Subscribe to Windows IT Pro
December 30, 2009 12:00 AM

Mobile Battle Heats Up Between Apple, Nokia

Windows IT Pro
InstantDoc ID #103369
Rating: (11)

One company is the entrenched market leader, still powerful and in command, but losing share regularly to an upstart and media darling that is again challenging the status quo to the delight of its fanatical followers. But this isn't Microsoft and Apple and the desktop PC market we're talking about, not this time. Instead, the market in question is the mobile market, and while Apple is again in the role of underdog innovator, the market giant it's targeting this time is Nokia.

Unlike Microsoft, however, Nokia isn't waiting to mount a counter attack. This week, the mobile giant issued the second in a series of complaints against Apple, alleging that the Cupertino juggernaut infringes on numerous Nokia patents. Nokia's escalation of its war with Apple is notable, however, because this time it has complained to the US International Trade Commission (ITC) and has expanded its complaints to include MP3 players and PCs.

Nokia previously sued Apple in October, claiming that the iPhone maker infringed on 10 Nokia patents for smart phones. Apple countersued in early December, charging Nokia with infringing on 13 Apple patents. This week's new round of complaints from Nokia includes yet another patent infringement lawsuit against Apple as well. But now Nokia is saying that Apple infringes on Nokia's patents in "virtually all" of its mobile products, including Macbook computers, iPod portable MP3 players, and iPhones.

Nokia is clearly protecting its steadily shrinking market share. At stake is what most believe to be the mainstream and volume computing market of the future: Smart phones and other highly mobile devices with always-on Internet connectivity. Currently, Nokia dominates this market, with about 39 percent market share. But that's down from 42 percent share from a year earlier. Apple, by contrast, is growing and now commands about 17 percent of the global smart phone market. A year ago, the iPhone controlled 13 percent.

Oddly, Apple isn't even Nokia's biggest competitor, at least not yet: RIM Blackberry is the number two player with 21 percent, up from 16 percent a year earlier. So why all the emphasis on Apple? Unlike other smart phone makers, Apple's success has come almost exclusively with consumers, and Apple's entry into this market has jumpstarted sales in this important category. So while Nokia, RIM, and others race to catch up with consumers, Apple has maintained a comfortable lead with this crowd.

Apple is also performing more strongly in its biggest and most important market, the US. As with the Mac, the iPhone's share of users in the US is dramatically bigger than it is internationally, with Apple now the number two smart phone maker behind RIM, but ahead of Microsoft and Palm. Nokia is an also-ran in the US in part because of its emphasis on international-friendly GSM wireless technologies.

Apple is also an unparalleled media darling, with high profile news publications, including the "The Wall Street Journal," "The New York Times," "USA Today," and others seemingly incapable of providing anything other than a modicum of criticism of any of the company's products or strategies. In fact, they seem to serve as free PR for Apple, regularly promoting every Apple product, whether they're relevant to their readers or not. In fact, it should come as no surprise that readers of those publications believe Apple's share of the PC market to be much higher than 3.5 percent (less than 8 percent in the US) it really is simply because of the amount of press Apple generates.

Another more relevant example is the mythical Apple tablet device that is following in the footsteps a similar Microsoft initiative by 8 years but is now expected to unleash another round of innovation and sales. This despite the fact that the existing Tablet PC product line, which has been regularly enhanced over those 8 years and expanded into a range of device types, garners only yawns by the Apple mouthpieces who are now trumpeting the iTablet on an almost daily basis.

Looking ahead, it only gets worse for Nokia. Both Nokia and Apple now have another mobile competitor to fear, with Google's Android platform off to a torrid start. After just a year of limited availability, Android already controls 3.5 percent of the worldwide smart phone market. And with new devices popping up regularly on multiple wireless carriers, and Google's bottomless wallet, Android is sure to grow even more rapidly in 2010. In fact, many mobile analysts already expect Android to battle with the iPhone for the number one spot in the years ahead. That, of course, would leave Nokia to mop up at the bottom of the market. And if this week's lawsuit and ITC complaint are any indication, that's not going to happen without some kicking and screaming on the way down.

But don't mistake what these complaints really are: The death throes of a company that simply let a market slip away from it due to cluelessness and hubris. Apple doesn't have a lock on the future, despite its great products and media savvy, but it certainly will control a bigger share of the market than will Nokia going forward. And that will be just as true worldwide as it in the US.

It's only a matter of time.

Related Content:

ARTICLE TOOLS

Comments
  • Preston
    2 years ago
    Jan 06, 2010

    "Another more relevant example is the mythical Apple tablet device that is following in the footsteps a similar Microsoft initiative by 8 years but is now expected to unleash another round of innovation and sales. This despite the fact that the existing Tablet PC product line, which has been regularly enhanced over those 8 years and expanded into a range of device types, garners only yawns by the Apple mouthpieces who are now trumpeting the iTablet on an almost daily basis."

