Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
February 25, 2010 12:00 AM

Finally, EU Trains Antitrust Sights on Google

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103646
Rating: (16)

After years of allowing Google to trample intellectual property and privacy laws, antitrust regulators in the European Union (EU) are finally beginning to examine the online giant. And if the EU's experience suing Microsoft was any indication, Google could be in this for the long haul: The company controls seemingly unassailable positions in both online search and online search advertising, allowing it to enter other markets at will.

Its competitors say that Google's advertising monopoly and the income it generates gives the company an unfair advantage. To date, EU regulators have received three complaints against Google and the European Commission announced that it is launching an examination of the online giant's business practices. The Commission has asked Google for a formal response to the charges and will then determine whether to issue formal charges.

The complaints were all made by European companies though one, Ciao.de, is a German subsidiary of Microsoft. The other two are Foundem.co.uk, a UK-based price comparison site and Ejustice.fr, a French legal issues search site.

Google says it will respond to the EU as quickly as possible. "While we will be providing feedback and additional information on these complaints, we are confident that our business operates in the interests of users and partners, as well as in line with European competition law," Google Competition Counsel Julia Holtz said. She also added that "Microsoft is our biggest competitor and that explains many aspects [of this investigation]."

That's a cute sound bite, but I don't believe it's that simple. Google has grown so large so quickly that it can enter new markets at will and maintain money-losing products almost indefinitely. The company makes virtually all of its money on advertising but can leverage those revenues to enter and compete in markets where others cannot. Today, Google offers email, PIM, office productivity, smartphone, and other solutions that compete with the Microsofts and Apples of the world, and it seems to unleash new products and services every week.

Is Google the new Microsoft? Clearly, yes: Its ability to maintain money-losing products thanks to a single monopoly closely mirrors Microsoft's trajectory over the past 15 years. The only difference is that Google rose to power much more quickly than did Microsoft. But with that kind of power, of course, comes closer regulatory scrutiny. I'm only surprised that it took this long, given how aggressive the EU has been with other businesses

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Mushfiq
    2 years ago
    Mar 01, 2010

    I enjoy Google services and products, but even I'm leery of its privacy standards. However, this is such a load of crap, I don't even know where to begin. What is Google being punished for?

    Microsoft was being punished for being predatory, developing secret deals, delaying software innovation, etc. -- in essence, hurting the consumer and the user experience. Google's "trampling" on intellectual property is accidental at best, because everybody is suddenly a Nazi about their "intellectual property". Google is merely attempting to establish the free flow of information since that helps them make money. Their privacy violations are also accidental, at best -- they simply want to provide targeted advertising, so they can make money providing free services. Otherwise, how're they going to keep the lights on and pay for massive amounts of bandwidth?

    How are they hurting the consumer? How are they punishing their technologically inferior competitors, besides providing superior solutions? When competitors, like Bing, come up with better solutions, aren't consumers freely switching with no hindrance?

    Should Google improve its privacy policy? Sure. It just isn't an antitrust issue.

  • Les
    2 years ago
    Feb 26, 2010

    If it wasn't for the EU, there would be no corporate accountability at all. Where are the American corporate regulators ? Those of us in countries around the world (such as me in Australia) that don't have the clout from our own governments, rely on the EU to do the job that no-one else seems willing to do, whether its Microsoft, Google, Apple or Toyota.

  • Dr. Gary
    2 years ago
    Feb 26, 2010

    @ subzerohitman721

    Again, you're wrong. The companies involved in this issue are all Microsoft companies. This is Microsoftism at its worst.

    They cannot innovate, they cannot compete in the online market so let's handle the Microsoft 90s way: we buy up companies.

    No wonder more and more people are starting to dislike Microsoft, because in the last ten years they have been exposed what they really are.

    A no-good software company that can only retain its marketshare by gridlock deals based on obsolete software (windows/office) that they largely copy from others (or even steal: see the Microsoft Word lawsuit) and than can only compete in the new online-world by buying up companies.

    Both their hardware (Xbox) and their software (Vista) sucks big time.

  • subzerohitman721
    2 years ago
    Feb 26, 2010

    This really does not surprise me. The EU is only interested in defending European companies & this just looks like anti-Americanism at it worst. I'm not surprised at chuckb84's comments, since his iShades are always on and they interpret everything.

    My problem here is when the EU finally turns on Apple. Then we'll see guys & gals like chuckb damning the EU and their laws. Trust me, once Apple get's a high enough percentage of European media content market share, high enough percentage of the device market, coincidentally target the kernel panics preventing interoperability with other PC's, and other things, Apple will be in the midst of the EU anti-competition/antitrust regulators.

    Then we'll see these guys change their tune. Just warning you guys in advance when it happens.

  • Dean
    2 years ago
    Feb 25, 2010

    to Chuckb84.. If you every read Pauls Posts you will notice he bags out Microsoft just as much if not more than any other company.. Cet your facts straight and stop wearing the subjective glasses.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.