Subscribe to Windows IT Pro

 

Get Newsletters

  • Get the Latest News
  • Product Updates
  • Helpful Tricks
  • Productivity Tips

Subscribe Now!

October 21, 2002 12:00 AM

Microsoft Palladium

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #26712
Rating: (3)

Palladium may be the most misunderstood project Microsoft has ever devised. Maybe that's because the company divulged information about it more than 3 years before it will see the light of day. What is Palladium, and why should you be thinking about it now?

Palladium is Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing initiative made real—a hardware/software solution that will form the basis of next-generation computer systems. Microsoft intends Palladium to protect user privacy and present a secure environment for sensitive data. Here's what you need to know about Palladium.

Part of Longhorn
Essentially a new computing platform for security, personal privacy, and system integrity, Palladium is due to ship in 2005 as part of Longhorn, the next Windows version. But Palladium isn't just software: It will require a new type of PC with a specially designed microprocessor—Intel and AMD are on board—and security chipset. Palladium will also be optional: Users who want to load Longhorn on a non-Palladium PC can do so—and forgo Palladium's benefits.

But make no mistake: Palladium is an all-new PC architecture. And if Palladium is successful, the PC as we know it will disappear. Post-Longhorn, Palladium could easily become a requirement for future Windows versions.

A Secure PC Environment
As the agent of Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing initiative, Palladium will create a secure execution space on a PC or other Palladium-compatible device. This runtime environment encompasses three areas of integrity: machine integrity, data integrity, and user integrity. Machine integrity requires the underlying hardware to meet Palladium's standards. Data integrity uses Digital Rights Management (DRM) to protect crucial software systems and associated data, such as email. User integrity incorporates OS-type security, such as logons, smart cards, and other forms of authentication.

This three-tiered approach has two interesting—and often misunderstood—results. First, because Palladium directly handles only machine and data integrity, it requires an underlying OS to provide a complete solution, and this OS needn't be Windows—or even supplied by Microsoft. Second, Palladium essentially moves attacks and other electronic threats from the software application and OS levels down to the hardware. In this sense, Palladium is bigger than Windows or any other OS.

Digital Identity Protection
Cast aside any comparisons to Microsoft .NET Passport, Microsoft's current online identity service. With Palladium, the company is taking a different approach to creating, managing, and protecting a digital identity. Instead of using a centralized server as .NET Passport does, Palladium puts control in users' hands.

The goal is to protect users from identity masquerades and theft by providing an architecture that enables user identities to be uniquely verified. So, for example, you'll be able to securely transmit credit card transactions online or send an email message and be sure that only the intended recipient can access the enclosed data.

The Chipset Is the Key
Combining a Palladium-compatible OS such as Longhorn with Palladium-specific hardware creates a special microkernel-like environment, called the Trusted Operating Root (TOR), that can instantiate the Palladium software. As the software loads, it sets aside a secure, or trusted, processing environment called the vault within the hardware chipset. Data in the vault is physically isolated, protected, and not accessible to other applications and services on the PC. Only users, processes, services, applications, other computers, or other entities that can be verified as trustworthy can access the vault's data. Microsoft says that hardware channels inside Palladium-based PCs will be "impervious to snooping, hardware/software-based attacks, and masquerading or impersonating on the screen."

Recommendations
Palladium isn't happening this year, next year, or even the year after that. So, you have time to plan for the future—and, of course, suffer from the malicious attacks that Palladium intends to obviate. Will Palladium deliver on its promises, or is it doomed to be another far-reaching Microsoft initiative that doesn't live up to its hype? Time will tell, and we've certainly got plenty of that.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Anonymous User
    7 years ago
    Feb 06, 2005

    Right off the bat, know that Paul Thurrott is a well-known mouthpiece for Microsoft. His own site pretends to be a Windows consumer information site, but acts as nothing more than Gates' Promotion Dept. Therefore, if Paul writes that any MS product is "good" for users then assume it's bad; "efficient" means it's overdesigned and slow; "great" or "excellent" mean it's mediocre at best. Conversely, his declaring a product to be "average" or "typical" indicates poor performance or lagging behind the competition.

    Palladium technology might well be the light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel for users, though. But not in the way MS desires: it might provide the incentive for many users to finally break free of MS arrogance and tyranny and try alternatives more respectful of users, like ever-reliable Mac systems or various other PC OSs.

  • Cesarino Ramirez
    9 years ago
    Nov 16, 2003

    Well, it'll be time for a VIA Cyrix Processor and Mandrake Linux for me, or maybe I'll consider buying a Mac. I don't want Bill Gates to control everything in my life.

  • John Smith
    10 years ago
    Nov 03, 2002

    Read Edwin Molina's comments completly. Many of the basic freedom rights will be violated with Palladium!

