Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
January 12, 2010 12:00 AM

As Required, Microsoft Pulls Office

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103420
Rating: (8)

To meet the requirements of a court ruling, Microsoft on Monday made its Office productivity suite unavailable to customers from its online store, MSDN and TechNet services, and the Microsoft Download Center (which provided evaluation versions of the software). As you might recall, Microsoft was found to have infringed on an i4i patent in its Word software, which is part of Office. As part of the ruling against it, the software giant was issued an injunction halting sales of the infringing software on January 11.

Microsoft said at the time of the injunction that it would be able to replace existing copies of Word and Office in the marketplace before the January 11 injunction date. Clearly, that hasn't yet happened.

"We've taken steps to comply with the court's ruling, and we're introducing the revised software into the US market," a Microsoft statement reads. "This process will be imperceptible to the vast majority of customers, who will find both trial and purchase options readily available." According to the software giant, the removal is temporary and the software will return to its sites soon.

What Microsoft has done so far is issue software updates for customers already running Word 2003 and 2007. These updates remove the infringing code from the products, taking with them a small, largely unused bit of functionality. Microsoft noted that it is also removing the offending code from its Mac versions of Office 2004 and 2008, even though that software wasn't part of the injunction.

Microsoft has filed another appeal in the i4i case, asking an appellate court to grant a rehearing of the case. "The petition details significant conflicts we believe the December 22 decision creates with established precedents governing trial procedure and the determination of damages, and we are concerned that the decision weakens judges' authority to apply appropriate safeguards in future patent trials," Microsoft says.

Should Microsoft lose this appeal, it can mount a final legal challenge with the US Supreme Court.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Ron
    2 years ago
    Jan 14, 2010

    The real rub here that Paul is ignoring is the fact that the patch / change that Microsoft has released DELETES DATA. It doesn't offer a user the ability to recover this lost data, the data is not made available externally for use in another way, nope just deleted *poof* have a nice day.

    If you have a small company this might not impact you, but the City I work for has about 10,000 desktops and we employ a lot of smart people that push the tools that we give them. Microsoft hasn't even published (that I can find) any documentation on what XML tag(s) are impacted by this lawsuit, so I'm left blind with millions of Office documents potentially at risk for data loss.

    Gray Knowlton of Microsoft has a blog that talks about this issue, but my email exchanges with him have also revealed that there is quite the gag order out there that prevents open and complete disclosure of information with Microsoft's customers as to the full impact of this decision on our files.

    Microsoft may have been reading too much of Paul's writing...believing that they would NEVER loose this court case. It isn't like this is a 0-day system exploit, it is the result of months of court hearings and a KNOWN date for judgement that stretches back months. Yet what we see is that Microsoft is woefully unprepared for this decision and the changes that it requires of Word.

    If Microsoft was willing to argue this case in court, it clearly knew what the issue was, what is impacted within the .DOCX and .DOCM file formats and what options users might have in order to work around a ban should Microsoft loose in court. Had Microsoft truly respected its users it would have been prepared with comprehensive details as to what is impacted, what is changing and how to determine if you as a customer are at risk. Instead, nothing. Silence. Stunned silence perhaps, but no data, no details, no directions and no difinitive answers have been forthcoming on what is one of Microsoft's top products. Shame

  • Ed
    2 years ago
    Jan 13, 2010

    Interesting., Last I checked for TechNet subscriptions, Office 2003 apps were removed in the US but not elsewhere. I can still see them [as of a couple of days ago] and I'm not from the US. The site also updated offending versions of Office 2007 with new releases. [Too bad SP1 & SP2 aren't integrated - or it doesn't say so.]

    Of course it would of been nice if TechNet subscribers were notified.

    @Preseton: Wrong article and I think you need a life.

  • Preston
    2 years ago
    Jan 13, 2010

    Paul refuses to acknowledge that he misled his readers in his "Sorry, Apple" article that trumpeted Kindles outselling iPods on the Amazon sales chart over the holidays. He intentionally left out that Kindles are only available through Amazon.com, funneling all demand through one sales chart and inflating their position even though Kindles were outsold globally.

  • Darrick
    2 years ago
    Jan 12, 2010

    @ yoshipod:

    Microsoft also removed/altered the Office menu and replaced it with the Ribbon. Should we be refunded for that?

    We pay for licenses to use the software and Microsoft or any software company has the right to alter/remove features as they see fit - even if it makes us angry.

  • Chris
    2 years ago
    Jan 12, 2010

    @yoshipod:

    Actually, it's a dangerous precedent by the court to show a complete lack of understanding in regards to technology and how patents should be granted and applied. The concept of "custom XML" is completely redundant - all XML is custom - it's XML's raison d'être.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.