Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 11, 2010 12:00 AM

Google Jumps Into Social Networking Fray (Again)

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103575
Rating: (6)

While competitors like Microsoft and Yahoo! have elected to partner surging social networking heavyweights like Twitter and Facebook, online giant Google this week jumped into the market with a Gmail-based entry called Buzz. But this isn't the first time Google has tried its hand at social networking. Its previous attempt, Orkut, was an abject failure.

This time, Google is playing it safe. Instead of delivering Buzz as a standalone service and website, the company has instead integrated it into its Gmail web-based email solution. This provides Buzz with an immediate audience—Google claims about 150 million Gmail users at last count—and makes it more difficult to determine how popular the service becomes.

Buzz is aimed squarely at the current social networking champions, though each of those seem to be popular for different reasons. Facebook is positioning itself as the central meet-up point between people and their real-world contacts and would prefer for users to access the service from its own website or custom apps. Twitter, meanwhile, is a disparate self-broadcasting service with no real central "place" to meet; while there is a Twitter website, many users access the service from a wide variety of third-party solutions or receive Twitter feeds in other ways.

Buzz sits firmly in the middle of these two services, I suppose. It provides a way to broadcast information to followers, like Twitter. But for now it's only accessible via Gmail, and in that sense it's centralized like Facebook.

In light testing yesterday I found Buzz to be immediately familiar, as it works much like Twitter or Facebook. But I suspect that many people will have the same reaction I did, which is one of social networking fatigue. Enough already: Even the shameless self-promoters who live via their Twitter feeds must get tired of talking about themselves at some point.

Both Microsoft and Yahoo! have ridiculed Buzz, noting that their own (separate but similar) approaches make more sense for customers. "Busy people don't want another social network," Microsoft said via a prepared statement. "They want the convenience of aggregation. We've done that. Hotmail customers have benefited from Microsoft working with Flickr, Facebook, Twitter, and 75 other partners since 2008."

Yahoo! offers similar aggregation functionality through its Yahoo! Updates service, and it claims an even larger number of partners—200—than Microsoft. "Yahoo! Updates is a social feature that lets people share their status, content, and online activities and stay connected to what their friends and family are doing on Yahoo! and across the web," the company noted. "Yahoo! Updates now appear throughout the Yahoo! network, in popular sites and services like Yahoo! Mail, Yahoo.com, and Yahoo! Messenger."

Whatever the approach, services such as Facebook continue to gain in popularity and outstrip the competition. An estimated 400 million people access Facebook, while Twitter claims 55 million users per month

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Gyp
    2 years ago
    Feb 12, 2010

    & wh0ring your personal nfo...

  • Chris
    2 years ago
    Feb 12, 2010

    I'll wager that while Yahoo and Microsoft are ridiculing Google for adding another social networking tool rather that doing aggregation, Google is very likely busy working on aggregation.

  • Chris
    2 years ago
    Feb 12, 2010

    @John:

    Of those "100m users", how many of those are actually active? I have an Orkut account that I haven't touched in years.

  • Christopher
    2 years ago
    Feb 11, 2010

    "Maybe I'm too old, or don't have the right mindset, but I don't get this "social networking" thing."

    I thought that way too, but I joined facebook during my convalescence and was able to reconnect with lots of old friends... It was quite nice. I think you really need to pick a goal for being involved, and pick a service that is tailored for that goal.

    Facebook seems more useful to stay in touch with family and friends... Twitter -- err, I don't know what it's really good for other than following celebs. MySpace is more like a modern GeoCities. More of a personal home page than evolved social media site. Plus MySpace seems to be the hub for a lot of bands with their music streaming.

    I'm not sure about the others, but they all seem to fill a niche without too much overlap.

  • Scott
    2 years ago
    Feb 11, 2010

    Maybe I'm too old, or don't have the right mindset, but I don't get this "social networking" thing. I just don't want to be that connected.

    Paul, please provide proof when you use phrases like "abject failure". Without proof, these are just opinions.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.