Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
January 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Have Fun Purchasing Vista

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #95040
Rating: (57)

When I learned that Microsoft would sell an unprecedented number of Windows Vista product versions, I questioned the reasoning behind the company's decision. I felt that consumers would be confused by the myriad of options available and that the diversification of the Windows product line would cause support headaches.

Clearly, I suffer from a lack of imagination; the situation is much worse than I ever thought it could be now that Vista is widely available. Simply counting the number of Vista versions Microsoft is currently selling is futile. There's Vista Starter, Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, Vista Enterprise, and Vista Ultimate. But there are also the so-called N versions of Vista Home Premium and Vista Business in the European Union (where, I believe, N stands for "no one is interested"). There are separate Upgrade and full versions of Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium (and Vista Home Premium N), Vista Business (and Vista Business N), and Vista Ultimate. And although Vista Ultimate includes both 32-bit and 64-bit media in the retail box, Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, and Vista Business all ship in separate 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Are there separate 32-bit and 64-bit Upgrade and full versions of these products? You know, I'm not sure.

Businesses, by the way, qualify for volume licensing. There are numerous prices, and it's always cheaper if Microsoft can convince you to buy Vista right away. Volume-license customers qualify for their own versions of Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, Vista Enterprise, and Vista Ultimate. Vista Enterprise has one almost assuredly useless but unique feature: You can install as many as four more copies of Vista Enterprise on virtual machines. There's just one hitch: All the copies have to be running on the same PC that's running the first Vista version you bought.

And let's talk about OEM versions for a bit. Online retailers are selling low-cost OEM versions of Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate. These products are identical to the full retail versions of Vista, but they come without documentation, retail packaging, support, and, as it turns out, the humongous price tags. Smart buyers are snapping up the OEM versions before Microsoft realizes there's a loophole allowing these products--which are legally available only to system builders--to be sold to individuals.

OEM versions aren't the only surreptitious way to get more than you paid for. According to my sources, you can purchase a retail Upgrade version of Vista and perform a pseudo-clean install, without having to have a previous version of Windows. It's a handy way to save money if you don't mind cheating a bit. I wonder if Microsoft will cut that off when Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) ships later this year. (You know ... the Vista SP1 that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer embarrassingly continues to deny is in the works.)

But wait, there's more. Consumers who purchase new PCs online can get Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, or Vista Ultimate with their systems by choosing which version they want at configuration time. If you purchase an XP-based PC before March 15, you can get a free or low-cost version of Vista Home Basic or Vista Home Premium via your PC maker, depending on the version of XP you bought. And if you got stuck with a low-end Vista version for some reason, take heart: You can use Windows Anytime Upgrade to upgrade electronically from Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, and Vista Business to better versions. Take your time: The upgrades will be available whenever you're ready.

If you buy the full retail version of Vista Ultimate, you qualify for Microsoft's Windows Vista Family Discount program, which lets you electronically purchase two additional licenses for Vista Home Premium for just $50 each. Are these full versions of Vista Home Premium, or are they Upgrade versions? No one knows yet, because Microsoft's Web site hasn't been fulfilling requests for the past 24 hours and its support center has no idea when users call. I'm sure that will get sorted out eventually.

There's more. Oh yes, there's always more, because Microsoft is being particularly inventive about taking your money this time around. If you're too lazy to actually get off your couch and drive to Best Buy, Microsoft will sell you full and Upgrade versions of Vista Home Basic, Vista Home Premium, Vista Business, and Vista Ultimate via its Windows Marketplace Web site. I fully expect Vista to be included in cereal boxes, given out with new car purchases, and sold by street vendors in in New York by the end of the year. Come to think of it, the latter might already be a reality.

My favorite part of this chaotic silliness is the myriad ways in which you can start from a bare PC and work up to a Vista Ultimate powerhouse. Consider this scenario: You purchased a new PC in late 2006 with XP Home Edition. Using the Vista Express Upgrade program, you receive your free copy of Vista Home Basic in early 2007 and use it to upgrade your PC. Later, you decide that you want more functionality, so you use Windows Anytime Upgrade to upgrade to Vista Home Premium. Later, you can use the same service to upgrade to Vista Ultimate. In this scenario, Microsoft got paid three times (once for XP, twice for Vista), and you probably had to upgrade your RAM and video card as well. In short, the whole PC industry benefits. My question is, once you upgrade to Vista Ultimate, do you qualify for family licensing? Of course not.

