues to argue--that this clause of the Vista EULA applies to only a tiny minority of users. Most Windows users will obtain Vista with a new PC, and those licenses cannot be transferred under any circumstances. And of those users who do purchase Windows at retail, only a very small fraction ever attempt to transfer Windows to a second PC.

"This policy will change will affect a small number of customers, but we are optimistic that this change strikes the right balance for our retail customers," a Microsoft representative told me. "This change to give hardware enthusiasts the latitude to upgrade their PCs or reassign their license to a new PC, while still making clear our intentions to protect our software from piracy."

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • octaglider
    6 years ago
    Nov 05, 2006

    Yes, well done Microsoft. I'm more than happy to support proper anti-piracy moves and this willingness to listen means I'll pre-order Vista (hopefully Ultimate) retail as I did with XP.

  • R2
    6 years ago
    Nov 04, 2006

    Please.....I have been through all the protocols of validation and know all about recovery partitions and so on. Microsoft flat out rendered my two Media Center machines non valid...that is the bottom line....and I don't need their products period....their poor quality software does nothing other than to help me produce low quality products....which is why I now use Linux and why what I produce and engineer is of a much higher quality as well as much more reliable.....it's a fact you Micorsoft huggers can't seem to admit.....this isn't personal...it's simply fact....

  • Joe
    6 years ago
    Nov 04, 2006

    treeorc: Did you reinstall from media other than the HP supplied media? Your serial number only works with the supplied media. A common mistake is that people with name brand machines think that they can use other media to reinstall their O/S which is not correct. Some even think that they can use a standard OEM System Builder copy of Windows with their OEM Name Brand system - also not correct. "Direct OEM's" (as Microsoft calls major manufacturers that buy directly from them) have special product keys that don't work with generic OEM copies. If your HP system came with a recovery partition that you wiped out when you reformatted the drive, then you'd have to contact HP for proper recovery or reinstallation discs. They usually only charge about $15 for shipping them. Blame them for not providing the media in the first place though. I hate recovery partitions when that's all the manufacturer provides. If they use a recovery partition, they should also give you a physical CD or DVD too.

    BTW: OpenOffice is nothing like Microsoft Office. It's more like Works than anything else.

  • William
    6 years ago
    Nov 04, 2006

    err, from above, I meant the Task Manager present in Fedora Core 3, not the terminal window...

    "The spell-checking is systemwide for all text input fields"

    Neat.

  • William
    6 years ago
    Nov 04, 2006

    "pend two weeks with Linux and you'll never go back to the clunk of Windows.....and try the Ubuntu Linux Live CD if you want to get a feel first...."

    I run Linux on the weekends. For some reason I chose Ubuntu as the distro, which I am regretting given it's performance compared to XP PRO SP2 on this machine (667mhz, 193MB RAM; Yeah, it's old). Where is a task manager, by the way? I don't like having to go into a terminal session (like the one present that was present in Fedora Core 3), type "ps -A" and then "kill -9 [pid]" to kill those wonderful "let's eat up all them yummy clock cycles" processes. Where's my Undo operation when I accidentally move or delete something in Nautilus? Where's the right-click menu with "Move Here" and "Copy Here"? Why doesn't it show the address bar instead of the clunky button breadcrumbs thing by default?

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.