    Paul's desperate trolling continues. Meanwhile, reports show that Windows market share continues to slide.

    The difference from Microsoft's tablet initiative is that Apple's version won't suck ***.

  • Christopher
    2 years ago
    Jan 03, 2010

    "He throws in needless insults, barbs and is generally just antagonistic."

    You guys need to realize he probably doubles his hit-count by inserting just one snarky comment. You see it as hostility, I think the guy just has a sense of sarcasm, banks on it, and likes pushing buttons because it gives his family financial security.

    "Now when it comes to Apple product reviews, who should I trust more, The WSJ, NY times, USA today and the mainstream media..."

    Why would you respect any of them? I've been a loyal WSJ reader since college but I'm under no particular allusion that Mossberg, et al, know anything about anything -- the guy has been a writer his whole life, he doesn't have a PhD in comp sci.

    Apple gets favorable main-stream press because 95% of their revenue is from 4 consumer devices and there is *zero* financial incentive to cover non-consumer tech. Do you really see USA Today dissecting a new SAN and giving their thoughts on configuring high availability RAID? Every one of those "mainstream" authors probably wouldn't even know how to turn the darn thing on.

    There are a lot of very thorough sites out there who do vastly better analysis than any print publication. AnandTech seems pretty fair with all their coverage as they are a dual-platform-office.

    I'd rather read a Mac user's Windows 7 review (from a true technical veteran, not some fan-blog or journalist), and Paul's MacOS review, because I'd get better deconstruction since everyone would be held to a higher standard.

  • Rhys
    3 years ago
    Dec 31, 2009

    Subzero & tayme are right that Paul sometimes calls out Microsoft with well thought articles etc.

    The problem is, when it comes to criticising Apple, his writing tone changes completely. He throws in needless insults, barbs and is generally just antagonistic. Mac using readers of his blogs get called the iCabal when they respond, while the Windows supporters who are just as bad, don't get the same treatment.

    Now when it comes to Apple product reviews, who should I trust more, The WSJ, NY times, USA today and the mainstream media, or Paul Thurott? A guy that earns his money covering everything MS and who delights in insulting Mac users.

    Tough decision . . .

  • Mark
    3 years ago
    Dec 31, 2009

    Subzero gets it and is correct that you guys are amusing. You should try to make a resolution to step into reality in 2010 and realize that both Apple and Microsoft...along with Google, Sony, Nintendo, and many other consumer electronics companies make good products that all have some flaws. They will all gladly continue to take your money as long as you are willing to give it to them. They could care less if you have products made by one or more of the others...as long as you also buy from them. So, your loyalty goes unnoticed by the very company that each of you seeks to impress.

    Happy New Year!!!
    --tayme

  • subzerohitman721
    3 years ago
    Dec 31, 2009

    Logjamming and Chuckb84,

    You two are so biased and full of garbage, it's amusing. Paul's paycheck comes from Penton Media, Inc NOT MICROSOFT! How can two huge Apple fans and obviously allegedly intellectual superiors, could obviously miss the fact that Penton Media is headquartered in NY City, that the company has been an independent media company since it's founding in 1892. That the company publicizes 113 magazines, 96 Trade Publications, and 145 websites.

    So they chose Paul Thurrott to write about Windows. Let's see that sounds like a business decision to me. With Microsoft currently owning 92 percent of the world desktop market, the vast majority of businesses, and potential customers of 1.2 billion with people needing his kind of help seems logical.

    If Paul was this mindless shill and Microsoft suck up, why would he help Rafael Rivera expose the Microsoft Windows 7 USB/DVD tool violations of the GPL? Or would Paul go out of his way to openly and repeatedly criticize Windows Mobile? Or his repeated criticism of Xbox Live banning? Or his repeated criticism of the of Windows 7's User Account Control features being toned down during the the Beta and Release Candidate stage? Or his epic article on "Where Vista Fails?" Or his most recent article on "Microsoft Just like IBM?" Or Paul's criticism of the Toolbar within Windows 7?

    Sounds pretty maverick and independent to me.

    Or are both you so blind as to suck on the "Teat" of Apple, that you can't see any criticism as being justified? Or that any grain of truth that Apple might have just copied Nokia's patent's, violate international laws, didn't innovate as you repeatedly give them such praise, or that Apple may not be as creative as you say?

    If you guys really are that blind and arrogant, they your words are equally meaningless and equally as amusing. Go on with your rants. But your no different than Waethorn or any other troll jihadist like lotsa and gfryesc1. Hard to tell the difference.

    Happy New Year.

You must log on before posting a comment.

Are you a new visitor? Register Here

advertisement

advertisement

Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft group of companies. Windows IT Pro is used by Penton Media Inc. under license from owner.