Am I forgetting something? Probably. Because if there's a single truth about the new Windows version, it's that Microsoft will stop at nothing to ensure that you get the copy of Vista you so richly deserve. How you do it, and how much money, time, and effort you expend, is completely up to you.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Joe
    5 years ago
    Feb 05, 2007

    "I don't expect the audio to be crackly, and CPU at 100%"

    ?

    mine's running fine! i can stream 32 audio streams through Cakewalk without capping 20% usage on my Core Duo 1.66GHz notebook. do you have the latest drivers installed??

    XP

  • Will
    5 years ago
    Feb 05, 2007

    If you want _really_ 'high end' audio, just get the signal out of your PC as fast as you can, keeping it in the digital domain for as much of the trip as you can. Then you can take the signal to a nice h/a amplifier and do whatever you need to do from there.

    I'm not saying X-Fi is sub-par, but Creative dropped the ball on the vista drivers. I'd expect certain features to not work, but I don't expect the audio to be crackly, and CPU at 100%.

    The main problem with X-Fi and other PC audio devices is the output terminations. My speakers use 8GA dual-conductor wire... I havn't seen any PC audio device that has a termination that fits that heh.

    @Nate
    Thanks for info on UAC... and yeah, I had resolved myself about the SPDIF stuff earlier, MS's response of supported-but-not-default is acceptable. It still does pain me that I've got 600US of viewsonic monitors that don't support HDCP though. But it is true, no OS will run a HDDVD/BluRay signal through a non HDCP line.

  • Joe
    5 years ago
    Feb 04, 2007

    actually, with the SNR that the Audigy 2 ZS and X-Fi series produce, they make a very cost-effective alternative to some of the over-priced professional cards. plus the fact that they have ASIO driver support makes them a welcome addition to any inexpensive PC studio setup. there used to be an Audigy 4 Pro with an external breakout box, albeit it likely meant "pro-sumer" and not "professional", but it did have higher quality codecs than the Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Pro, which had very similar features. likely the X-Fi Elite Pro has usurped it's position as the highest quality consumer card. the processing horsepower of the X-Fi chip makes a huge world of difference when dealing with an ungodly number of audio streams in real-time.

    don't forget that Creative also has their E-MU line of cards and devices. they're pretty nice, and i've worked with some of them before in Cubase VST and Cakewalk Sonar. they're often overlooked in the marketplace. i like what they offer for the price, over the cost-inflated M-Audio products.

    so far for me, the X-Fi beta drivers that Creative currently has are working good for general use. they are much better than the previous ones anyway. my gaming experience hasn't changed at all from XP either. i don't see any speed impact from switching to Vista, and game benchmarks seems to be at least on par. something i did notice was my 3DMark05 score has actually risen some, but i haven't run it for 6 months or so, and that could just be for the fact that i didn't have the same video drivers back then. my hardware didn't change tho.

    XP

  • R2
    5 years ago
    Feb 03, 2007

    Creatrive works fine for home recording, gaming, etcetera; and produces a decent surround spectrum.......but for professional recording of high calibur at the digital and even analog levels, one would need to go way beyond their product......oh and by the way, the Creative software I run on my Media Center doesn't use that much of the system......when testing Vista I had a lot of problems with Creative though.....

  • Stick
    5 years ago
    Feb 02, 2007

    "The prominent first-level "Ultimate Extras" shortcut in "Computer" will just sit there and mock Ultimate owners for the next 5 years. LOL."

    They should sh*tcan the Ultimate Extras altogether. I mean the Plus Packs of the past have been nothing but a waste of time and so far the Ultimate Extras are living up to that legacy.

    Chuggy video desktop? Texas Hold Em? A photo editor/organizer that should have been wrapped up in Windows Photo Gallery? Whooo!!! Hold me back!!

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.