  • Edwin Molina
    10 years ago
    Oct 29, 2002

    Interesting Pro-Palladium point of view. My opinion is quite different. As a consultant I must try to examine every angle of the emerging technologies. In the short run, Palladium may propose nice incentive... downloadable time-activated software, secure corporate documents. But in the long run it may prove a monopolistic... Use MS Office or the Palladium protected document won't open. Certainly my own mother would HAVE to buy MS Office ($400+). I know of many people who would install Open Office (FREE) and somehow attempt (and succed) to force their way into their own documents. Further more, actual technologies enbeded, but rarely used, exist in current Operating Systems (OS) like Windows 2000 and Windows XP.

    Secure transactions? Secure from who? Hackers… or better said… crackers and script kiddies do not proposed so much of a threat to a regular individual. Medium and large size should worry about intruders and corporate sabotage and/or espionage. Home users should be worried about anti-virus updates and backups… no one do them as they are supposed to. Corporate users should have specialized personnel that take cares of those chores, as well as security.

    Palladium will indeed change PCs as we know it. Some who HAD knowledge to innovate and the others that TRIED to aquire that knowledge will become a dying breed. Take for example file sharing. And I do not mean "illegal" P2P sharing of copyrighted materials, I do mean that someone can jack the security to its highest levels (lets say at a PUBLIC library, school or at the office) and any document created in that PC could not be readable in a non-authorized machine (ie home, school or office). Many of my collegues would use Palladuim at its highest levels of encryption and security... only to be slapped in the face when they can NOT open their own documents in another PC (ie a client).

    Supposedly Palladium will be optional in the next-gen Windows (CodeName: Longhorn), but its just another way of feeding the Moms & Pops who do not dominate computers very well. Don't beleive? Think… what happens when you decide NOT to run a Palladium-compliant PC? Will you be stuck with out-dated hardware? Will you be able to communicate efficiently with Palladium friendly networks? Once Palladium advocates have over 70% of the market, they can offer weak alternatives to non-Palladium PCs (like an 8-track tape) and hoard newer and faster technologies for themselves. It happens NOW! Your average secretary does not NEED Office XP… Office 97 suffice. Microsoft ceased all support for 97… companies had to move. Thay are doing the same with the software icensing. Palladium will, eventually, not be any different.


    Here in 2005? Maybe in a full implementation. But evidence shows that Intel's Serial Identification scheme in their CPUs was an ill attempt to mark PCs. Sure, you could turn it off… but you would not be able to use this-or-that function. Fortunatelly for everyone, the people saw thrught the scheme and refused it. Microsoft's arch-famous registration fiasco (there are several ways to recover your lost registration numbers) is a way to manipulate your cyber-identity. Many users got bitten by the system once they installed SP1. Much more... the ever-changing-no-body-wants-to-read EULAs make every automatic update a potential Big Brother Is Watching issue. Palladium will just make it worse.


    The Palladium future is starting to percollate. Check out the new Windows Media Center OS that just shipped out. Encode any MP3z from any of your legal music CDs on the machine... or try to create a backup SVCD or DVD of your weeding decaying VHS tape. Now try to play it in another PC. Good luck... now you have to hack your own backups and, what is worse... your own PC! Much to the RIAA’s collective sigh, you are victim of… security? You want a PC that can do what you want to do… not what others decide it should do.

    Think that 80% of the home-users do not have critical data (ie life or death), and corporate crucial information is stored in company servers (or at least it should be.) We do not need Intel, Microsoft nor the Trusted Computing Platform Alliance (TCPA) to dictate how to "keep our children safe."

    A note to the MIS and IT Professionals out there... imagine your company right now, with the Palladium security making things worse among users. I rest my case. I urge the author, Mr. Paul Thurrott, as well as all his readers to investigate further at the links provided by Mr. Tom Shiner (editor of WinXP News at http://www.winxpnews.com):


    http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html#additions
    http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq-0.2.html


    Thanks,

    Edwin O. Molina A.
    Independent Computer Consultant

  • roger
    10 years ago
    Oct 29, 2002

    hipe? the only hipe in Palladium is hapening in the music industry and in Microsoft. For the users there is no hype in Palladium

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

White Papers

Get your Windows 7 deployment off to the right start by implementing PC lockdown. A locked-down environment is easier and cheaper to support since users are less likely to make unnecessary changes to the core system configuration - read more here!

Essential Guides

Is your iSCSI "lossy"? The reality is that most off-the-shelf Ethernet hardware deployed for iSCSI can lose packets, resulting in slow performance or application downtime. Learn how to assess your current iSCSI infrastructure and engineer an advanced iSCSI SAN infrastructure.

Web Seminars

What's the best way to keep your network safe from malware? In this web seminar, security expert Greg Shields suggests an alternative method to the traditional blacklisting approach that is common with anti-virus and anti-malware solutions.

eLearning Series

We bring the experts direct to you to share their real-world perspective and expertise. During each event, three sessions stream in real time, so you can learn, ask questions, and get solutions.
Upcoming event: Getting the Most with Exchange 2010 with Paul Robichaux

Subscribe to Windows IT Pro!

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.