Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
July 16, 2003 12:00 AM

AOL Effectively Kills Netscape, Frees Mozilla

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #39588
Rating: (0)

America Online (AOL) announced Tuesday that it was laying off 50 employees who worked on the Netscape Web browser and reorganizing development of the Mozilla project under which the browser is developed, signaling an end to Netscape and to the company's competition with Microsoft's dominant Internet Explorer. AOL was quick to downplay the news, noting that the developers represented less than 10 percent of Netscape's employees; the company also said that it would continue supporting current Netscape users and the Netscape Web portal. But with development of the core browser suite moving to a new independent foundation called the Mozilla Foundation, it's clear that AOL has finally given up on the browser market.

"Netscape remains a key part of our multibrand strategy," an AOL spokesperson said. "We will continue to support the browser and the portal." Last month, AOL signed a seven-year contract with Microsoft to use IE as the underlying technology in its market leading online software, ending speculation that it would move the product to the Mozilla technology on which the Netscape browser is based. AOL said that was because IE was better technology than its own Mozilla technology, an interesting decision considering recent end-user frustration with Microsoft's now-glacial IE development time.

In related news, AOL is transforming Mozilla.org into a non-profit organization called the Mozilla Foundation, which will oversee development of the Mozilla browser suite products, which consists of a Web browser (code-named Mozilla Firebird), and email and USENET news client (code-named Mozilla Thunderbird), calendar, chat, and HTML editor applications; additionally, hundreds of add-ons and accessory applications are also in the works for various purposes. AOL will donate $2 million to the foundation, and provide it with all of the Mozilla trademarks and logos.

Though AOL purchased Netscape in November 1998 for a whopping (and now obviously ludicrous) $4.2 billion, the actual purchase price was closer to $9 billion thanks to stock price inflation during the Internet bubble. The returns on AOL's investment have been less-than-fruitful for the company, as Netscape completely surrendered control of the browser market to IE and saw its share of the Web portal market fall to companies such as Yahoo, MSN, and the Google search engine. Netscape developers and a group of open source volunteers squandered any momentum they might have had when Netscape opened up the Mozilla source code, taking over five years to come to market. Today, despite constant improvements, Mozilla products barely register on Web browser market share surveys. Recently, Mozilla also saw its technology passed by when Apple decided to use a different browser technology for its popular (and arguably superior) Safari product. Mozilla was further embarrassed by an attempt to wrest the "Firebird" name and trademark away from an open source database project that had used it for years; despite claims by numerous Mozilla.org coders that they owned the name, the organization later quietly backed off and began referring to its browser as Mozilla Firebird instead.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Atomic Bomb
    9 years ago
    Jul 21, 2003

    This article was a nice trip down memory lane. I opened good ol' IE 6 just for giggles after reading it. Since all my Wintel machines are using Mozilla's Firebird browser, and my Macs only use Safari, I haven't had the IE "experience" in quite some time. Bye, bye, IE... 'twas nice to know you.

    Regarding poorly designed sites that don't render properly on non-IE browsers, I have a great solution - don't visit them. That's not always very easy, since I know that several on-line banking sites render incorrectly on Mozilla browsers and in Safari. Thankfully that is not the case for me.


    Editor's note: Yep. I use Firebird on the PC and Safari on Mac OS X as well (God, I'd love to see a Windows Safari). I only use IE when I have to, and that's become less and less frequently these days. --Paul

  • ragingmime
    9 years ago
    Jul 20, 2003

    "Recently, Mozilla also saw its technology passed by when Apple decided to use a different browser technology for its popular (and arguably superior) Safari product."
    Um... isn't safari based off of Gecko, the Mozilla rendering engine?

    "AOL will donate $2 million to the foundation"
    "it's clear that AOL has finally given up on the browser market"
    That seems like kind of a contradition... maybe AOL is tightening its belt a little, but it's not abandoning Netscape by any means if it's donating that kind of money and keeping... let's see... 9 times 50... 450 employees at Netscape.

    "AOL signed a seven-year contract with Microsoft to use IE as the underlying technology in its market leading online software, ending speculation that it would move the product to the Mozilla technology on which the Netscape browser is based."
    True... although Mozilla is used in the Mac version of AOL and in on AOL-owned Compuserve.

    It is true that IE is the dominant browser right now, and I was disappointed with AOL's move to use IE in AOL for Windows, but this article is taking things way too far. And don't forget that IE is no longer being developed for Mac, and that there *is* no IE for Linux. Netscape's future doesn't look to bad, in my opinion.


    Editor's note: Safari is based on KHTML, not Gecko. AOL is abandoning the browser market and setting Mozilla free. Many of the remaining Netscape employees will have to find work elsewhere in the company, are there temporarily, or work on non-browser products (i.e. the Web portal). What AOL does going forward on the Mac is unclear, but IE technology continues in MSN 8 for the Mac. There's no demand for IE (or AOL) on Linux. --Paul

  • peter.williams@c7solutions.com
    9 years ago
    Jul 18, 2003

    OK, for those that complain about IE's lack of features, how about getting the best of both worlds? Since IE is modular (the main reason AOL chose IE over Navigator way back when, conveniently forgotten by most ABMers), it's possible to create a "wrapper" application that uses the IE rendering engine but adds it's own features. So you get the IE compatibility, with all the latest trimmings. Won't it be nice to have tabbed browsing, grouped favorites, mouse gestures, popup and add blocker, amongst other features? Don't you wish something like that existed? Well, it does. Find it here:

    http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

    I have been using MyIE2 for a while now and going back to the "regular" IE is now a pain for me! So, go get it!!

    And no, I don't have any connection with MyIE2, I just think it is a wonderful program that solves all the issues people complain about of IE.

    Peter

  • T. Raines
    9 years ago
    Jul 17, 2003

    Paul do you ever reply back to your mail? I asked for a link to an archived article where you had some tips about XP's QoS Packet Scheduler. Mind posting it here if you're too lazy to click on Reply?

  • Joshua Heslinga
    9 years ago
    Jul 17, 2003

    I absolutely agree with you on this one, Paul. A couple of years ago, I was a big IE fan, but then nothing's happened! Opera (and/or Mozilla / Safari) now has superior features, and I prefer it, but the problem is that companies on the web write all their code for IE, so you encounter compatibility problems. (Not to mention that Microsoft writes its own considerable content so that it appears worse in other browsers.)

    As much as I like software standardization, the standard needs to be a good one for it to be a net positive. IE's relative quality is sinking fast, in my opinion. It's sad that Microsoft has gotten to the point where they've simply said "it's good/dominant enough" and stopped developing IE.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.